Show/Hide Menu
Hide/Show Apps
Logout
Türkçe
Türkçe
Search
Search
Login
Login
OpenMETU
OpenMETU
About
About
Open Science Policy
Open Science Policy
Open Access Guideline
Open Access Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Communities & Collections
Communities & Collections
Help
Help
Frequently Asked Questions
Frequently Asked Questions
Guides
Guides
Thesis submission
Thesis submission
MS without thesis term project submission
MS without thesis term project submission
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission
Publication submission
Supporting Information
Supporting Information
General Information
General Information
Copyright, Embargo and License
Copyright, Embargo and License
Contact us
Contact us
A Multi-Criteria Decision Support Tool for Shared Decision Making in Clinical Consultation
Date
2024-09-01
Author
TUNCER ŞAKAR, CEREN
Keith-Jopp, Chloe
Yet, Barbaros
Joyner, Christopher
Hill, Adele
Roberts, James
Marsh, William
Morrissey, Dylan
Metadata
Show full item record
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License
.
Item Usage Stats
13
views
0
downloads
Cite This
In clinical consultation, Shared Decision Making (SDM) between the patient and clinician can inform the patient about available treatment options, likely harms and benefits in order to reach a joint decision that accommodates the patient's preferences. Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) can be beneficial for this complex problem by offering systematic approaches to elicit preferences for multiple conflicting criteria and evaluate alternatives accordingly. We propose an online SDM tool based on MCDA to guide decisions in clinical consultation where there are multiple treatment options whose outcomes in different factors vary according to the patient. The tool was designed with a panel of domain experts and it enables rapid elicitation of patient preferences and clinician judgements. It is based on Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enrichment Evaluations II (PROMETHEE II) to produce a comprehensive evaluation of the options. The patient-specific outcomes used in the SDM tool are derived from predictive machine learning models or published evidence. The tool was firstly qualitatively evaluated using a fictitious shoulder pain scenario with three focus groups of consultant and specialist physiotherapists. It was evaluated further with patients via structured interview format. The general response was positive; stating that the tool was informative about options and their performance in multiple criteria, and also useful in making a joint decision. The tool is ready to be incorporated into clinical care and evaluated by clinicians and patients in parallel with existing processes.
Subject Keywords
clinical consultation
,
multi-criteria decision analysis
,
online tool
,
PROMETHEE
,
qualitative evaluation
,
shared decision making
URI
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85210068921&origin=inward
https://hdl.handle.net/11511/112785
Journal
Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/mcda.70001
Collections
Graduate School of Informatics, Article
Citation Formats
IEEE
ACM
APA
CHICAGO
MLA
BibTeX
C. TUNCER ŞAKAR et al., “A Multi-Criteria Decision Support Tool for Shared Decision Making in Clinical Consultation,”
Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis
, vol. 31, no. 5-6, pp. 0–0, 2024, Accessed: 00, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85210068921&origin=inward.