Show/Hide Menu
Hide/Show Apps
Logout
Türkçe
Türkçe
Search
Search
Login
Login
OpenMETU
OpenMETU
About
About
Open Science Policy
Open Science Policy
Open Access Guideline
Open Access Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Communities & Collections
Communities & Collections
Help
Help
Frequently Asked Questions
Frequently Asked Questions
Guides
Guides
Thesis submission
Thesis submission
MS without thesis term project submission
MS without thesis term project submission
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission
Publication submission
Supporting Information
Supporting Information
General Information
General Information
Copyright, Embargo and License
Copyright, Embargo and License
Contact us
Contact us
Comparison of Various Spring Analogy Mesh Deformation Techniques in 2 D Airfoil Design Optimization
Date
2015-06-29
Author
Yang, Yosheph
Özgen, Serkan
Metadata
Show full item record
Item Usage Stats
193
views
0
downloads
Cite This
During the last few decades, CFD (Computational Fluid Dynamics) has developed greatly and has become a more reliable tool for the conceptual phase of aircraft design. This tool is generally combined with an optimization algorithm. In the optimization phase, the need for regenerating the computational mesh might become cumbersome, especially when the number of design parameters is high. For this reason, several mesh generation and deformation techniques have been developed in the past decades. One of the most widely used techniques is the Spring Analogy. There are numerous spring analogy related techniques reported in the literature: linear spring analogy, torsional spring analogy, semitorsional spring analogy, and ball vertex spring analogy. This paper gives the explanation of linear spring analogy method and angle inclusion in the spring analogy method. In the latter case, two di¨erent solution methods are proposed. The best feasible method will later be used for two-dimensional (2D) Airfoil Design Optimization with objective function being to minimize sectional drag for a required lift coe©cient at di¨erent speeds. Design variables used in the optimization include camber and thickness distribution of the airfoil. SU2 CFD is chosen as the §ow solver during the optimization procedure. The optimization is done by using Phoenix ModelCenter Optimization Tool.
URI
https://hdl.handle.net/11511/78564
Relation
Progress in Flight Physics, 2017
Collections
Department of Aerospace Engineering, Book / Book chapter
Suggestions
OpenMETU
Core
Multi-fidelity aerodynamic dataset generation of a fighter aircraft
Kurt, Huseyin Burak; Millidere, Murat; Gomec, Fazıl Selcuk; Uğur, Ömür (2021-01-01)
High-fidelity aerodynamic dataset generation is one of the most significant components of the aircraft flight simulation, and, it is a time consuming and costly process. Data fusion techniques suggest that, instead of using high fidelity data for entire aerodynamic dataset, an incorporating combination of high-fidelity and low-fidelity data is a more cost-effective one. The objective of data fusion is to obtain high-fidelity dataset accuracy by combining less amount of high-fidelity dataset and more amount ...
Application of numerical shape optimization to the runner blades of a francis turbine
Yalılı, Mehmet; Aksel, Mehmet Haluk; Department of Mechanical Engineering (2015)
The multi-objective design of hydraulic turbines using computational fluid dynamics software has been an important subject in turbomachinery area recently. Researches focus especially on obtaining higher turbine efficiency by the improvement of runner shapes. Thus in the present study, a multi-objective shape optimization procedure was applied to improve the runner blade shapes of a small Francis turbine named as GAMM turbine which was selected from the literature. CFD computations as well as blade generati...
Implementation and assessment of k-omega-gamma transition model for turbulent flows
Karabay, Sami; Baran, Özgür Uğraş; Department of Mechanical Engineering (2022-5-09)
The transition from laminar flow to turbulence is challenging to model in CFD. Due to the complex nature of transition, it is neglected in CFD codes usually by assuming the flow is fully turbulent. However, this results in missing the fundamental characteristics of the flow and inaccurate predictions of the flow field. Although there are several transition models, most of them cannot be used in CFD simulations due to practical issues or low accuracy. Yet, some of these models are promising and candidates to...
Implementation and comparison of turbulence models on a flat plate problem using a Navier-Stokes solver
Genç, Balkan Ziya; Aksel, Mehmet Haluk; Department of Mechanical Engineering (2003)
For turbulent flow calculations, some of the well-known turbulence models in the literature are applied on a previously developed Navier-Stokes solver designed to handle laminar flows. A finite volume formulation, which is cell-based for inviscid terms and cell-vertex for viscous terms, is used for numerical discretization of the Navier-Stokes equations in conservative form. This formulation is combined with one-step, explicit time marching Lax-Wendroff numerical scheme that is second order accurate in spac...
Numerical investigations of lateral jets for missile aerodynamics
Ağsarlıoğlu, Ekin; Albayrak, Kahraman; Department of Mechanical Engineering (2011)
In this thesis, effects of sonic lateral jets on aerodynamics of missiles and missilelike geometries are investigated numerically by commercial Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) software FLUENT. The study consists of two parts. In the first part, two generic missile-like geometries with lateral jets, of which experimental data are available in literature, are analyzed by the software for validation studies. As the result of this study, experimental data and CFD results are in good agreement with each other...
Citation Formats
IEEE
ACM
APA
CHICAGO
MLA
BibTeX
Y. Yang and S. Özgen,
Comparison of Various Spring Analogy Mesh Deformation Techniques in 2 D Airfoil Design Optimization
. 2015, p. 352.