Show/Hide Menu
Hide/Show Apps
Logout
Türkçe
Türkçe
Search
Search
Login
Login
OpenMETU
OpenMETU
About
About
Open Science Policy
Open Science Policy
Open Access Guideline
Open Access Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Communities & Collections
Communities & Collections
Help
Help
Frequently Asked Questions
Frequently Asked Questions
Guides
Guides
Thesis submission
Thesis submission
MS without thesis term project submission
MS without thesis term project submission
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission
Publication submission
Supporting Information
Supporting Information
General Information
General Information
Copyright, Embargo and License
Copyright, Embargo and License
Contact us
Contact us
The effect of screening parameters on miscible and immiscible CO2 EOR applications
Download
10686161.pdf
Date
2024-12-2
Author
Arslan, Umut Efe
Metadata
Show full item record
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License
.
Item Usage Stats
48
views
14
downloads
Cite This
CO2 injection has been employed as an enhanced oil recovery (EOR) method for over 50 years and is classified into two types: miscible and immiscible. In miscible injection, CO₂ and reservoir fluid mix to form a single-phase fluid, whereas in immiscible injection, they do not. Achieving miscibility depends on the minimum miscibility pressure (MMP), the lowest pressure at which CO2 completely mixes with reservoir oil at a given temperature. MMP is a critical design parameter for CO₂ injection, alongside API gravity, reservoir temperature, reservoir pressure, permeability, and porosity, which also play significant roles in determining the success of the process. To evaluate the combined effects of these parameters, black oil simulations were conducted using five distinct oil samples with varying API gravities. MMP values were calculated through slim tube simulations and empirical correlations. Porosity and permeability effects were analyzed using Petrel’s Uncertainty and Optimization tool for both miscible and immiscible scenarios. Pearson and Chatterjee correlations were implemented to porosity, permeability, and recovery factor data. Results indicated that both porosity and permeability negatively affect recovery factors, with porosity having a greater influence in miscible runs, while permeability is more significant in immiscible runs. Furthermore, sensitivity analyses were performed on reservoir temperature and pressure for one fluid sample. These analyses revealed that pressure negatively impacts recovery factors in immiscible cases and positively impacts miscible cases, while temperature has the opposite effect, showing positive influence in immiscible runs and negative influence in miscible runs.
Subject Keywords
Carbon dioxide
,
Screening
,
Minimum miscibility pressure
,
Miscible
,
Immiscible
URI
https://hdl.handle.net/11511/112679
Collections
Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Thesis
Citation Formats
IEEE
ACM
APA
CHICAGO
MLA
BibTeX
U. E. Arslan, “The effect of screening parameters on miscible and immiscible CO2 EOR applications,” M.S. - Master of Science, Middle East Technical University, 2024.