Contextualizing performative identity a synthesis of Judith Butler’s performative process ontology and Michel Foucault’s analytics of power

Download

index.pdf

Date

2016

Author

Maze, Jacob Alan

Metadata

Show full item record

Item Usage Stats

301
views

131
downloads

Both Michel Foucault and Judith Butler give an account of a socially constructed subject, yet both philosophers face dilemmas within their own philosophies that are solvable through a reconciliation between the two. While Foucault offers the concepts of genealogy, power and dispositifs to explain the how the subject comes to think, act and speak, there is no mental account of subjectivity to unify the subject and power and explain subject-durability. On the other hand, Butler provides a process ontology of performativity that allows subject-cohesion and permits subversion to power relations, yet she lacks Foucault’s historical contextuality. By combining these two philosophers, one is able to give a reinforced account of subjectivity and how power is exercised that paves the way for an “Analytics of Violence,” or an understanding of how violence comes to exist and is exercised.

Subject Keywords

Power (Philosophy)., Self (Philosophy).

URI

http://etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12620227/index.pdf
https://hdl.handle.net/11511/25869

Collections

Graduate School of Social Sciences, Thesis

Suggestions

OpenMETU
Core

Irony as a philosophical attitude in socrates Korkut, Hacer; İnam, Ahmet; Department of Philosophy (2007) This thesis analyzes the reasons for Socrates' being presented as a paradoxical figure in the early dialogues of Plato. Irony as a fundamental philosophical attitude in Socratic philosophy is discussed with reference to some of the major philosophers of the history of philosophy. The thesis also suggests the possibility of seeing philosophy as an ironic activity and it traces the etymology of the concept of irony in terms of its philosophical importance.
Self-love and self-deception in Seneca, the Stoic Sururi, Ayten; İnam, Ahmet; Department of Philosophy (2005) In this thesis, Seneca̕s notion of self as self-love and the problem of self-deception are analyzed. In examining three types of self-love, اignorant, progressing selves,اthree models of self-deception are discussed. Self-deception is related to the problem of self-knowledge. I discuss the nature of self-love as self-esteem and self-preservation and self-shaping all of which are innate qualities and develop into more complex forms of knowing. Passions are concrete examples of the representations of deceived...
A study of the self in Nietzsche's fatalistic universe of eternal recurrence Canbolat, Argun Abrek; Parkan, Barış; Department of Philosophy (2009) The doctrine of eternal recurrence is not only an aspect of Nietzsche’s philosophy, but a notion that structures the base of his philosophy. The doctrine is analyzed by many interpreters in various ways. The cosmological and the ethical-existential approaches to the doctrine are at the very base wrong. The doctrine’s impact cannot be adequately understood in these terms. Besides, the doctrine of eternal recurrence has multiple problems within it, problems which can be solved if the doctrine is understood an...
Labor, leisure and freedom in the philosophies of Aristotle, Karl Marx and Herbert Marcuse Kılınç, Doğan Barış; Turan, Şeref Halil; Department of Philosophy (2006) The aim of this study is to present an examination of the philosophies of Aristotle, Karl Marx and Herbert Marcuse concerning labor and leisure in the context of freedom. These philosophers have paid attention to the concepts labor and leisure; their view of freedom is dependent on the relationship they have established between labor and leisure. To this end, I firstly give a general overview of the concepts labor, leisure and freedom; afterwards, I try to show how these concepts have been considered in the...
Ending the exile of desire in Spinoza and Hegel Cengiz, Övünç; Çırakman, Elif; Department of Philosophy (2007) The main objective of this master’s thesis is to analyze the place assigned to the phenomenon of desire by Hegel and Spinoza, and to show that the main difference between two philosophers in terms of their understanding of desire and human phenomenon consists in their understanding of the relation between the substance and particulars. In order to fulfill the requirements of this objective, what is focused on is, as different from a certain philosophical thought excluding desire from a true account of human...

Citation Formats

J. A. Maze, “Contextualizing performative identity a synthesis of Judith Butler’s performative process ontology and Michel Foucault’s analytics of power,” M.S. - Master of Science, Middle East Technical University, 2016.