Simulation of water quality during unsteady flow in the Chicago Waterway System

2004-01-01
Melchıng, Charles
Alp, Emre
Sherasta, Ram
Lanyon, Rıchard
The Chicago Waterway System (CWS) is composed of the Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal (CSSC), Calumet-Sag Channel, North Shore Channel, lower portion of the North Branch Chicago River, South Branch Chicago River, Chicago River, and Little Calumet River. In total, the CWS is a 76.3 mi (122.8-km) branching network of navigable waterways controlled by hydraulic structures in which the majority of flow is treated sewage effluent. The Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago (MWRDGC) will soon be faced with a number of difficult water-quality management issues including the impact of reduced discretionary diversions from Lake Michigan for water-quality improvement in the summer, the outcome of a use attainability analysis for the CWS, and development of total maximum daily load allocations. To evaluate these management issues and their impact on water quality in the CWS, a model capable of simulating water-quality processes under unsteady-state flow is being developed to assist in water-quality management and planning decision making. The DUFLOW model developed in The Netherlands was selected for simulation of the CWS. The model hydraulics were calibrated using hourly stage data at three gages and verified at five gages operated by the MWRDGC within the CWS and at the downstream boundary at Romeoville. The water-quality model was calibrated using monthly grab sample data at 21 locations and hourly dissolved oxygen (DO) data at 27 locations all collected by the MWRDGC. The model was run at a 15- min. time step for the period of April 1 to May 4, 2002. The stage simulation agreed with the measured data nearly always within two percent relative to the flow depth. The simulated DO values agreed well with the observed values. The model then was applied to evaluate the effect of a proposed change in CWS navigational rules on the water quality in the CWS. Allowing lower water levels in the CWS immediately after storms that were improperly forecast could reduce the amount of water diverted from Lake Michigan. The reduced diversion was found to have a maximum average impact on DO of ?2 mg/L on the South Branch of the Chicago River near the main Lake Michigan Diversion point, this was reduced to an average impact on DO of ?0.4 mg/L on the downstream reaches of the CSSC. The effects on the North Branch Chicago River and Calumet-Sag Channel were far smaller.
Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation 2004

Suggestions

Modeling evaluation of integrated strategies to meet proposed dissolved oxygen standards for the Chicago waterway system
Melching, Charles S.; Ao, Yaping; Alp, Emre (2013-02-15)
The Chicago Waterway System (CWS) is a 113.8 km branching network of navigable waterways controlled by hydraulic structures in which the majority of flow is treated sewage effluent and there are periods of substantial combined sewer overflow. The Illinois Pollution Control Board (IPCB) designated the majority of the CWS as Secondary Contact and Indigenous Aquatic Life Use waters in the 1970s and made small alterations to these designations in 1988. Between 1988 and 2002 substantial improvements in the pollu...
Allocation of supplementary aeration stations in the Chicago waterway system for dissolved oxygen improvement
Alp, Emre (2011-06-01)
The Chicago Waterway System (CWS), used mainly for commercial and recreational navigation and for urban drainage, is a 122.8 km branching network of navigable waterways controlled by hydraulic structures. The CWS receives pollutant loads from 3 of the largest wastewater treatment plants in the world, nearly 240 gravity Combined Sewer Overflows (CSO), 3 CSO pumping stations, direct diversions from Lake Michigan, and eleven tributary streams or drainage areas. Even though treatment plant effluent concentratio...
Field testing and evaluation of the Ironton-Russell truss bridge
Lenett, Michael; Hunt, Victor; Helmicki, Arthur; Türer, Ahmet (2004-12-01)
The Ironton-Russell truss bridge spanning the Ohio River between the cities of Ironton, Ohio and Russell, Kentucky was opened to traffic in April 1922. Although this bridge spans the Ohio River between Ohio and Kentucky, it is owned and operated by the state of Ohio and is considered a landmark by both the residents of Ironton and Russell. The main spans of this truss consist of a 3-span cantilever through truss, with a suspended truss in the center span, and a simple span through truss. Visual inspections ...
Evaluation of the alternatives to improve water quality in Gürdük watershed using swat model.
Kabal, Cevdet; Alp, Emre; Department of Environmental Engineering (2019)
Gürdük Watershed is a part of Gediz Watershed and it is located is in Aegean Region. The Watershed covers an area of approximately 3,200 km2. Within the boundaries of Gürdük Watershed, there are 10 districts of Manisa. Since Gürdük Watershed has fertile soil and a suitable climate for agriculture, the region is at the forefront of agricultural production in Turkey. More than 50 % of the watershed consists of areas with agricultural lands. Within of the scope of this thesis, the current pollution status of t...
Evaluation of heavy metal contents, polyaromatic petroleum hydrocarbons and some inorganic pollutants in the south Marmara rivers, Turkey
Yılmaz, Ayşen; Yemenicioglu, S; Aksoy, S; Torunoglu, T (1998-05-01)
Nilufer River is the main receiving body of water for the industrial and domestic wastes of 1.000.000 populated Bursa metropolitan area and it combines with Kocasu River before entering the sea at the south Marmara region, Turkey. Variations in concentrations of Na, K, Ca, Mg, Fe, Cl, SO4, PO4, NH4, NO3, NO2, BOD5, COD, polyaromatic petroleum hydrocarbons (PAH), pH and some heavy metals (Hg, Cd, Cr, Zn, Pb) were seasonally determined in 1991-94 period. The results showed that these rivers are included in th...
Citation Formats
C. Melchıng, E. Alp, R. Sherasta, and R. Lanyon, “Simulation of water quality during unsteady flow in the Chicago Waterway System,” 2004, p. 1077, Accessed: 00, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://hdl.handle.net/11511/87730.