The Agency Cost of Investıng in Ethical Funds

Date

2020-9-01

Author

Ayaydın Hacıömeroğlu, Hande
Danışoğlu, Seza
Güner, Zehra Nuray

Metadata

Show full item record

Item Usage Stats

306
views

0
downloads

With the increased popularity of ethical funds, many studies have asked the question “Does it pay to be good?” (Barnett and Salomon, 2012)[1] and compared such investments with conventional alternatives in terms of return performance. Ethical funds have an investment mandate for either positively screening stocks that meet a threshold level of environmental, social and governance (ESG) performance, or, negatively screening stocks by avoiding any that are issued by companies operating in the so-called sin industries. Investors in ethical funds have either purely social objectives or a blended objective of generating social and financial returns simultaneously. A lesser discussed issue is whether the portfolios formed by fund managers indeed adhere to the “ethical standards” that the fund’s investors have in mind when they first choose the fund. From a finance perspective, the relationship between fund managers and investors can be viewed as an agency relationship[2] since the manager’s job is to form a portfolio that includes only those investments that satisfy the ethical and social criteria that the fund investors would impose on a portfolio of their own. This paper proposes an adjustment to the widely used Sharpe methodology (2002)[3] for examining an ethical fund manager’s “asset allocation” versus “active management” abilities. The sample includes European and US open-end ethical mutual funds for the period between 2004 and 2019. The methodology will make it possible to assess the extent to which fund managers use social and ethical criteria in their asset allocation decisions. It will also reveal whether ethical fund investors bear an agency cost in their investments. [1] Barnett, M.L. and Salomon, R.M., 2012. Does it pay to be really good? Addressing the shape of the relationship between social and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 33(11), pp.1304-1320. [2] Allen, F., 2001. Do financial institutions matter?. The Journal of Finance, 56(4), pp.1165-1175. [3] Sharpe, W.F., 1992. Asset allocation: Management style and performance measurement. Journal of Portfolio Management, 18(2), pp.7-19.

URI

https://hdl.handle.net/11511/78598

Collections

Department of Business Administration, Article

Suggestions

OpenMETU
Core

The agency cost of investing in ethical funds: A style analysis approach Ayaydın Hacıömeroğlu, Hande; Danışoğlu, Seza; Güner, Zehra Nuray; Cem Şahin, Baki (2022-01-01) This study aims to determine whether ethical funds make portfolio choices in line with their investment mandates. Our results show that during the first half of the sample period, it is much more difficult to distinguish the investment styles of ethical and conventional funds. The potential for ethical fund investors to face agency conflicts from investing in portfolios that are not necessarily in line with their preferences based on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) criteria is higher in the earl...
The characteristics of financial innovation in developing countries : the case of Turkey Kılıçaslan, Seda; Cömert, Hasan; Department of Science and Technology Policy Studies (2019) Financial innovations are one of the important factors affecting the development of financial markets and have attracted more attention in the literature especially after the 1980s. In the existing literature, only a few studies investigate financial innovation processes in developing countries. The main purpose of this study is to investigate the factors influencing the emergence and development processes of financial innovations in Turkey. Thus, it is aimed to fill the gap in the development process of fi...
The intraday lead-lag relationship of spot and futures markets in Turkey : co-integration and causality analyses Abuk, Neşe; Danışoğlu, Seza; Department of Financial Mathematics (2011) This study is concerned with the lead-lag relationship between Turkish spot equity and derivatives markets. In the study, the spot equity market is represented by the ISE-30 Index. In order to compare the structure of the two markets, the futures contract written on the ISE-30 Index, namely TURKDEX-ISE 30, is chosen to represent the derivatives market. The analysis is performed over the sample period beginning February 4, 2005 and ending on December 10, 2010 which actually covers the entire time span from t...
The effect of focus versus diversification On bank performance: does ethical structure matter? Çalı, Gizem; Danışoğlu, Seza; Department of Financial Mathematics (2021-12-27) Financial institutions pursue a tradeoff model in order to reduce risk and maximize profitability and performance. Ethical practices, like those of any other profit-maximizing firm, must pursue profit. For banks that target sustainable practices, what matters is how they generate profits and whether their practices have harmful social or environmental consequences. The aim of this thesis is to investigate the impact of asset and liability diversification on bank performance by taking into consideration the ...
The Effect of Margin Changes on Futures Market Volume and Trading Danışoğlu, Seza (null; 2017-01-08) Margins are performance bonds that are designed to protect market participants and the market as a whole against investor default. Academic interest in analyzing margins started in the late 1960s and the number of studies increased parallel to the growth of the derivatives markets. Studies on margins mostly focus on the margin regulations, impact of margin levels on trading activity and optimal margin rules. The aim of this study is to determine the impact of margin levels and margin changes on trading acti...

Citation Formats

H. Ayaydın Hacıömeroğlu, S. Danışoğlu, and Z. N. Güner, “The Agency Cost of Investıng in Ethical Funds,” 2020, Accessed: 00, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://hdl.handle.net/11511/78598.