Words Words Words

Date

2014-12-01

Author

Sönmez, Margaret Jeanne M.

Metadata

Show full item record

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Item Usage Stats

39
views

0
downloads

Traditional Chinese commentators rightly see that understanding Zhuangzi's way with words is the presupposition for understanding Zhuangzi at all. They are not sure, however, if Zhuangzi's words are super-effective or pure nonsense. I consider Zhuangzi's experience with language, and then turn to Heidegger's word of being to see if it may throw light on Zhuangzi's way of saying. I argue that a conversation between Heidegger and Zhuangzi on language is possible, but only by expanding Heidegger's notion of Gestell (enframing) and through a destruction of the dominant Confucian discourse that obscures Zhuangzi's way of saying.

URI

https://hdl.handle.net/11511/36504

Journal

Narrative and Language Studies

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6253.12115

Collections

Department of Foreign Language Education, Article

Suggestions

OpenMETU
Core

Understanding of music in the philosophy of Wittgenstein Canlar, Simay; Turan, Şeref Halil; Department of Philosophy (2019) In this thesis, Samkhyakarika, which is one of the most important texts of the Indian Philosophy, is analyzed. Moreover, it is argued that Samkhya Philosophy could be examined within the framework of Hadot’s observations and comments on philosophical tradition of Ancient Greek and Roma. Firstly, the main lines of the philosophical-spiritual tradition of Ancient Greek and Roma are shared with the findings and analysis of Hadot. Hadot thinks that Ancient Greek philosophy provides a way of life to the person. ...
Discourse Meaning: The View from Turkish Zeyrek Bozşahin, Deniz; Özge, Umut (Mouton de Gruyter, 2020-05-01) The volume aims to bring together original, unpublished papers on discourse structure and meaning from different frameworks or theoretical perspectives to address research questions revolving around issues instigated by Turkish. Another goal is to offer methodologically different solutions for the research gaps identified in individual chapters. The contributions are based on empirical generalizations and make use of, for example, computerized corpora as the data, examples compiled from naturally occurring ...
Linking discourse-level information and the induction of bilingual discourse connective lexicons Özer, Sibel; Kurfall, Murathan; Zeyrek Bozşahin, Deniz; Mendes, Amália; Oleškevičiene, Giedre Valunaite (2022-6-20) The single biggest obstacle in performing comprehensive cross-lingual discourse analysis is the scarcity of multilingual resources. The existing resources are overwhelmingly monolingual, compelling researchers to infer the discourse-level information in the target languages through error-prone automatic means. The current paper aims to provide a more direct insight into the cross-lingual variations in discourse structures by linking the annotated relations of the TED-Multilingual Discourse Bank, which consi...
Text complexity of reading comprehension passages in the national matriculation english test in China: The development from 1996 to 2020 Yu, Xiaoli (2021-10-01) This study examined the development of text complexity for the past 25 years of reading comprehension passages in the National Matriculation English Test (NMET) in China. Text complexity of 206 reading passages at lexical, syntactic, and discourse levels has been measured longitudinally and compared across the years. The natural language processing tools used in the study included TAALES, TAALED, TAASSC, and TAACO. To compare the differences across the years at various levels of text complexity, ANOVA and M...
Causal Categories In Turkısh Connectives First Results From A Corpus Study And A Judgement Task Derya, Cokal; Zeyrek Bozşahin, Deniz; Sanders, Ted () Connectives are the prototypical linguistic markers of coherence relations in discourse. But connectives cannot express just any coherence relation. In fact, connectives can be grouped according to the type of relation expressed, such as additive, temporal, causal or contrastive relations (3; 4). In addition, recent studies show various languages sometimes have subtle distinctions within the same class of connectives. In Dutch, for instance, the causal connectives omdat and want have been shown to express t...

Citation Formats

M. J. M. Sönmez, “Words Words Words,” Narrative and Language Studies, pp. 0–0, 2014, Accessed: 00, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://hdl.handle.net/11511/36504.