The sixth visual object tracking VOT2018 challenge results

Download
2019-01-01
Kristan, Matej
Leonardis, Aleš
Matas, Jiří
Felsberg, Michael
Pflugfelder, Roman
Zajc, Luka Čehovin
Vojír̃, Tomáš
Bhat, Goutam
Lukežič, Alan
Eldesokey, Abdelrahman
Fernández, Gustavo
García-Martín, Álvaro
Iglesias-Arias, Álvaro
Alatan, Abdullah Aydın
González-García, Abel
Petrosino, Alfredo
Memarmoghadam, Alireza
Vedaldi, Andrea
Muhič, Andrej
He, Anfeng
Smeulders, Arnold
Perera, Asanka G.
Li, Bo
Chen, Boyu
Kim, Changick
Xu, Changsheng
Xiong, Changzhen
Tian, Cheng
Luo, Chong
Sun, Chong
Hao, Cong
Kim, Daijin
Mishra, Deepak
Chen, Deming
Wang, Dong
Wee, Dongyoon
Gavves, Efstratios
Gundogdu, Erhan
Velasco-Salido, Erik
Khan, Fahad Shahbaz
Yang, Fan
Zhao, Fei
Li, Feng
Battistone, Francesco
De Ath, George
Subrahmanyam, Gorthi R. K. S.
Bastos, Guilherme
Ling, Haibin
Galoogahi, Hamed Kiani
Lee, Hankyeol
Li, Haojie
Zhao, Haojie
Fan, Heng
Zhang, Honggang
Possegger, Horst
Li, Houqiang
Lu, Huchuan
Zhi, Hui
Li, Huiyun
Lee, Hyemin
Chang, Hyung Jin
Drummond, Isabela
Valmadre, Jack
Martin, Jaime Spencer
Chahl, Javaan
Choi, Jin Young
Li, Jing
Wang, Jinqiao
Qi, Jinqing
Sung, Jinyoung
Johnander, Joakim
Henriques, Joao
Choi, Jongwon
van de Weijer, Joost
Herranz, Jorge Rodríguez
Martínez, José M.
Kittler, Josef
Zhuang, Junfei
Gao, Junyu
Grm, Klemen
Zhang, Lichao
Wang, Lijun
Yang, Lingxiao
Rout, Litu
Si, Liu
Bertinetto, Luca
Chu, Lutao
Che, Manqiang
Maresca, Mario Edoardo
Danelljan, Martin
Yang, Ming-Hsuan
Abdelpakey, Mohamed
Shehata, Mohamed
Kang, Myunggu
Lee, Namhoon
Wang, Ning
Miksik, Ondrej
Moallem, P.
Vicente-Moñivar, Pablo
Senna, Pedro
Li, Peixia
Torr, Philip
Raju, Priya Mariam
Ruihe, Qian
Wang, Qiang
Zhou, Qin
Guo, Qing
Martín-Nieto, Rafael
Gorthi, Rama Krishna
Tao, Ran
Bowden, Richard
Everson, Richard
Wang, Runling
Yun, Sangdoo
Choi, Seokeon
Vivas, Sergio
Bai, Shuai
Huang, Shuangping
Wu, Sihang
Hadfield, Simon
Wang, Siwen
Golodetz, Stuart
Ming, Tang
Xu, Tianyang
Zhang, Tianzhu
Fischer, Tobias
Santopietro, Vincenzo
Štruc, Vitomir
Wei, Wang
Zuo, Wangmeng
Feng, Wei
Wu, Wei
Zou, Wei
Hu, Weiming
Zhou, Wengang
Zeng, Wenjun
Zhang, Xiaofan
Wu, Xiaohe
Wu, Xiao-Jun
Tian, Xinmei
Li, Yan
Lu, Yan
Law, Yee Wei
Wu, Yi
Demiris, Yiannis
Yang, Yicai
Jiao, Yifan
Li, Yuhong
Zhang, Yunhua
Sun, Yuxuan
Zhang, Zheng
Zhu, Zheng
Feng, Zhen-Hua
Wang, Zhihui
He, Zhiqun
The Visual Object Tracking challenge VOT2018 is the sixth annual tracker benchmarking activity organized by the VOT initiative. Results of over eighty trackers are presented; many are state-of-the-art trackers published at major computer vision conferences or in journals in the recent years. The evaluation included the standard VOT and other popular methodologies for short-term tracking analysis and a “real-time” experiment simulating a situation where a tracker processes images as if provided by a continuously running sensor. A long-term tracking subchallenge has been introduced to the set of standard VOT sub-challenges. The new subchallenge focuses on long-term tracking properties, namely coping with target disappearance and reappearance. A new dataset has been compiled and a performance evaluation methodology that focuses on long-term tracking capabilities has been adopted. The VOT toolkit has been updated to support both standard short-term and the new long-term tracking subchallenges. Performance of the tested trackers typically by far exceeds standard baselines. The source code for most of the trackers is publicly available from the VOT page. The dataset, the evaluation kit and the results are publicly available at the challenge website (http://votchallenge.net).

