Comparison of missing data imputation methods applied to daily temperature and precipitation data in Turkey

Date

2023-8-07

Author

Gezgen, Didem

Metadata

Show full item record

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Item Usage Stats

391
views

129
downloads

Cite This

A significant portion of the data under analysis contains missing values, which hinders the generation of meaningful results, particularly when dealing with time-dependent data where the order of observations is crucial. This issue leads to unreliable outcomes in statistical analyses applied in fields such as meteorology and economy. To address this challenge, handling missing values meticulously in time-dependent data is imperative. In this thesis, daily average temperature and total precipitation data, obtained from the General Directorate of Meteorology of Turkey, were utilized. The primary objective was to impute the missing values in these datasets using various methods and subsequently compare their performance. Missing values were intentionally introduced into the temperature and precipitation data. The methods employed for imputation included Simple Arithmetic Average Method (SAA), K-Nearest Neighbor Method (KNN), Random Forest Method (RF), Multiple Imputation by Chained Equation Method (MICE), and Generalized Adversarial Imputation Network (GAIN). The outcomes were assessed based on the Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), Coefficient of Variation of Root Mean Square Error (CVRMSE), and Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE). The results indicated that Random Forests exhibited superior performance in most cases, followed by KNN and GAIN.

Subject Keywords

General Adversarial Imputation Network (GAIN), Multiple Imputation by Chained Equation (MICE), Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE), Meteorological data, Random Forest (RF)

URI

https://hdl.handle.net/11511/104882

Collections

Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Thesis