A Cartesian Rereading of Badiou's Political Subjectivity

Date

2019-12-01

Author

Grıffıth, James Edmond Carr

Metadata

Show full item record

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Item Usage Stats

206
views

0
downloads

This article traces the consequences for Badiou's political subjectivity if his understanding of the Cartesian subject is incorrect. For Badiou, the faithful subject, political and otherwise, is formed through fidelity to the appearance of an event of truth, and the process of this fidelity creates a world. These truths are immanent to the worlds in which they appear. An obscure subject, however, is faithful to a negation, while a reactive subject denies the appearance of a truth's event. Badiou's subject radicalizes Lacan's radicalization of the Cartesian subject, but for him both Descartes and Lacan consider the subject stable since they are caused by truth rather than by the event of a truth. However, immanent to Descartes's philosophy is an unstable subject, thanks to the role of the imagination in the discovery of the cogito. Fidelity to this immanent Cartesian subject shows Lacan as an obscure subject and Badiou as reactive.

Subject Keywords

Philosophy

URI

https://hdl.handle.net/11511/56358

Journal

PHILOSOPHY TODAY

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5840/philtoday201925244

Collections

Department of Philosophy, Article

Suggestions

OpenMETU
Core

On the possibility of wittgensteinian language of ethics Oktar, Sibel; Turan, Şeref Halil; Department of Philosophy (2008) In this study, the standpoint that discourse on ethics is impossible is examined. As Ludwig Wittgenstein is the first philosopher who explicitly said that ethics is inexpressible, the main concentration is on Wittgenstein’s conception of ethics. Analytic philosophy’s questions regarding ethics are about the meaning of the expressions of value rather than conduct. It is generally recognized that the distinction between these questions and the emphasis on the definition of value judgements starts with G.E. Mo...
The problem of justice in the philosophies of Rousseau and Kant Ünlü, Özlem; Turan, Şeref Halil; Department of Philosophy (2011) The aim of this study is to make a comparison between Rousseau’s and Kant’s theory of justice. This thesis defends the arguments of Rousseau’s democratic political theory against the claims raised by Kant. Rousseau and Kant formulate how to relieve the tension between individual and society. This tension is the one between individual and political freedom. Rousseau calls it the tension between moral and political freedom and Kant terms it as internal and external freedom. However, Rousseau ensures continuit...
A discussion on how to formulate the question of contingency in Leibniz's system: a logical approach Besler, Arman; Grünberg, David; Department of Philosophy (2008) The main objective of this study is to shed light on some difficulties involved in the formulation of the problem of contingency in Leibniz’s philosophical system. Leibniz’s mature philosophy is characterized by the solutions he proposes for this problem, and the ontological ideas underlying or assisting them. ‘The problem of contingency’ refers to the tension between his conceptual containment theory of truth and his claim that true existential propositions that is, propositions which concern actual indiv...
A Critical reading of Alan Badiou: relativism in Badiou's theory of truth Yenisoy Şahin, Eylem; Turan, Şeref Halil; Department of Philosophy (2012) The purpose of this thesis is to develop a critical reading of Badiou’s theory of truth. Contemporary popular trends such as postmodernism and anti-philosophy champion the principles of pluralism and contingency. They use these against Hegel’s conception of history and theory of ‘relational totality’. Badiou agrees with these trends. But he criticizes their relativist theory of truth. He wants to provide an ‘objective’ foundation for ‘truth’. The question I wish to explore in this thesis is then to analyze ...
A study of the self in Nietzsche's fatalistic universe of eternal recurrence Canbolat, Argun Abrek; Parkan, Barış; Department of Philosophy (2009) The doctrine of eternal recurrence is not only an aspect of Nietzsche’s philosophy, but a notion that structures the base of his philosophy. The doctrine is analyzed by many interpreters in various ways. The cosmological and the ethical-existential approaches to the doctrine are at the very base wrong. The doctrine’s impact cannot be adequately understood in these terms. Besides, the doctrine of eternal recurrence has multiple problems within it, problems which can be solved if the doctrine is understood an...

Citation Formats

J. E. C. Grıffıth, “A Cartesian Rereading of Badiou’s Political Subjectivity,” PHILOSOPHY TODAY, pp. 93–100, 2019, Accessed: 00, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://hdl.handle.net/11511/56358.