Geç Osmanlıdan Erken Cumhuriyete İç Batı Anadolu’da Kentsel Yapının Değişimi: Manisa, Afyon, Burdur Ve Isparta Kentleri Üzerine Karşılaştırmalı Bir İnceleme

Download
2012-12-1
Çetin, Sıdıka
The central authority consolidated more with the Tanzimat, set forth a comprehensive and systematic modernization project in cities connected with ports and railways, particularly in the capital city of Istanbul. The most obvious transformation projection of the Tanzimat reforms in city centers is the emergence of a public center. Public areas as locations of government houses, municipalities, jails, banks, schools, police stations, military posts were located side by side at the new commercial centers. Besides, as a consequence of the socio-economic transformations at the end of the 19th century, production facilities such as workshop, factory, warehouse, management offices, buildings of insurance and banking operations came into picture. Those were located in the vicinity of traditional bazaar, in the new commercial center. In this period, the differentiation in housing was also prominent. Large parts of cities subjected to fires and new settlement areas for immigrants of wars were planned explicitly with modern urban understanding. In the Republican era, executive authorities were determined to modernize in an integral understanding. The central government by legal framework and institutions had the mission of 'building a nation'. For its realization, the space of the country had to be converted into national space. Therefore, there necessitated urban master arrangements in a Western sense. Being constructed as a contemporary capital, Ankara is seen as the implementation area of the new bourgeoisie culture and life; institutional and daily life practices deducted from the Ankara experience are desired to be implemented gradually in all other cities. Starting from the enaction of Building and Roads Law in 1933, there started a new era where new implementations are observed in urban planning field al through Turkey. With plans, the most underdeveloped parts of the country were aimed to have a contemporary appearance. However, the Western Anatolian cities a large majority of which were burnt down during the war, were already undergoing a re-construction process since 1923, albeit with the old approaches. Modern approaches resulted in fundamental changes in both Late Ottoman and Early Republican Eras were implemented widely in cities that had ports and railway connections after the Tanzimat reforms, and in several cities and towns, with the new construction regulations of the Republican regime.. However, for some reason it is possible to say that for the first period Istanbul and for the second period Ankara centered the prevailing discussions. In this review, the focus is given to four urban city centers (Manisa, Afyon, Burdur, Isparta) located in Central Western Anatolia. Within this framework, this article investigates, (a) the fundamental changes in cities as a result of reforms in the Late Ottoman era; (b) the searches for the modernization of cities and their effect on Anatolian cities in alignment with the legal arrangements achieved by the determination of building a new nation state in Early Republican Era, resting on the plans of four cities selected in a comparative way. As a draw of the research it is concluded that the development of the four cities in Late Ottoman era and the planning of the Early Republican Era, have similarities since they are achieved in the context of modernization. For instance, government centers envisaged as a space organization preserve their place in the urban integrity in the succeeding periods. This is an indication of the continuity. However, there are stylistic differences between the modernizations of these two periods. The characteristics of the buildings, architectural language, typology and their arrangement on space are different. The Republican modernization aimed public modernization in space and secularization, and gave importance to hygiene, public health, 'grandeur' and functionality aspects. There exists similarities and differences within the Early Republican Era itself. In all four cities government centers created in the preceeding era continued to be used as the urban center, however, it changed in the style and form with the open space arrangements and squares that had distinct modernizing effects. Linear axis that links Government Square to the Station and the public buildings along is the indispensible part of the integrity in every city. The compliance of plans to the zoning principles and modern housing neighborhood proposals in "garden city" style comprise the common features in the plans under concern. However, the preparation of these plans by experts with different approaches resulted in a diversity of the implementations. The facts that the last two plans prepared in 1940s are relatively more conservative when compared with the first two, and the preservation of the traditional housing areas, are the most distinct differences. Besides, another diversity is that the city is integrally considered in only the last two plans, while it is limited to specific axis of develepment in the early two cities. These data led the close scrunity of the changes in urban spaces from the Late Ottoman to the Early Republic, which gives us a fundamental point of view regarding the determined period. Besides, it provides different approaches for the reevaluation of some stereotyped thoughts; however, for comprehensive generalizations, research on more plans prepared in the same period and implemented in different geographic regions, is needed.

Suggestions

Making the "heart" of Russian territorialization: railways and Moscow railway stations
Alptekin, Ali Haydar; Erkal, Namık Günay; Altan, Tomris Elvan; Department of History of Architecture (2010)
This thesis aims to analyze the role of railways and railway stations in the construction of the capital city of an industrial empire with reference to the concept of “territorialization.” The main case is Russia, where the geographical factors are prominent in the creation of the economic, political, social and cultural structure of the country; and the focus of analysis is the city of Moscow, which acted as the center of this structure as connected to its territory by a developed system of railways. The c...
The Residential architecture of ankara during the 1920s: the housing types in the settlement zones of the new capital city
Avcı Hosanlı, Deniz; Altan, Tomris Elvan (2018-12-01)
The focus of this paper is the residential architecture of the capital city Ankara during the 1920s, which is investigated as part of the development of the city after the foundation of the Turkish Republic. It initially defines the main settlement zones of contemporary Ankara that transformed and were formed in relation with the contemporary development plans implemented to direct the urban growth. The construction of new single houses and apartments as the main housing types of the period in the defined s...
The Production of Space during the Period of Autonomy: Notes on Belgrade Urban Space, 1817-67
Aytekin, Erden Attila (2016-12-01)
The nascent Serbian state and processes of de-Ottomanization should not be seen as the sole determinants of the development of urban space in Belgrade in the 19th century. Using Lefebvre's conceptual categories, this paper argues that both Ottoman and Serbian authorities waged a struggle over the city through the creation of dominated and symbolic spaces, and the capital with its abstract spaces left its mark on the city. Moreover, the Christian, Muslim and Jewish inhabitants of the city contributed to the ...
Changing Perspectives on the Planning of Ankara 1924 2007 and Lessons for a New Master Planning Approach to Developing Cities
Çalışkan, Olgu (2009-11-01)
As one of the newly planned capitals in the 20th century - like Islamabad, Canberra and Brazil-, Ankara represents an original case in planning history: from shaping a new town under the influence of early European urbanism to the control of a dynamic metropolitan form by structural planning approaches. Forming its urban core according to the initial planning perspectives between the beginning of 1930s and the mid-1970s, the city has entered a rapid phase of space production in its extensions for about the ...
Architecture of the state: Ankara istasyon caddesi in the late ottoman and early republican periods
Dedekargınoğlu, Cem; Altan, T. Elvan.; Department of History of Architecture (2019)
This study focuses on the late 19th and early 20th century urban transformation of Ankara as exemplified in the development of the axis connecting the train station to the city center. The temporal scope of the research starts with the 1890s when the train station was constructed and its connection with the city was established, and ends at the turn of the 1930s until when a number of buildings were erected on the İstasyon Caddesi axis, and when Jansen’s proposal for the development plan of Ankara started t...
Citation Formats
S. Çetin, “Geç Osmanlıdan Erken Cumhuriyete İç Batı Anadolu’da Kentsel Yapının Değişimi: Manisa, Afyon, Burdur Ve Isparta Kentleri Üzerine Karşılaştırmalı Bir İnceleme,” ODTÜ Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 89–126, 2012, Accessed: 00, 2020. [Online]. Available: http://jfa.arch.metu.edu.tr/archive/0258-5316/2012/cilt29/sayi_2/89-126.pdf.