Nationalist bias in Turkish official discourse on hate speech: a Rawlsian criticism

Date

2019-01-01

Author

Deveci, Cem

Metadata

Show full item record

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Item Usage Stats

133
views

0
downloads

This article analyzes the approach in Turkey on hate speech by evaluating legal regulations, decisions and public responses. We argue that the Turkish case cultivates neither a lenient, nor a restrictive response to hate speech, because a strong nationalist bias seems to be at work in interpreting, penalizing or allowing hate speech. The peculiarity of the Turkish case stems from a prejudice that hate speech might be conducted only against the nation, unity of the state, or the principles of regime, rather than against vulnerable groups or identities. By focusing on the Hrant Dink case among others we try to demonstrate the most striking example of this prejudice.

Subject Keywords

Turkish politics, Hrant Dink, Minorities, Political justice, Freedom of speech; , Nationalism, Hate speech

URI

https://hdl.handle.net/11511/32922

Journal

TURKISH STUDIES

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1080/14683849.2018.1479961

Collections

Department of Political Science and Public Administration, Article

Suggestions

OpenMETU
Core

Politics and the Mass Media in Turkey Kaya, Ahmet Raşit; Çakmur, Barış (Informa UK Limited, 2010-01-01) This article sets out to examine the linkages between the media and politics in Turkey. It argues that, rooted in the world of politics from the outset, Turkish media has always been marked by a high degree of political parallelism. As regulator and funder, the state, making up the political majority, exerted strong control over the media. In the 1990s, the shift to a globalized market and the explosive growth of private broadcasting did not decrease the high degree of political parallelism. Instead, it ena...
Examining hate speech from the perspective of Arendt’s political theory Binbuğa, Burcu Nur (Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi (Ankara, Turkey), 2016-12) This paper intends to contribute debate on hate speech from the perspective of political theory derived from Hannah Arendt’s theoretical works. Although Arendt does not deal with hate speech head-on, her theory has been selected for this study partly due to the strong emphasis on speech as a precondition for being a part of public life and political being. This study argues that although Arendt would have certain reservations about the restriction of hate speech, her conceptual framework gives us clues...
Critical acts without a critical mass: The substantive representation of women in the Turkish parliament Ayata, Ayşe (2008-07-01) Drawing upon in-depth interviews with 20 women MPs and parliamentary debates during the amendment of the Turkish Civil and Penal Codes, we elaborate on the possibility and conditions of women's impact on politics without their constituting a critical mass in the parliament. Our research reveals that when state machinery, women's machinery, and supra-national agencies have created a conducive context, as in the case of the last decade in Turkey, the substantive representation of women's issues become possibl...
Success factors in public information systems outsourcing : a case study Vural, İlkay; Bilgen, Semih; Department of Information Systems (2004) In this thesis, a public IS outsourcing case in Turkey is examined. The case is selected because of its unique characteristics that differentiate it from the other cases studied in the literature. The aim of this study is to understand the success factors in public IS outsourcing and to reveal which ones were applied in this specific case.
The 'politics of intimate' at the intersection of neo-liberalism and neo-conservatism in contemporary Turkey Acar, Feride; Altunok, Gülbanu (2013-11-01) This paper aims to review the 'politics of the intimate' in the Turkish context. By looking at regulations and policy debates in the areas of sexuality, reproduction and family and partnership in the 2000s, it critically analyzes the scope and content of state policies, as well as the policy debates in these areas, from a gender and gender equality perspective. This analysis further emphasizes the interaction between neo-liberalism and neo-conservatism, two political rationalities that have come to play imp...

Citation Formats

C. Deveci, “Nationalist bias in Turkish official discourse on hate speech: a Rawlsian criticism,” TURKISH STUDIES, pp. 26–48, 2019, Accessed: 00, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://hdl.handle.net/11511/32922.