Nationalist bias in Turkish official discourse on hate speech: a Rawlsian criticism

This article analyzes the approach in Turkey on hate speech by evaluating legal regulations, decisions and public responses. We argue that the Turkish case cultivates neither a lenient, nor a restrictive response to hate speech, because a strong nationalist bias seems to be at work in interpreting, penalizing or allowing hate speech. The peculiarity of the Turkish case stems from a prejudice that hate speech might be conducted only against the nation, unity of the state, or the principles of regime, rather than against vulnerable groups or identities. By focusing on the Hrant Dink case among others we try to demonstrate the most striking example of this prejudice.


Politics and the Mass Media in Turkey
Kaya, Ahmet Raşit; Çakmur, Barış (Informa UK Limited, 2010-01-01)
This article sets out to examine the linkages between the media and politics in Turkey. It argues that, rooted in the world of politics from the outset, Turkish media has always been marked by a high degree of political parallelism. As regulator and funder, the state, making up the political majority, exerted strong control over the media. In the 1990s, the shift to a globalized market and the explosive growth of private broadcasting did not decrease the high degree of political parallelism. Instead, it ena...
Examining hate speech from the perspective of Arendt’s political theory
Binbuğa, Burcu Nur (Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi (Ankara, Turkey), 2016-12)
This paper intends to contribute debate on hate speech from the perspective of political theory derived from Hannah Arendt’s theoretical works. Although Arendt does not deal with hate speech head-on, her theory has been selected for this study partly due to the strong emphasis on speech as a precondition for being a part of public life and political being. This study argues that although Arendt would have certain reservations about the restriction of hate speech, her conceptual framework gives us clues...
Conscientious objection: a contestation of citizenship in Turkey
Sapmaz, Semih; Çırakman Deveci, Aslı; Department of Political Science and Public Administration (2012)
This thesis discusses the politics of conscientious objection in Turkey within a framework of citizenship. In this study citizenship is identified with being political and conceived as a process comprised of acts and practices. According to this conception, while practices reproduce the discourse of citizenship in a given context, acts are the deeds that challenge this discourse. Conscription, within this framework, is defined as a citizenship practice which re/produces the militaristic, nationalistic and g...
Critical acts without a critical mass: The substantive representation of women in the Turkish parliament
Ayata, Ayşe (2008-07-01)
Drawing upon in-depth interviews with 20 women MPs and parliamentary debates during the amendment of the Turkish Civil and Penal Codes, we elaborate on the possibility and conditions of women's impact on politics without their constituting a critical mass in the parliament. Our research reveals that when state machinery, women's machinery, and supra-national agencies have created a conducive context, as in the case of the last decade in Turkey, the substantive representation of women's issues become possibl...
Success factors in public information systems outsourcing : a case study
Vural, İlkay; Bilgen, Semih; Department of Information Systems (2004)
In this thesis, a public IS outsourcing case in Turkey is examined. The case is selected because of its unique characteristics that differentiate it from the other cases studied in the literature. The aim of this study is to understand the success factors in public IS outsourcing and to reveal which ones were applied in this specific case.
Citation Formats
C. Deveci, “Nationalist bias in Turkish official discourse on hate speech: a Rawlsian criticism,” TURKISH STUDIES, pp. 26–48, 2019, Accessed: 00, 2020. [Online]. Available: