Show/Hide Menu
Hide/Show Apps
Logout
Türkçe
Türkçe
Search
Search
Login
Login
OpenMETU
OpenMETU
About
About
Open Science Policy
Open Science Policy
Communities & Collections
Communities & Collections
Help
Help
Frequently Asked Questions
Frequently Asked Questions
Guides
Guides
Thesis submission
Thesis submission
MS without thesis term project submission
MS without thesis term project submission
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission
Publication submission
Supporting Information
Supporting Information
General Information
General Information
Copyright, Embargo and License
Copyright, Embargo and License
Contact us
Contact us
A New pairwise comparison scale for analytic hierarchy pprocess
Download
index.pdf
Date
2019
Author
Yıldırım, Boğaç Can
Metadata
Show full item record
Item Usage Stats
234
views
141
downloads
Cite This
One of the most significant difficulties in daily life or business decision problems is that they often involve multiple criteria, alternatives and/or stakeholders. Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is one of the most widely used multi-criteria decision making tools in such problems. Despite its wide acceptance due to its systematic and simple procedure, AHP has limitations especially in terms of the numerical comparison scale used in one of its core steps: Pairwise comparisons. AHP is based on verbal comparison of alternatives, which are then converted to numerical scores with a one-to-one mapping between the verbal comparisons and and a numerical scale. The choice of numerical scale affects one of the most important characteristics of pairwise comparisons, which is named as “consistency”. This study includes the comparison of the most widely used numerical pairwise comparison scale (Fundamental Scale) with other main numerical scales that have been suggested since the first foundation of AHP (Saaty, 1980). In the comparison procedure, the limitations of Fundamental Scale are identified, a new scale is proposed considering these limitations, and characteristics of all numerical pairwise comparison scales are analyzed. These analyses are tested with extensive simulations. All numerical scales are evaluated on an example decision making problem. Lastly, the advantages and disadvantages of the numerical scales are presented.
Subject Keywords
Decision making.
,
Analytic mappings.
,
Functions of several complex variables.
,
Decision making
URI
http://etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12622958/index.pdf
https://hdl.handle.net/11511/27994
Collections
Graduate School of Social Sciences, Thesis
Suggestions
OpenMETU
Core
A parallel between regret theory and outranking methods for multicriteria decision making under imprecise information
Ozerol, Gul; Karasakal, Esra (Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2008-08-01)
Incorporation of the behavioral issues of the decision maker (DM) is among the aspects that each Multicriteria Decision Making (MCDM) method implicitly or explicitly takes into account. As postulated by regret theory, the feelings of regret and rejoice are among the behavioral issues associated with the entire decision making process. Within the context of MCDM, the DM may feel regret, when the chosen alternative is compared with another one having at least one better criterion value. PROMETHEE II is a wide...
An Interactive partitioning approach for multiobjective decision making under a general monotone utility function
Karasakal, Esra (2013-09-01)
We develop an interactive partitioning approach for solving the multiobjective decision making problem of a decision maker (DM) who has an implicit general monotone utility function. The approach reduces feasible solution space using the DM's preferences. Hypothetical solutions called partition ideals (PIs) that dominate portions of the efficient frontier are generated and those that are inferior to a feasible solution are used to eliminate the dominated regions. We investigate the issues in representation ...
A statistical unified framework for rank-based multiple classifier decision combination
Saranlı, Afşar (2001-04-01)
This study presents a theoretical investigation of the rank-based multiple classifier decision combination problem, with the aim of providing a unified framework to understand a variety of such systems. The combination of the decisions of more than one classifiers with the aim of improving overall system performance is a concept of general interest in pattern recognition, as a viable alternative to designing a single sophisticated classifier. The problem of combining the classifier decisions in the raw form...
A Model Selection criterion for the Mixture Reduction problem based on the Kullback-Leibler Divergence
D'Ortenzio, Alessandro; Manes, Costanzo; Orguner, Umut (2022-01-01)
In order to be properly addressed, many practical problems require an accurate stochastic characterization of the involved uncertainties. In this regard, a common approach is the use of mixtures of parametric densities which allow, in general, to arbitrarily approximate complex distributions by a sum of simpler elements. Nonetheless, in contexts like target tracking in clutter, where mixtures of densities are commonly used to approximate the posterior distribution, the optimal Bayesian recursion leads to a ...
A SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE METHOD FOR BID/NO BID DECISION MAKING
Sönmez, Rifat (2017-01-01)
The bid/no bid decision is an important and complex process, and is impacted by numerous variables that are related to the contractor, project, client, competitors, tender and market conditions. Despite the complexity of bid decision making process, in the construction industry the majority of bid/no bid decisions is made informally based on experience, judgment, and perception. In this paper, a procedure based on support vector machines and backward elimination regression is presented for improving the exi...
Citation Formats
IEEE
ACM
APA
CHICAGO
MLA
BibTeX
B. C. Yıldırım, “A New pairwise comparison scale for analytic hierarchy pprocess,” M.S. - Master of Science, Middle East Technical University, 2019.
