Show/Hide Menu
Hide/Show Apps
Logout
Türkçe
Türkçe
Search
Search
Login
Login
OpenMETU
OpenMETU
About
About
Open Science Policy
Open Science Policy
Open Access Guideline
Open Access Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Communities & Collections
Communities & Collections
Help
Help
Frequently Asked Questions
Frequently Asked Questions
Guides
Guides
Thesis submission
Thesis submission
MS without thesis term project submission
MS without thesis term project submission
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission
Publication submission
Supporting Information
Supporting Information
General Information
General Information
Copyright, Embargo and License
Copyright, Embargo and License
Contact us
Contact us
The state and civil rights in the late Ottoman Empire
Date
2003-01-01
Author
Ergut, Ferdan
Metadata
Show full item record
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License
.
Item Usage Stats
164
views
0
downloads
Cite This
This paper argues that civil rights can only have a substantial meaning in the context of bureaucratic modern states. It examines the emergence of civil rights in the late Ottoman Empire, during the period of the Committee of Union and Progress--CUP (1908-1918). The CUP period is exemplary in that it witnessed the establishment of the category of citizen as a by-product of the political struggles which started to revolve around the defense of civil liberties against the authority of a centralizing state. Since one of the major state responses to this evolving political process is regulating public gatherings and associations, they are analyzed as illuminating the 'bargain' between the state and societal forces over civil rights. By observing the changes made in these regulations over a decade, the paper attempts to better clarify the dialectical relationship between policing the collective action by the state on the one hand and the institutionalization of civil rights on the other.
URI
https://hdl.handle.net/11511/53376
Journal
JOURNAL OF MEDITERRANEAN STUDIES
Collections
Department of History, Article
Suggestions
OpenMETU
Core
The political ir/relevance of freedom in the philosophies of Sartre and Arendt
Kara, Onur; Deveci, Cem; Department of Political Science and Public Administration (2011)
This study examines the concept of freedom in the philosophies of Jean Paul Sartre and Hannah Arendt in the context of their relevance or irrelevance to politics in the context of political freedom, political activity, rights and responsibilities, individuality, plurality and humanism. The major concern is to question the possibilities of political reflection of their conceptions of freedom. In this respect, the study explicates densely enough Sartre's and Arendt's conceptions of freedom respectively and in...
The power effects of human rights reforms in Turkey: enhanced surveillance and depoliticisation
Bahçecik, Şerif Onur (2015-06-03)
While the perspective of 'liberalism of fear' assumes that human rights limit the despotic power of the state, this paper argues that human rights reforms promoted in the context of institution- and capacity-building programmes have had significant power effects by enhancing the disciplinary capacities of the Turkish state and blunting the transformative potential of rights claiming. The reforms increased state surveillance by rechanneling criminal justice processes towards producing evidence (such as telec...
The will of the sovereign and contract in thomas hobbes and john locke
Atasoy, Tanay; Turan, Şeref Halil; Department of Philosophy (2008)
This study mainly investigates the reason of living in civil society, the motives of people to live under the government and necessity of commonwealth by design to live in peace based on modern social contract theories of Hobbes and Locke. Hobbes has a decisive role for developing a western political thought and Locke goes a step further to put superiority of the community and latitude of thought in his theory. In order to examine these topics, similarities of both philosophers in terms of their effort on s...
The question of freedom in political philosophies of thomas hobbes and jean-jacques rousseau
Yiğit, Pervin; Turan, ŞHalil; Department of Philosophy (2007)
This thesis aims to examine the question of freedom in its relation to political authority in social contract theories of Thomas Hobbes (1588-1679) and Jean-Jacques Rousseau (1712-1778). In order to do that, discussions on human nature, evolution into political association and the foundations of legitimate governments are focused on. As the social contract theories of Hobbes and Rousseau mainly seek for rational justification of political obligation, the primary aim of this thesis is to analyze the nature o...
The real and the imaginary thresholds of ottoman subjectivity
Taştan, Coşkun; Taştan, Coşkun; Department of Sociology (2010)
This work examines the nature of frames that restrict our perspectives and thus give birth to such sociological entities like societies, communities and nations. How is the dualism of “inside-outside” created on sociological and psychic levels? More importantly, what instruments play what kind of roles in the creation of that dualism? Examining the formation of Ottoman subjectivity as a case, this study gives original answers to these questions. The psychoanalytic theory, which opened a new methodological d...
Citation Formats
IEEE
ACM
APA
CHICAGO
MLA
BibTeX
F. Ergut, “The state and civil rights in the late Ottoman Empire,”
JOURNAL OF MEDITERRANEAN STUDIES
, pp. 53–74, 2003, Accessed: 00, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://hdl.handle.net/11511/53376.