Show/Hide Menu
Hide/Show Apps
Logout
Türkçe
Türkçe
Search
Search
Login
Login
OpenMETU
OpenMETU
About
About
Open Science Policy
Open Science Policy
Open Access Guideline
Open Access Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Communities & Collections
Communities & Collections
Help
Help
Frequently Asked Questions
Frequently Asked Questions
Guides
Guides
Thesis submission
Thesis submission
MS without thesis term project submission
MS without thesis term project submission
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission
Publication submission
Supporting Information
Supporting Information
General Information
General Information
Copyright, Embargo and License
Copyright, Embargo and License
Contact us
Contact us
Evaluating the mine plan alternatives with respect to bottom-up and top-down sustainability criteria
Date
2017-11-20
Author
Yaylaci, Evren Deniz
Düzgün, Hafize Şebnem
Metadata
Show full item record
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License
.
Item Usage Stats
263
views
0
downloads
Cite This
The previous researches on sustainability evaluation for the mining sector indicate that the tailor-made integrated frameworks should have the capabilities of integrating the stakeholder-focused information as effectively as operational information into the evaluation and reporting process. In this regard, this paper proposes an indicator-based quantitative evaluation framework for integrating the concerns and priorities of the local stakeholders into the evaluation of sustainability in the mining sector operations and/or plans. The proposed framework allows one for assessing how the sustainability evaluation outcomes may differ if the project specific concerns and priorities are determined by the local stakeholders or by the operational reporting party, like the mining company or the planning authority. The proposed framework is implemented with the case study of Afsin-Elbistan Coal Basin (AECB) in Turkey. The future mine plan alternatives and current operations in AECB are evaluated and compared in terms of locals' and decision-makers' sustainability criteria. The results of the study show that the level of sustainability in the AECB, in other words, the contribution of the mining sector operations to sustainable development in the AECB diverse considerably based on the used sustainability criteria for the analysis. Therefore, consideration of the local sustainability criteria is necessary in order to prevent the unsound actions in terms of sustainability and contribute the sustainable development at the local-level.
Subject Keywords
Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
,
Strategy and Management
,
Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
,
General Environmental Science
URI
https://hdl.handle.net/11511/52126
Journal
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.248
Collections
Department of Mining Engineering, Article
Suggestions
OpenMETU
Core
An effective framework for life cycle and cost assessment for marine vessels aiming to select optimal propulsion systems
Jeong, Byongug; Wang, Haibin; Oğuz, Elif; Zhou, Peilin (Elsevier BV, 2018-06-20)
By adopting the concept of modularity, this paper introduced an optimal framework which facilitates life cycle assessment and life cycle cost assessment, thereby supporting rapid and reliable decision-making in the marine industry. The benefits of the proposed framework were discussed through two case studies where the optimal configurations of marine propulsion systems were determined from the economic and environmental perspectives. First, the performance of a short-route ferry using the hybrid system was...
Non-thermal production of pure hydrogen from biomass: HYVOLUTION
Claassen, Pieternel A. M.; de Vrije, Truus; Koukios, Emmanuel; van Niel, Ed; Eroğlu, İnci; Modigell, Michael; Friedl, Anton; Wukovits, Walter; Ahrer, Werner (Elsevier BV, 2010-01-01)
The objectives and methodology of the EU-funded research project HYVOLUTION devoted to hydrogen production from biomass are reviewed.
Determination of groundwater threshold values: A methodological approach
Bulut, Onur F.; Duru, Burcu; Cakmak, Ozgur; Gunhan, Ozgur; Dilek, Filiz Bengü; Yetiş, Ülkü (Elsevier BV, 2020-04-20)
This article is concerned with the establishment of natural background levels and threshold values for naturally-occurring parameters in groundwaters in the absence of relevant and accurate long-term spatial data. A new approach was developed and exemplified, adopting the groundwaters of the Gediz River Basin, Turkey, as a case study. The available groundwater monitoring data was from a one-year seasonal water quality monitoring campaign. The approach used combines pre-selection, selection and statistical e...
A methodology for evaluating environmental co-benefits in the transport sector: application to the Delhi metro
Doll, Christopher N. H.; Balaban, Osman (Elsevier BV, 2013-11-01)
This paper presents a methodology to measure the environmental co-benefits of transport initiatives, defined here as carbon emissions in conjunction with local air pollution. An evaluation tool was developed and then tested on the case of the Delhi metro. The metro is an extensive rail project spanning the Indian capital, which is also the world's first rail based Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) project. However, it has also been a flashpoint in urban policy-making in the city in recent years. This analys...
Comparative study of factors affecting public acceptance of mining projects: Evidence from USA, China and Turkey
Que, Sisi; Awuah-Offei, Kwame; Demirel, Ayhan; Wang, Liang; Demirel, Nuray; Chen, Yao (Elsevier BV, 2019-11-10)
Discrete choice theory has been shown to be a viable way to study individual preferences for resource development. However, only a limited amount of literature assesses the effect of culture, socio-economic, historical, and regulatory factors on the classification of factors that are important to individual preferences for resource development used in designing valid discrete choice experiments. This work seeks to assess differences in the levels of importance among the determinants of public acceptance of ...
Citation Formats
IEEE
ACM
APA
CHICAGO
MLA
BibTeX
E. D. Yaylaci and H. Ş. Düzgün, “Evaluating the mine plan alternatives with respect to bottom-up and top-down sustainability criteria,”
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
, pp. 837–849, 2017, Accessed: 00, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://hdl.handle.net/11511/52126.