Show/Hide Menu
Hide/Show Apps
Logout
Türkçe
Türkçe
Search
Search
Login
Login
OpenMETU
OpenMETU
About
About
Open Science Policy
Open Science Policy
Open Access Guideline
Open Access Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Communities & Collections
Communities & Collections
Help
Help
Frequently Asked Questions
Frequently Asked Questions
Guides
Guides
Thesis submission
Thesis submission
MS without thesis term project submission
MS without thesis term project submission
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission
Publication submission
Supporting Information
Supporting Information
General Information
General Information
Copyright, Embargo and License
Copyright, Embargo and License
Contact us
Contact us
Writing the Time of Troubles, False Dmitry in Russian Literature (Book Review)
Date
2019-01-01
Author
Pamir Dietrich, Ayşe
Metadata
Show full item record
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License
.
Item Usage Stats
254
views
0
downloads
Cite This
This book discusses the Time of Troubles (Smutnoe vremya) period and the pretenders who appeared after the killing of Ivan the Terrible’s legal heir, Ivan, leaving the Empire without leadership. The power struggle began immediately after the death of Tsar Ivan which brought the Rurikid dynasty to an end; rival boyars created a weak government and autocracy. The book discusses these issues and the representations of Dmitry, the son of Ivan the Terrible within the context of Russian literature. The absence of legitimate royal authority after the demise of the Rurikid dynasty in 1598 caused a dynastic crisis. This period known as the Time of Troubles was characterized by a dynastic struggle that nearly resulted in the shattering of the Muscovite state. It finally came to an end in 1613 with the appearance of the new dynasty, the Romanovs. The book consists of six chapter. In the Introduction the author states that she will examine the “protagonist”, Dmitry, within the context of Russian literature. She examines Dmitry both as a literary figure and a real historical one, and describes Dmitry as a “tabula rasa” because he died under mysterious circumstances with no credible witnesses to confirm how he died. In her book, the author conducts her research both chronologically and diachronically. Chapter I is an introductory chapter that provides information on the eighteenth and nineteenth-century Russian texts Tulupov’s Life of St. Dmitry, The Story of Grishka Otrepev and Tale of Recovery that illustrate the prehistory of Dmitry. The author compares seventeenth century text types and arrives at the conclusion that all three works express a political message and that all of them contain a hagiographical structure and explication. Chapter II examines Russia’s historical experience in the eighteenth century and its literary tradition. In this chapter, the author examines Sumarokov’s tragedy Dmitry the Pretender and Narezhny’s Dmitry the Pretender. The author compares the main causes of his usurpation and its interpretation in literary works of the seventeenth century and the eighteenth century, and concludes that the writers of the seventeenth century crafted quasi-literary, polemical, monological interpretations of the period and determined who was the sole man qualified to rule. Prose treatments of the Dmitry material were the most appropriate way to shape their literature. Eighteenth century writers, on the other hand, recognized a large number of candidates to the throne and their interpretation of the period was multifaceted; tragedy was the most popular literary genres. In Chapter III, the author examines the body of works discussing Dmitry and the Time of Troubles in the 1820s and 1830s: Alexander Pushkin’s Comedy about Tsar Boris and Grishka Otrepev, Faddey Bulgarin’s Dmitry the Pretender, Alexey Khomyakov’s Dmitry the Pretender, Mikhail Pogodin’s Historical Portrait of Dmitry the Pretender. She states that the writers of Russia’s early nineteenth century were fascinated with the Dmitry materials, and each writer depicted him as a man who lived among others and saw him as an alternative to the reigning autocracy. However, they later arrived at the conclusion that there was no viable alternative to the reigning autocracy. Chapter IV deals with two plays written in response to the Era of Great Reforms in 1866: Alexander Ostrovsky’s Dmitry the Pretender and Vasily Shuisky and Nikolay Chaev’s Dmitry the Pretender. She criticizes both authors’ works on a number of fronts, regarding all of them as being overly ambitious in that they attempt to treat too many unrelated issues, and that the miscellaneous political issues raised in these dramatic works have no clear connection to one another. In the Chapter V, the author states that Dmitry disappears from Russian novels and plays for a century and reappears after the demise of the Soviet Union. She examines Daniil Mordovtsev’s False Dmitry: A Historical Novel of the Time of Troubles, Vasily Avenarius’s In Service to the Tsarevich, Nikolay Alekseev’s The False Tsarevich and Alexey Suvorin’s Tsar Dmitry the Pretender and Tsarevna Xenya. The author concludes that each writer has presented his own interpretation of Dmitry and his era, that these works are clearly independent and any similarities among them are merely coincidental with no pattern to them. Since each writer has selected his own particular assortment of “facts”, the novels each follow their own unique line of development. On a more general note, the author argues that the collection of late nineteenth century works on the Time of Troubles should be interpreted in the context of both their local frame of reference and national pride in the country’s cultural heritage. However, in the Soviet period Dmitry’s disappearance was the result of the Soviets’ emphasis on shaping the nation’s future rather than linking present realities to the national past. In the Conclusion, the author points out that all of the works discussed simultaneously deal with two distinct periods in time – the time in which the works are set and the time in which they were composed. For seventeenth century writers, marking the passing of the old dynasty was important, but the establishment of a new dynasty was just as significant. In the two eighteenth century works that were examined, contemporary political issues were treated in the context of Dmitry’s era. Nineteenth century works more closely resemble seventeenth century works in that the contemporary relevance of the historical events these works deal with is their main focus. According to the author, as long as writers continue to deal with political issues in literature or the theater, the figure of Dmitry will remain a relevant character. This book is very well written source examining the Time of Troubles period, a period when there was no legal heir to run the state, when dynastic struggle began the process of bringing an end to the Rurik Dynasty and leading to a period pretenders. The author provides different interpretations for the “protagonist”, Dmitry, within the context of Russian literature. The author particularly examines different writers’ works in chronological order and discusses the legitimacy of Dmitry by comparing the treatments of the pretenders. This book should be of interest to anyone interested in the period of the Time of Troubles and usurpation and their interpretation in Russian literature.
