Show/Hide Menu
Hide/Show Apps
Logout
Türkçe
Türkçe
Search
Search
Login
Login
OpenMETU
OpenMETU
About
About
Open Science Policy
Open Science Policy
Open Access Guideline
Open Access Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Communities & Collections
Communities & Collections
Help
Help
Frequently Asked Questions
Frequently Asked Questions
Guides
Guides
Thesis submission
Thesis submission
MS without thesis term project submission
MS without thesis term project submission
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission
Publication submission
Supporting Information
Supporting Information
General Information
General Information
Copyright, Embargo and License
Copyright, Embargo and License
Contact us
Contact us
The cost of dissent: A case from Turkish politics with the examination of social media reactions
Date
2024-10-23
Author
Ersoy, Hilal
Özakay, Özgün
Karagenç, Kardelen
Metadata
Show full item record
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License
.
Item Usage Stats
12
views
0
downloads
Cite This
In March 2021, Turkey announced withdrawal from the Istanbul Convention, a treaty adopted by the Council of Europe that sets legal standards to protect women from gender-based and domestic violence. Subsequently, supporters of the ruling Justice and Development Party (AKP) and members of some other right-wing parties requested the abolition of Law No. 6284 on Protection of the Family and the Prevention of Violence Against Women, which was prepared based on the principles of the Istanbul Convention. However, an unexpected reaction came from one of AKP’s parliamentary group deputy chairmans, Özlem Zengin. Right before the general elections in May 2023, she argued that the law should not be abolished and declared, "Law 6284 is our red line." Following Zengin’s statement, public discussions about her gained momentum among people from the ingroup (e.g., the supporters of AKP) and the outgroup (e.g., supporters of opposition parties). In this study, we aimed to identify the extent and the content of the criticisms made by both the ingroup and outgroup members online regarding Zengin’s statement. The data was obtained from the comment sections of several news videos on YouTube and the online forum called EkşiSözlük. Grounding on the theories of Social Identity and Social Categorization, we analyzed the data using reflexive thematic analysis approach. We conceptualized three themes: (i) perception of ideology inconsistency, (ii) exclusion from the ingroup, and (iii) the outgroup’s moral superiority. The present research implicated that both the ingroup and outgroup members perceived Zengin’s statement as inconsistent with her ideological stance. Criticisms made by the ingroup members demonstrated that she was dangerous and damaging to the cohesion of the ingroup. Outgroup members underlined that they will be the ones advocating for her rights after the election. Keywords:women’s rights, social identity, social categorization, reflexive thematic analysis.
URI
https://hdl.handle.net/11511/111865
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.13160
Conference Name
ICP 2024 - 33rd International Congress of Psychology
Collections
Graduate School of Social Sciences, Conference / Seminar
Citation Formats
IEEE
ACM
APA
CHICAGO
MLA
BibTeX
H. Ersoy, Ö. Özakay, and K. Karagenç, “The cost of dissent: A case from Turkish politics with the examination of social media reactions,” presented at the ICP 2024 - 33rd International Congress of Psychology, Praha, Çek Cumhuriyeti, 2024, Accessed: 00, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://hdl.handle.net/11511/111865.