Show/Hide Menu
Hide/Show Apps
Logout
Türkçe
Türkçe
Search
Search
Login
Login
OpenMETU
OpenMETU
About
About
Open Science Policy
Open Science Policy
Open Access Guideline
Open Access Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Communities & Collections
Communities & Collections
Help
Help
Frequently Asked Questions
Frequently Asked Questions
Guides
Guides
Thesis submission
Thesis submission
MS without thesis term project submission
MS without thesis term project submission
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission
Publication submission
Supporting Information
Supporting Information
General Information
General Information
Copyright, Embargo and License
Copyright, Embargo and License
Contact us
Contact us
Two-level comparisons of lexical features in academic writing between native and nonnative writers and across nonnative writers
Date
2018-03-12
Author
Yu, Xiaoli
Metadata
Show full item record
Item Usage Stats
223
views
0
downloads
Cite This
ased on Contrastive Interlanguage Analysis (CIA) framework, this ongoing corpus-based study analyzes the differences of lexical features in academic writings 1) between nonnative and native English writers and 2) across nonnative writers from various language backgrounds. The International Corpus of Learner English (ICLE) and the Louvain Corpus of Native Essay Writing (LOCNESS) are employed to represent nonnative and native writings respectively. Six mother tongue backgrounds are selected from the ICLE to reveal a broader picture of nonnative English writing. Both British and American native English speakers’ writing samples are selected to represent native speakers’ characteristics in writing. The corpus of each language group consists of 100 essays. Seven hundred essays (approximately 350,000 words) are included for the entire analyses. Lexical features analyzed in the study include lexical diversity, lexical sophistication, cohesion, and lexical networks. The MTLD value from Coh-Metrix is used to measure lexical diversity. Lexical Frequency Profiles (LFP) is used to evaluate the level of lexical sophistication. Constructs from Coh-Metrix are employed to assess the level of cohesion and lexical networks. T-tests and MANOVA tests are used to compare texts from different language groups.By focusing on the lexical features in native and nonnative speakers’ writings, the current study is significant for 1) better understanding the lexical characteristics of learner language in academic writing; 2) identifying the gaps between nonnative speakers and their native speaking peers in academic writing; 3) detecting the potential influences from L1s; 4) developing appropriate instructional strategies for academic writing according to learner needs.The results of the study are expected to obtain in December, 2017.
URI
https://hdl.handle.net/11511/75198
Collections
Unverified, Conference / Seminar
Suggestions
OpenMETU
Core
An investigation of the citation transformation types in MA and PhD theses
Dogan, Fatma Seyma; YAĞIZ, Oktay; Kaçar, Işıl Günseli (2018-11-03)
This study investigates the types of citation transformation preferred by both English L1 (native language) writers and Turkish writers who use English as a foreign language (L2). The corpus consists of 34 theses, 17 of which are Turkish writers' theses in English language including 10M.A. and 7 PhD theses and 17 English L1 writers' theses comprised of 10M.A. and 7 PhD theses. Based on the relevant literature, a rubric was prepared by the researchers in order to analyse the theses by means of qualitative co...
An examination of quantifier scope ambiguity in Turkish
Kurt, Kürşad; Bozşahin, Hüseyin Cem; Department of Cognitive Sciences (2006)
This study investigates the problem of quantifier scope ambiguity in natural languages and the various ways with which it has been accounted for, some of which are problematic for monotonic theories of grammar like Combinatory Categorial Grammar (CCG) which strive for solutions that avoid non-monotonic functional application, and assume complete transparency between the syntax and the semantics interface of a language. Another purpose of this thesis is to explore these proposals on examples from Turkish and...
An investigation of incidental vocabulary acquisition in relation to learner proficiency level and word frequency
Tekmen, E. Anne Ferrell; Daloğlu, Ayşegül (Wiley, 2006-06-01)
This study examined the relationship between learners' incidental vocabulary acquisition and their level of proficiency, and between acquisition and word frequency in a text. Participants were Turkish learners of English at three proficiency levels. One reading text and four vocabulary tests were administered over a two-week period. Analyses of the data revealed that lexical gains from reading were significant for each group (p < .05). The higher proficiency groups were able to acquire more words than lower...
Exploring the effects of feedback types and wiki on EFL learners’ writing performance
Altay, Ayşe; Seferoğlu, Gölge; Department of English Language Teaching (2018)
This thesis aims is to compare the impact of teacher- and peer-feedback on writing performances of ELT learners in wiki environment. It also investigates whether wiki has any role in writing development of the students. 67 Turkish learners of English as a foreign language took part in this study. This study employed both quantitative and qualitative methods, namely mixed methods research design. A pre-test and a post-test consisting of five different writing topics which were prepared to test the paragraph ...
An Experimental study on acquisition of prepositions in English as a third language
Çabuk, Sakine; Sağın Şimşek, Sultan Çiğdem; Gracanın Yüksek, Martına; Department of English Language Teaching (2016)
This study explores the role of cross-linguistic influence in third language acquisition process by examining English adpositions. Comprehension, processing and production of English prepositions (in, on, at, behind, over, to) were examined through off-line and on-line data collection tasks to find out which of the two known languages (L1 or L2) is the major source of cross-linguistic influence on the acquisition of English (L3) adpositions given the fact that adpositions are morphologically and syntactical...
Citation Formats
IEEE
ACM
APA
CHICAGO
MLA
BibTeX
X. Yu, “Two-level comparisons of lexical features in academic writing between native and nonnative writers and across nonnative writers,” 2018, Accessed: 00, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://hdl.handle.net/11511/75198.