Show/Hide Menu
Hide/Show Apps
anonymousUser
Logout
Türkçe
Türkçe
Search
Search
Login
Login
OpenMETU
OpenMETU
About
About
Open Science Policy
Open Science Policy
Communities & Collections
Communities & Collections
Help
Help
Frequently Asked Questions
Frequently Asked Questions
Videos
Videos
Thesis submission
Thesis submission
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission
Publication submission
Contact us
Contact us
Intercomparison of methods for sampling and analysis of atmospheric mercury species
Date
2001-06-01
Author
Munthe, John
Wangberg, Il
Pirrone, Nicola
Tuncel, Süleyman Gürdal
Iverfield, Adam
Ferrara, Ricardo
Ebinghouse, Rene
Metadata
Show full item record
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License
.
Item Usage Stats
7
views
0
downloads
Cite This
An intercomparison for sampling and analysis of atmospheric mercury species was held in Tuscany, June 1998. Methods for sampling and analysis of total gaseous mercury (TGM), reactive gaseous mercury (RGM) and total particulate mercury (TPM) were used in parallel sampling over a period of 4 days. The results show that the different methods employed for TGM compared well whereas RGM and TPM showed a somewhat higher variability. Measurement results of RGM and TPM improved over the time period indicating that activities at the sampling site during set-up and initial sampling affected the results. Especially the TPM measurement results were affected. Additional parallel sampling was performed for two of the TPM methods under more controlled conditions which yielded more comparable results. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved
Subject Keywords
Speciation
,
Atmosphere
,
Measurement
,
Mercury
URI
https://hdl.handle.net/11511/30487
Journal
Atmospheric Environment
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/s1352-2310(01)00104-2
Collections
Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Article
Citation Formats
IEEE
ACM
APA
CHICAGO
MLA
BibTeX
J. Munthe et al., “Intercomparison of methods for sampling and analysis of atmospheric mercury species,”
Atmospheric Environment
, vol. 35, pp. 3007–3017, 2001, Accessed: 00, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://hdl.handle.net/11511/30487.