URI
https://www.ijors.net/issue8_1_2019/reviews/ayse_dietrich.html
https://hdl.handle.net/11511/102447
Journal
International Journal of Russian Studies
Collections
Graduate School of Social Sciences, Article
Suggestions
OpenMETU
Core
Russian Monarchy Representation and Rule (Book Review)
Pamir Dietrich, Ayşe (2017-07-01)
This book provides a collection of essays by Richard Worthman about the history of the Russian monarchy. The book consists of introduction and four parts. In the introduction Worthman describes how and why he approached the Russian monarchy as a continuing institution and political culture rather than a succession of individual rulers who were unaware of the social and historical context in which they reigned; how the Russian monarchy functioned, its depiction in visual and literary media, its presence in ...
Writing Resistance Revolutionary Memoirs of Shlissel’burg Prison, 1881-1906 (Book Review)
Pamir Dietrich, Ayşe (2022-01-01)
This book is about the memoirs of the members of one branch called People’s Will (Narodnaya volya) of the Populist Movement (Narodnik Movement) that conducted terrorist activities, and were imprisoned in Shlissel’burg Fortress between 1884 and 1905. Young is the editor and the translator of these memoirs. Who were the Populists? After the emancipation of the serfs in 1861 under Tsar Alexander II and the dissatisfaction with it, the Populist Movement, which was a spontaneous and purely national socialist re...
Stalinism at War, 1937-49, the Soviet Union in World War II (Book Reivew)
Pamir Dietrich, Ayşe (2023-01-01)
This book, organized in nine chapters, is about World War II and Stalin’s policies. Chapter 1 discusses whether the Soviet Union was ready to confront the assault of a modern, industrialized army; mass warfare; the question of how important the different stages of World War II were in the lives of ordinary citizens, whether Stalin’s totalitarian state adequately prepared the country for World War II; the deportations; and the Great Purges of 1937–1938 that eliminated many of the most capable and sophistica...
Ivan the Terrible in Russian Historical Memory since 1991 (Book Review)
Pamir Dietrich, Ayşe (2022-01-01)
This book is about the Russian Tsar Ivan IV the Terrible who was the first ruler to adopt the title Tsar of all Russia. Ivan the Terrible’s unhealthy life increased his paranoia and brutality, and in order to reduce the Chosen Council’s (advisory council) power, dominated by the boyars, he threatened that he would abdicate to the Council to gain more power and to remove all obstacles to his absolute rule. He then divided his realm into two separate states. He organized a loyal militia, the oprichnina, in t...
The Russian Nobility in the Age of Alexander I
Pamir Dietrich, Ayşe (2023-01-01)
This book is about the Russian nobility during the reign of Alexander I and their role in social and political life. It consists of six parts. Parts I is about the privileges and status of the Russian nobility in the age of Alexander I. The author introduces the main privileges used by the hereditary nobility such as “freedom from service and privileged access to military and civil service, and hence to rank; freedom from personal taxes; freedom from corporal punishment; inviolability of noble status, exce...
Citation Formats
IEEE
ACM
APA
CHICAGO
MLA
BibTeX
A. Pamir Dietrich, “Writing the Time of Troubles, False Dmitry in Russian Literature (Book Review),”
International Journal of Russian Studies
, vol. 8, no. 8/1 2019, pp. 93–95, 2019, Accessed: 00, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.ijors.net/issue8_1_2019/reviews/ayse_dietrich.html.