Ideology, subject, architecture: the transformation of architectural theory and the architect-subject in the 21st century

Çavdar, Rabia Çiğdem
This thesis will concentrate on how architecture is reproduced by ideology to structure/constitute the mind. I think that dominant ideologies ceased to structure the physical world (or perhaps it is easier for them to play over the physical world - power already has done it) and their new target is the human mind, where they have the potential to make radical inceptions. This thesis asks the question of how architecture affects the human mind with the transformation of late capitalism: how late capitalism uses architecture as an agent (or apparatus) to change the construction of the human mind in order to impose its ideology, through the transformative tools presented in the twentyfirst century. The thesis will be structured over three conceptual domains: subject, ideology and architecture. These three domains have a profound epistemological relation to the definition. The main argument is that “architecture” is a kind of “point de capitone”, in Lacanian terms, between “the subject” (human mind), which is defined as the sublime object of ideology by Zizek, and “ideology”; the role of architecture in transformation of the mind. The reason behind this statement is that especially after the digital turn, not only in architecture but also in all life patterns, free-floating meanings began to invade the complete social structure; every concept that constitutes societal life was displaced. Everything began to be described with the prefix “post”, such as post-historical, post-humanist, post-political, post-ideological, post-theory and even, astonishingly, "post-truth". Under these circumstances, in which truth becomes “meaningless”, I propose a neo-structuralist argument which is that to fix these fluid surfaces, it is possible to reactivate the Lacanian term “point de capitone” for re-constituting “meaning” and “truth”. In Lacanian terminology, “point de capitone” works to fix meaning between two different fields. In this dissertation, my claim is that “architecture” as a cultural form could be used as “point de capitone” between ideology and the subject in the “post-truth era”. I think that epistemologically re-structured architecture as an “interface” has potential to turn into a “meaning-fixer” in a place flooded with a multitude of free-floating concepts. Meanwhile via this “point de capitone”, a redoubling procedure that re-creates the lost otherness will re-constitute an “incommensurable dialectic” for providing social antagonism. With the awareness of new digital agents on space structuring/perceiving, I claim that “architect-subject” can re-configure itself for re-defining a new regime of architectural theory. It is clear that the object of theory has changed, and the new object of architectural theory is the “architect-subject”.


Architecture, ideology, representation : party headquarters as a new mode in representing power since the 1980’s
Yılmaz, Fadime; Sargın, Güven Arif; Department of Architecture (2009)
The main objective of this study is to question the potential of architecture as a representational medium of ideology. In order to exemplify this overlapping relationship between ideology and architecture, this study focuses on the headquarters erected by major parties of Turkey since the 1980’s. Having a significant position within society and particularly being a part of political system, parties obviously define ideological formations in order to preserve their existence and also strengthen their positi...
Processing materiality through architectural information
Dai, Meral Cana; Savaş Sargın, Ayşen; Department of Architecture (2015)
Constituting a fundamental ground for the discipline of architecture, the concept of materiality is the central consideration of this thesis. Besides a particular set of materials by which architectural production made out of, the literal aspect, materiality also refers to all architectonic qualities that form the physical constitution of an architectural product, the referential aspect. Taking referential aspect as its basis, this thesis considers architecture as an “organizational system” and approaches m...
Architecture and public dialogue : an evaluation of the role of architecture centers
Demirel, Buket; Erkılıç, Mualla; Department of Architecture (2005)
This thesis points out the transformation in the visions of architectural institutions about architecture-public dialogue, the interrelations of architect-client to architecture-the public, in a historical perspective. It states that architecture center as a phenomenon has been emerged with the transformation of the consideration of the functions of architectural institutions from merely guaranteeing competence and integrity to stimulating awareness, accessibility, participation and collaboration of both pr...
Architecture as an apparatus of “immortalization and glorification”: a critical analysis of wittgensteinian [true] architecture
Turan, Oktay; Cengizkan, Ali; Department of Architecture (2007)
This study is an inquiry into architecture understood as an apparatus of immortalization and glorification by means of a dialectic formulation on the architecture of the synecdochic Interwar (angst) Period (1919-1939) based on the assumptions of Ludwig Wittgenstein (1889-1951). It is claimed that a dialectical relation between Wittgenstein and his contemporaries may contribute to the understanding of the conceptions regarding ideal of [true] architecture itself. The thesis suggests that these assumptions ma...
An Ontological inquiry on potentials of criticality and conceptualization of program in architecture
Kızıl, Sinan Cem; Sargın, Güven Arif; Department of Architecture (2017)
The relation between architecture and social change is one of the key themes in historical discourse of architectural theory. The tradition of criticality has been consolidated after enlightenment and it caused distrust towards norms of architecture. Even though this tradition of criticality eventually turns to its roots and criticises the ideals of enlightenment in postmodern discourses, it is clear that namely postmodern architectures still subjected to criticism similar to their modernist predecessors. I...
Citation Formats
R. Ç. Çavdar, “Ideology, subject, architecture: the transformation of architectural theory and the architect-subject in the 21st century,” Ph.D. - Doctoral Program, Middle East Technical University, 2018.