Show/Hide Menu
Hide/Show Apps
Logout
Türkçe
Türkçe
Search
Search
Login
Login
OpenMETU
OpenMETU
About
About
Open Science Policy
Open Science Policy
Open Access Guideline
Open Access Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Communities & Collections
Communities & Collections
Help
Help
Frequently Asked Questions
Frequently Asked Questions
Guides
Guides
Thesis submission
Thesis submission
MS without thesis term project submission
MS without thesis term project submission
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission
Publication submission
Supporting Information
Supporting Information
General Information
General Information
Copyright, Embargo and License
Copyright, Embargo and License
Contact us
Contact us
Evaluation of five methods for the interpolation of bad leads in the solution of the inverse electrocardiography problem
Download
Serinagaoglu_Dogrusoz_2024_Physiol._Meas._45_095012.pdf
Date
2024-09-24
Author
Serinağaoğlu Doğrusöz, Yeşim
Bear, L.R.
Bergquist, J.A.
Rababah, A.S.
Good, W.
Stoks, J.
Svehlikova, J.
van Dam, E.
Brooks, D.H.
MacLeod, R.S.
Metadata
Show full item record
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License
.
Item Usage Stats
20
views
1
downloads
Cite This
Objective.This study aims to assess the sensitivity of epicardial potential-based electrocardiographic imaging (ECGI) to the removal or interpolation of bad leads.Approach.We utilized experimental data from two distinct centers. Langendorff-perfused pig (n= 2) and dog (n= 2) hearts were suspended in a human torso-shaped tank and paced from the ventricles. Six different bad lead configurations were designed based on clinical experience. Five interpolation methods were applied to estimate the missing data. Zero-order Tikhonov regularization was used to solve the inverse problem for complete data, data with removed bad leads, and interpolated data. We assessed the quality of interpolated ECG signals and ECGI reconstructions using several metrics, comparing the performance of interpolation methods and the impact of bad lead removal versus interpolation on ECGI.Main results.The performance of ECG interpolation strongly correlated with ECGI reconstruction. The hybrid method exhibited the best performance among interpolation techniques, followed closely by the inverse-forward and Kriging methods. Bad leads located over high amplitude/high gradient areas on the torso significantly impacted ECGI reconstructions, even with minor interpolation errors. The choice between removing or interpolating bad leads depends on the location of missing leads and confidence in interpolation performance. If uncertainty exists, removing bad leads is the safer option, particularly when they are positioned in high amplitude/high gradient regions. In instances where interpolation is necessary, the inverse-forward and Kriging methods, which do not require training, are recommended.Significance.This study represents the first comprehensive evaluation of the advantages and drawbacks of interpolating versus removing bad leads in the context of ECGI, providing valuable insights into ECGI performance.
Subject Keywords
body surface potential measurements
,
electrocardiographic imaging
,
interpolation
,
Inverse electrocardiography
URI
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85204819940&origin=inward
https://hdl.handle.net/11511/112080
Journal
Physiological measurement
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6579/ad74d6
Collections
Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Article
Citation Formats
IEEE
ACM
APA
CHICAGO
MLA
BibTeX
Y. Serinağaoğlu Doğrusöz et al., “Evaluation of five methods for the interpolation of bad leads in the solution of the inverse electrocardiography problem,”
Physiological measurement
, vol. 45, no. 9, pp. 0–0, 2024, Accessed: 00, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85204819940&origin=inward.