The Second Cold War: US-China Competition for Centrality in Infrastructure, Digital, Production, and Finance Networks

Date

2023-01-01

Author

Schindler, Seth
Alami, Ilias
DiCarlo, Jessica
Jepson, Nicholas
Rolf, Steve
Bayırbağ, Mustafa Kemal
Cyuzuzo, Louis
DeBoom, Meredith
Farahani, Alireza F.
Liu, Imogen T.
McNicol, Hannah
Miao, Julie T.
Nock, Philip
Teri, Gilead
Vila Seoane, Maximiliano Facundo
Ward, Kevin
Zajontz, Tim
Zhao, Yawei

Metadata

Show full item record

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Item Usage Stats

34
views

21
downloads

Cite This

Relations between the US and China have deteriorated to their lowest point since their rapprochement in the 1970s. To make sense of contemporary geopolitics, our objective in this article is two-fold. First, we historically situate contemporary US-China rivalry to conceptualise the Second Cold War (SCW). We argue that in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, both the US and China launched ‘restorative’ political projects that harked back to imagined pasts. These projects are mutually exclusive and animate contemporary geopolitics. Second, we conceptualise the spatial logic of great power rivalry in the Second Cold War. In contrast to the first Cold War, when great powers sought to incorporate territory into blocs, the US and China currently compete on a global scale for centrality in four interrelated networks that they anticipate will underpin hegemony in the 21st century: infrastructure (e.g. logistics and energy), digital, production and finance. We review the state of competition in each network and draw two broad conclusions: (1) this mode of competition makes it difficult for either side to conclusively ‘win’ the Second Cold War, and (2) many countries are likely to remain integrated with both the US and China.

URI

https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85174884809&origin=inward
https://hdl.handle.net/11511/106146

Collections

Department of Political Science and Public Administration, Article