Green Certification and Liquidity Risk

2020-09-01
Green bonds went from an esoteric instrument that caught the interest of a few supranational institutions in the late-2000s to a popular debt instrument issued by governments, supranationals and corporations alike, with a market value of $258 billion and 17% of the bondmarket volume by the end of 2019. What differentiates a green bond from its conventional counterpart is the strict requirement regarding the use of proceeds. A green bond’s issuer is assumed to commit to using the proceeds for only environment-friendly investments. The “green” designation for a bond is often the result of self-labelling, and, in a small but steadily increasing percentage of the issues, this designation is given by a third-party organization such as the Climate Bonds Initiative[1], Sustainalytics[2], and CICERO[3]. One critical issue is whether the risk-return performance of a bond changes when it is “green certified” by one of these organizations. Without certification, the informational asymmetry that exists between the issuer and investor is even higher with certification especially affecting the market liquidity of the green bond. This paper contributes to the literature by examining the liquidity risk of certified versus non-certified USD-denominated corporate green bonds issued between 2013 and 2019. Febi, Schafer, Stephan andSun (2018)[4] find that the impact of liquidity risk on the yield spread of green bonds is negligible. However, Febiet al. do not distinguish between certified and non-certified bonds. The maineffect of certification is an improvement in the informational asymmetry. In amarket where the term “green” has a broad definition, obtaining a certificationwith a clear set of requirements may make a green bond more attractive forinvestors. [1] https://www.climatebonds.net/ [2] https://www.sustainalytics.com/ [3] https://www.cicero.green/[4] Febi, W., Schäfer, D., Stephan, A. and Sun, C., 2018. The impact of liquidity risk on the yield spread of green bonds.

Suggestions

Multi-objective approaches to public debt management
Balıbek, Emre; Köksalan, Murat; Department of Operational Research (2008)
Public debt managers have a certain range of borrowing instruments varying in their interest rate type, currency, maturity etc. at their disposal and have to find an appropriate combination of those while raising debt on behalf of the government. In selecting the combination of instruments to be issued, i.e. the borrowing strategy to be pursued for a certain period of time, debt managers need to consider several objectives that are conflicting by their nature, and the uncertainty associated with the outcome...
Modeling correlation structure for collateralized debt obligations and determining the underlying credit default swap spread equations
İlalan, Deniz; Hayfavi, Azize; Omay, Tolga; Department of Financial Mathematics (2015)
Pricing complex financial derivatives such as collateralized debt obligations (CDOs) is considered as the main reason triggering the 2008 financial crisis. The correlation structure related to the credit risks involved in a portfolio for pricing issues have been tried to overcome via a Gaussian copula framework first introduced by David Li. This approach regards the correlation among the credit risks as normally distributed, enabling us to derive analytical solutions. However, despite its simplicity, this G...
Asset-backed stable numeraire approach for sustainable valuation
Aydin, Nadi Serhan; Rainer, Martin (2020-05-01)
Interest rates underpin almost every instrument/transaction in conventional financial markets. Valuation of the instruments in relation to interest rates remains meaningful only ifcashcan be attributed a worth of its own (which is generally assumed to accumulate over time). The relevant concepts such as the stochastic short rate and the conventional numeraire (i.e. the money market account) not only become restrictive when one attempts to build more realistic models in quantitative finance, but also - as we...
EXAMINATION OF BOND RISK PREMIA FROM THE BANKING PERSPECTIVE
Orhan, Selim; Danışoğlu, Seza; Department of Financial Mathematics (2022-5-10)
Banks are considered as the marginal and sophisticated investors of financial markets. This is evident in the Haddad and Sraer (2020) study that examines the US government bond excess returns. This study extends the Haddad/Sraer analysis to the Turkish government bond market. According to the forecasting results, exposure ratio provides explanatory power over bond excess returns, especially for longer maturities. On the other hand, output gap and industrial growth present strong in-sample forecasting power ...
High-yield bond and energy markets
Gormus, Alper; NAZLIOĞLU, ŞABAN; Soytaş, Uğur (2018-01-01)
High-yield bonds hold a particularly unique space in the debt market. From many aspects, literature suggests these assets to behave more like stocks than bonds. Given the significant similarities between the high-yield bond and stock markets, it is expected for these markets to be similarly affected by certain outside factors. Some shocks, including the ones from energy markets, are known to impact the entire stock market and not just related company shares. Since high-yield bond portfolios include some amo...
Citation Formats
G. Büber and S. Danışoğlu, “Green Certification and Liquidity Risk,” 2020, Accessed: 00, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://hdl.handle.net/11511/84633.