Teacher feedback and student feedback on writing tasks: A comparative study

Kırsaç, Elif
Yılmazel, Gizem
This research aims to investigate if peer feedback is any different from teacher feedback. The study was conducted in a non-profit foundation university with 40 A1 level preparatory school students. Students were given a writing task and afterward, they were asked to give feedback on their peers’ papers by using error codes provided by the teacher. At the same time, teachers gave feedback to the same papers by using the same error correction codes. Data were collected by means of a writing task which was supported by written feedback from students and analyzed through a comparative approach. By the end of these sessions, the focus of students and teachers were investigated to find out if they gave importance to the same issues. The results revealed that teachers used more correction codes than the learners and students mostly corrected surface level mistakes and this includes codes regarding language use.
Journal of Teaching and Education


Teacher cognition on written feedback: Novice and experienced teachers’ beliefs, attitudes and practices
Karaağaç, , Gül; Yiğitoğlu, Nur; Department of English Language Teaching (2014-7)
Written feedback has in recent years attracted the attention of an increasing number of researchers. While much research on written feedback has focused on students’ and/or teachers’ preferences of written feedback (e.g. Zhu, 2010), teacher beliefs and practices regarding written feedback (e.g. Clements, 2006; Min, 2011), very few, if any, explored the influence of teachers’ experience on feedback practices. In an attempt to address this gap in literature, this study investigates the impact of experience on...
Effects of Combined Peer-Teacher Feedback on Second Language Writing Development
Demirel, Elif; Enginarlar, Hüsnü (2016-10-01)
This study attempts to test the effectiveness of a feedback model which combines teacher and peer feedback systematically on improving students' writing ability in the context of a multiple draft writing course. 57 Turkish EFL students participated in the study which lasted for a 15-week semester. The experimental and control groups were provided different feedback treatments and then statistically compared in terms of the revisions they made in their essay drafts and their writing improvement. A total of 1...
The Effectiveness of EFL students’ peer feedback practices in composition classes: a case study at a state university in Turkey
Demir, Sinem; Eröz Tuğa, Betil; Department of English Language Teaching (2019)
Conducted in the preparatory school of a state university in central Turkey, this thesis study aimed to investigate the extent to which EFL students incorporate peer feedback into their essay revisions, to explore EFL students’ and EFL instructors’ views on the effectiveness of the peer feedback practices and also their suggestions for improving these practices. The study was carried out with 109 participants, including 100 EFL students and 9 EFL instructors in the second term in 2018-2019 academic year. Th...
An ınvestigation of a complementary feedback model for l2 writing: peer and teacher feedback versus teacher feedback
Tokdemir Demirel, Elif; Enginarlar, Hüsnü; Department of English Language Teaching (2009)
This study aimed at developing a complementary peer-teacher feedback model, in which students and teachers share the responsibility of providing feedback in a systematic way and testing its effectiveness. The effectiveness of the developed feedback model on improving students’ writing ability was tested in the context of a multiple draft writing course which followed a process approach with 57 preparatory class students at Karadeniz Technical University, Department of English Language and Literature for a p...
Generating actionable predictions regarding MOOC learners' engagement in peer reviews
Gomez-Sanchez, Eduardo; Er, Erkan; Bote-Lorenzo, Miguel L.; Dimitriadis, Yannis; Asensio-Perez, Juan I. (2020-12-01)
Peer review is one approach to facilitate formative feedback exchange in MOOCs; however, it is often undermined by low participation. To support effective implementation of peer reviews in MOOCs, this research work proposes several predictive models to accurately classify learners according to their expected engagement levels in an upcoming peer-review activity, which offers various pedagogical utilities (e.g. improving peer reviews and collaborative learning activities). Two approaches were used for traini...
Citation Formats
E. Kırsaç and G. Yılmazel, “Teacher feedback and student feedback on writing tasks: A comparative study,” Journal of Teaching and Education, pp. 0–0, 2021, Accessed: 00, 2021. [Online]. Available: http://www.universitypublications.net/jte/0901/pdf/P9G85.pdf.