Show/Hide Menu
Hide/Show Apps
anonymousUser
Logout
Türkçe
Türkçe
Search
Search
Login
Login
OpenMETU
OpenMETU
About
About
Open Science Policy
Open Science Policy
Communities & Collections
Communities & Collections
Help
Help
Frequently Asked Questions
Frequently Asked Questions
Videos
Videos
Thesis submission
Thesis submission
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission
Publication submission
Contact us
Contact us
Delta Analysis: A Hybrid Quantitative Approach for Measuring Discrepancies between Business Process Models
Date
2011-05-25
Author
Esgin, Eren
Karagöz, Pınar
Metadata
Show full item record
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License
.
Item Usage Stats
27
views
0
downloads
Cite This
Business process management (BPM) continues to play a significant role in today's highly globalized world. In order to detect and prevent the gap between reference process model and the actual operation, process mining techniques discover operational model on the basis of the process logs. An important issue at BPM is to measure the similarity between the reference process model and discovered process model so that it can be possible to pinpoint where process participants deviate from the intended process description. In this paper, a hybrid quantitative approach is presented to measure the similarity between the process models. The proposed similarity metric is based on a hybrid process mining technique that makes use of genetic algorithms. The proposed approach itself is also a hybrid model that considers process activity dependencies and process structure.
Subject Keywords
Similarity measurement
,
Process modeling
,
Process mining
,
Delta analysis
,
Business process management (BPM)
URI
https://hdl.handle.net/11511/62506
Collections
Department of Computer Engineering, Conference / Seminar
Citation Formats
IEEE
ACM
APA
CHICAGO
MLA
BibTeX
E. Esgin and P. Karagöz, “Delta Analysis: A Hybrid Quantitative Approach for Measuring Discrepancies between Business Process Models,” 2011, vol. 6678, p. 296, Accessed: 00, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://hdl.handle.net/11511/62506.