Show/Hide Menu
Hide/Show Apps
Logout
Türkçe
Türkçe
Search
Search
Login
Login
OpenMETU
OpenMETU
About
About
Open Science Policy
Open Science Policy
Open Access Guideline
Open Access Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Communities & Collections
Communities & Collections
Help
Help
Frequently Asked Questions
Frequently Asked Questions
Guides
Guides
Thesis submission
Thesis submission
MS without thesis term project submission
MS without thesis term project submission
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission
Publication submission
Supporting Information
Supporting Information
General Information
General Information
Copyright, Embargo and License
Copyright, Embargo and License
Contact us
Contact us
Investigation of Middle School Students' Argumentation Schemes in Different Argumentative Orientations
Download
12480-78061-2-PB.pdf
Date
2024-01-01
Author
Şen, Mehmet
Sungur, Semra
Öztekin, Ceren
Metadata
Show full item record
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License
.
Item Usage Stats
41
views
10
downloads
Cite This
This study investigated 35 middle school students' argumentation schemes in two different argumentative orientations, namely, immersion orientation (i.e., learning of argument through immersion) and socio-scientific orientation (i.e., emphasizing the interaction between science and society) integrated into science instruction in the heat and matter and electricity units. The research design of this qualitative study is a single case and the study lasted six weeks. While students produced their first-hand data in immersion orientation, they used already available second-hand data (e.g., evidence cards) in socio-scientific orientation. Data were obtained from whole-class discussions, collected through classroom observations, and analyzed deductively. Findings showed students commonly used argument from position to know, analogy, and evidence to hypothesis in immersion orientation, whereas they used argument from sign, expert opinion, example, correlation to cause, and consequence mainly in socio-scientific orientation. These findings supported that the use of some argumentation schemes can depend on the type of argumentative orientation. A comparison of students' argumentation schemes used in different units when immersion orientation was used also suggested that the use of argumentation schemes is independent of the topic. Findings were discussed in detail regarding argumentation schemes and specific suggestions were provided.
URI
https://hdl.handle.net/11511/110777
Journal
EGITIM VE BILIM-EDUCATION AND SCIENCE
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15390/eb.2024.12480
Collections
Department of Mathematics and Science Education, Article
Citation Formats
IEEE
ACM
APA
CHICAGO
MLA
BibTeX
M. Şen, S. Sungur, and C. Öztekin, “Investigation of Middle School Students’ Argumentation Schemes in Different Argumentative Orientations,”
EGITIM VE BILIM-EDUCATION AND SCIENCE
, no. 219, pp. 69–96, 2024, Accessed: 00, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://hdl.handle.net/11511/110777.