An application of exclusion theory to world politics: core-periphery relations in Middle East history

Download

12626014.pdf

Date

2021-1-4

Author

Oğultarhan, Adem

Metadata

Show full item record

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Item Usage Stats

521
views

350
downloads

The central claim of the thesis is that when world political relations are assessed from a systems perspective, the main template of relations can be established along core-periphery dichotomy, instead of a state-centric approach. From this perspective, the underlying relationship in world politics is the one between the core and the periphery and this relationship is characterized by the dynamics of exclusion vs. inclusion. Exclusion and inclusion concepts are derived from Niklas Luhmann’s system theory, and based on these concepts a new model has been offered. Then, this model has been applied to the history of the Middle East from ancient Mesopotamia to the Ottoman-Safavid period. The reason why this region and this period is chosen is that they are understudied in the discipline of IR. Second, it is this region and period where for the first time the regional political relations became observable in history. The findings that are achieved by studying the political relations of the region are mostly in compliance with the predictions of the theoretical model we developed. The findings are: (1) It is more appropriate to read the world politics from a lens of core-periphery dichotomy rather than a state-centric perspective. (2) The underlying relationship between the core and the periphery is exclusion. (3) Peripheral areas seek inclusion in their relations with the core. (4) Core areas are not opponents of each other, rather they cooperate with each other. (5) Peripheral areas do not show a cohesion.

Subject Keywords

International Relations of the Middle East, the Exclusion Theory, Niklas Luhmann, Systems Theory and International Relations, International System

URI

https://hdl.handle.net/11511/89904

Collections

Graduate School of Social Sciences, Thesis

Suggestions

OpenMETU
Core

"Small States" in International Relations: Development, Definition, Foreign Policy and Alliance Behavior Tür Küçükkaya, Özlem (Uluslararasi Iliskiler Dergisi, 2017-01-01) The aim of this article is to analyze the concept of small states in the discipline of International Relations to show differences and contradictions in the definition and to discuss the literature on foreign policy and alliance behavior of small states. The article emphasizes that there has not been a single approach to the definition of small states and there is diversity in the studies dealing with foreign policy and alliance behavior of these states. While the article enables us to question to what exte...
The evolution of central Eurasia policy of the US in the post-Soviet era and the geopolitics of the Caspian oil Değer, Deniz; Altunışık, Meliha; Department of International Relations (2006) The objective of this thesis is to analyze the US Central Eurasia Policy in the period between 1991 and 2006. Within this context, the purpose is to figure out the foremost motive behind the US’s strategic engagement in the region with a due regard to changing geopolitical context with the demise of the Soviet Union. The main argument rests upon the assumption that the US regional policy is primarily motivated by geopolitical imperatives as the Central Eurasian region becomes the primary springboard for the...
European neighbourhood policy, as a hegemonic project: the case of Ukraine Özdilek, Sibel Elif; Türkeş, Mustafa; Department of International Relations (2009) This thesis attempts to analyze the European Neighbourhood Policy from a Neo-Gramscian perspective, mapping transnational power relations in Europe and identifying the historical-specific articulations between economic, political and (civil) societal processes in the specific case of Ukraine. Thus the thesis attempts to show how the EU’s hegemonic project is formed and applied, it also explores whether there are redefinitions of the EU hegemonic project and ask whether it is sustainable or not. It is conten...
A Historical Materialist Analysis of Turkish Foreign Policy: Class, State, and Hegemony Yalvaç, Faruk (Uluslararasi Iliskiler Dergisi, 2016-01-01) This article aims to develop a historical materialist analysis to analyse Turkish Foreign Policy (TFP) as part of what I refer to as critical foreign policy studies. The paper utilises a critical political economy approach to TFP based on the Gramscian concept of hegemony and extends it to analyse different foreign policy strategies as hegemonic projects developed by ruling capital classes to sustain their rule. The paper also presents the concept of hegemonic depth to resolve the antinomies involved in und...
Empowering Critical International Theory by Applying Action Research Methodology to its Inquiry Kurtbağ, Ömer (Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi (Ankara, Turkey), 2011-4) This paper analyzes the influence and relevance of Gramscian and Habermasian critical international theories within the context of recent developments in the world politics that do not function in favour of these discourses’ emancipatory objectives and projections. It first looks at their emergence as alternative paradigms to the traditional conceptualizations in the discipline of IR and then compares the roots of their theoretical positions and their contribution to the analysis of international politics. ...

Citation Formats

A. Oğultarhan, “An application of exclusion theory to world politics: core-periphery relations in Middle East history,” Ph.D. - Doctoral Program, Middle East Technical University, 2021.