Suggestions

The Visual Object Tracking VOT2017 Challenge Results
Alatan, Abdullah Aydın (2017-10-29)
The Visual Object Tracking challenge 2015, VOT2015, aims at comparing short-term single-object visual trackers that do not apply pre-learned models of object appearance. Results of 62 trackers are presented. The number of tested trackers makes VOT 2015 the largest benchmark on shortterm tracking to date. For each participating tracker, a short description is provided in the appendix. Features of the VOT2015 challenge that go beyond its VOT2014 predecessor are: (i) a new VOT2015 dataset twice as large as in ...
The Visual Object Tracking VOT2016 challenge results
Gündoğdu, Erhan; Alatan, Abdullah Aydın (2016-10-08)
The Visual Object Tracking challenge VOT2016 aims at comparing short-term single-object visual trackers that do not apply pre-learned models of object appearance. Results of 70 trackers are presented, with a large number of trackers being published at major computer vision conferences and journals in the recent years. The number of tested state-of-the-art trackers makes the VOT 2016 the largest and most challenging benchmark on short-term tracking to date. For each participating tracker, a short description...
A Flexible and Scalable Audio Information Retrieval System for Mixed-Type Audio Signals
Dogan, Ebru; SERT, MUSTAFA; Yazıcı, Adnan (Wiley, 2011-10-01)
The content-based classification and retrieval of real-world audio clips is one of the challenging tasks in multimedia information retrieval. Although the problem has been well studied in the last two decades, most of the current retrieval systems cannot provide flexible querying of audio clips due to the mixed-type form (e.g., speech over music and speech over environmental sound) of audio information in real world. We present here a complete, scalable, and extensible content-based classification and retri...
A self-protecting agents based model for high-performance mobile-cloud computing
Angın, Pelin; RANCHAL, Rohit (Elsevier BV, 2018-08-01)
Mobile-cloud computing (MCC) allows devices with resource and battery limitations to achieve computation-intensive tasks in real-time. While this new paradigm of computing seems beneficial for real-time mobile computing, existing MCC models mainly rely on keeping full clones of program code at remote sites and unstandardized/uninteroperable environments, hampering wider adoption. Moreover, the security risks arising from offloading data and code to an untrusted platform and the computational overhead introd...
On-demand conversation customization for services in large smart environments
Elgedawy, I. (IBM, 2011-01-01)
Services in large smart environments, as defined in this paper, are "aware" of their users' contexts and goals and are able to automatically interact with one another in order to achieve these goals. Unfortunately, interactions between services (i.e., service conversations) are not necessarily compatible, as services could have different interfaces (i.e., signature incompatibilities), as well as different logic for message ordering (i.e., protocol incompatibilities). Such conversation incompatibilities crea...
Citation Formats
M. Kristan et al., “The sixth visual object tracking VOT2018 challenge results,” 2019, Accessed: 00, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://hdl.handle.net/11511/62227.