Managed honey bee colony losses in Canada, China, Europe, Israel and Turkey, for the winters of 2008-9 and 2009-10

Download
2012-01-01
van der Zee, Romee
Pisa, Lennard
Andonov, Sreten
Brodschneider, Robert
Charriere, Jean-Daniel
Chlebo, Robert
Coffey, Mary F.
Crailsheim, Karl
Dahle, Bjorn
Gajda, Anna
Gray, Alison
Drazic, Marica M.
Higes, Mariano
Kauko, Lassi
Kence, Aykut
Kence, Meral
Kezic, Nicola
Kiprijanovska, Hrisula
Kralj, Jasna
Kristiansen, Preben
Martin Hernandez, Raquel
Mutinelli, Franco
Bach Kim Nguyen, Bach Kim Nguyen
Otten, Christoph
ÖZKIRIM, ASLI
Pernal, Stephen F.
Peterson, Magnus
Ramsay, Gavin
Santrac, Violeta
Soroker, Victoria
Topolska, Grazyna
Uzunov, Aleksandar
Vejsnaes, Flemming
Wei, Shi
Wilkins, Selwyn
In 2008 the COLOSS network was formed by honey bee experts from Europe and the USA. The primary objectives set by this scientific network were to explain and to prevent large scale losses of honey bee (Apis mellifera) colonies. In June 2008 COLOSS obtained four years support from the European Union from COST and was designated as COST Action FA0803 - COLOSS (Prevention of honey bee COlony LOSSes). To enable the comparison of loss data between participating countries, a standardized COLOSS questionnaire was developed. Using this questionnaire information on honey bee losses has been collected over two years. Survey data presented in this study were gathered in 2009 from 12 countries and in 2010 from 24 countries. Mean honey bee losses in Europe varied widely, between 7-22% over the 2008-9 winter and between 7-30% over the 2009-10 winter. An important finding is that for all countries which participated in 2008-9, winter losses in 2009-10 were found to be substantially higher. In 2009-10, winter losses in South East Europe were at such a low level that the factors causing the losses in other parts of Europe were absent, or at a level which did not affect colony survival. The five provinces of China, which were included in 2009-10, showed very low mean (4%) A. mellifera winter losses. In six Canadian provinces, mean winter losses in 2010 varied between 16-25%, losses in Nova Scotia (40%) being exceptionally high. In most countries and in both monitoring years, hobbyist beekeepers (1-50 colonies) experienced higher losses than practitioners with intermediate beekeeping operations (51-500 colonies). This relationship between scale of beekeeping and extent of losses effect was also observed in 2009-10, but was less pronounced. In Belgium, Italy, the Netherlands and Poland, 2008-9 mean winter losses for beekeepers who reported 'disappeared' colonies were significantly higher compared to mean winter losses of beekeepers who did not report 'disappeared' colonies. Mean 2008-9 winter losses for those beekeepers in the Netherlands who reported symptoms similar to "Colony Collapse Disorder" (CCD), namely: 1. no dead bees in or surrounding the hive while; 2. capped brood was present, were significantly higher than mean winter losses for those beekeepers who reported 'disappeared' colonies without the presence of capped brood in the empty hives. In the winter of 2009-10 in the majority of participating countries, beekeepers who reported 'disappeared' colonies experienced higher winter losses compared with beekeepers, who experienced winter losses but did not report 'disappeared' colonies.
JOURNAL OF APICULTURAL RESEARCH

Suggestions

Differential diagnosis of the honey bee trypanosomatids Crithidia mellificae and Lotmaria passim
Ravoet, Jorgen; Schwarz, Ryan S.; Descamps, Tine; Yanez, Orlando; Tozkar, Cansu Ozge; Martin-Hernandez, Raquel; Bartolome, Carolina; De Smet, Lina; Higes, Mariano; Wenseleers, Tom; Schmid-Hempel, Regula; Neumann, Peter; Kadowaki, Tatsuhiko; Evans, Jay D.; de Graaf, Dirk C. (2015-09-01)
Trypanosomatids infecting honey bees have been poorly studied with molecular methods until recently. After the description of Crithidia mellificae (Langridge and McGhee, 1967) it took about forty years until molecular data for honey bee trypanosomatids became available and were used to identify and describe a new trypanosomatid species from honey bees, Lotmaria passim (Evans and Schwarz, 2014). However, an easy method to distinguish them without sequencing is not yet available. Research on the related bumbl...
A review of methods for discrimination of honey bee populations as applied to European beekeeping
Bouga, Maria; et. al. (2011-01-01)
Here, scientists from 19 European countries, most of them collaborating in Working Group 4: "Diversity and Vitality" of COST Action FA 0803 "Prevention of honey bee COlony LOSSes" (COLOSS), review the methodology applied in each country for discriminating between honey bee populations. Morphometric analyses (classical and geometric) and different molecular markers have been applied. Even if the approach has been similar, however, different methodologies regarding measurements, landmarks or molecular markers...
Behavioral and molecular impact of a stress factor, acaricide perizin on honey bees (apis mellifera) of Turkey
Arslan, Okan Can; Adalı, Orhan; Department of Biology (2020-9)
The effects of acaricide Perizin (coumaphos as the active ingredient) which is used against parasitic mite, Varroa destructor, on three native honey bee subspecies; Apis mellifera caucasica, A. m. carnica and A. m. syriaca. in terms of behavioral, molecular, and genetic aspects were investigated. After acute sub-lethal exposure to various doses of coumaphos, the worker bees of control and treatment groups were subjected to activity monitoring tests for evaluation of locomotor activity, electric shock ...
Honey Bee Diversity Is Swayed by Migratory Beekeeping and Trade Despite Conservation Practices: Genetic Evidence for the Impact of Anthropogenic Factors on Population Structure
Kükrer, Mert; Kence, Aykut (2021-04-15)
The intense admixture of honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) populations at a global scale is mostly attributed to the widespread migratory beekeeping practices and replacement of queens and colonies with non-native races or hybrids of different subspecies. These practices are also common in Anatolia and Thrace, but their influence on the genetic make-up of the five native subspecies of honey bees has not been explored. Here, we present an analysis of 30 microsatellite markers from honey bees from six different r...
Effect of host country and project conditions in international construction joint ventures
ÖZORHON ORAKÇAL, BELİZ; Arditi, David; Dikmen Toker, İrem; Birgönül, Mustafa Talat (2007-11-01)
Joint ventures (JVs) have become popular because of their importance as a strategic alternative in global competition. International joint ventures (IJVs) are difficult to manage due to their complex structures involving more than two entities having different and competing objectives and strategies. Since each construction project is unique, project-specific factors are significant for the success of an IJV as well as the risks associated with the host country in which the IJV operates. In this study, the ...
Citation Formats
R. van der Zee et al., “Managed honey bee colony losses in Canada, China, Europe, Israel and Turkey, for the winters of 2008-9 and 2009-10,” JOURNAL OF APICULTURAL RESEARCH, pp. 91–114, 2012, Accessed: 00, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://hdl.handle.net/11511/56935.