Show/Hide Menu
Hide/Show Apps
anonymousUser
Logout
Türkçe
Türkçe
Search
Search
Login
Login
OpenMETU
OpenMETU
About
About
Open Science Policy
Open Science Policy
Communities & Collections
Communities & Collections
Help
Help
Frequently Asked Questions
Frequently Asked Questions
Videos
Videos
Thesis submission
Thesis submission
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission
Publication submission
Contact us
Contact us
RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF THE TURKISH VERSION OF THE AUTOMATIC THOUGHTS QUESTIONNAIRE
Download
index.pdf
Date
1992-05-01
Author
SAHIN, NH
SAHIN, N
Metadata
Show full item record
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License
.
Item Usage Stats
5
views
19
downloads
Cite This
The present study investigated the reliability and validity of the ATQ in the Turkish cultural context. It is hoped that with this type of cross-cultural information, the universality of the proposed cognitive constructs can be advocated more reliably. The subjects were 345 university students; the split-half reliability of the ATQ was found to be r = .91 and Cronbach's alpha was .93; and item/total correlations ranged between .36 and .69. The Turkish ATQ correlated well with the BDI (r = .75), and it discriminated successfully between the symptomatic and asymptomatic groups. Factor analysis revealed five factors that were similar to those found in American samples. Nevertheless, some differences were noticed in the relative strength of the factors and in the distribution of items into factor clusters.
Subject Keywords
Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
,
Clinical Psychology
URI
https://hdl.handle.net/11511/65217
Journal
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4679(199205)48:3<334::aid-jclp2270480311>3.0.co;2-p
Collections
Department of Psychology, Article
Citation Formats
IEEE
ACM
APA
CHICAGO
MLA
BibTeX
N. SAHIN and N. SAHIN, “RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF THE TURKISH VERSION OF THE AUTOMATIC THOUGHTS QUESTIONNAIRE,”
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY
, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 334–340, 1992, Accessed: 00, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://hdl.handle.net/11511/65217.