On the ontology of linguistic frameworks toward a comprehensive version of empiricism

Download

index.pdf

Date

2015-01-01

Author

Davoody Benı, Majıd

Metadata

Show full item record

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Item Usage Stats

173
views

98
downloads

Can the abstract entities be designated ? While the empiricists usually took the positive answer to this question as the first step toward Platonism, in his "Empiricism, Semantics, and Ontology" [Carnap 1950], Carnap tried to make a reconciliation between the language referring to abstract entities on the one hand, and empiricism on the other. In this paper, firstly, I show that the ingenuity of Carnap's approach notwithstanding, it is prone to criticism from different aspects. But I also show how, even without leaving the empiricist research program, the shortcomings could be amended. Following Carnap's 1950 outset, and adding some apparently untasteful (Meinongian) ingredients, I will sketch a refined way for dealing with the problem of existence of abstract entities within the framework of the philosophy of empiricism.

URI

https://hdl.handle.net/11511/95002

Journal

Philosophia Scientiae

DOI

https://doi.org/10.4000/philosophiascientiae.1044

Collections

Department of Philosophy, Article

Suggestions

OpenMETU
Core

A new theory of content Aytekin, Tevfik; Sayan, Erdinç; Department of Philosophy (2003) Naturalistic philosophers of meaning try to define the recalcitrant concept of reference in terms respected by the empirical science, such as causality or teleology. In this thesis, after a brief introduction to these trials is given, Fodors theory of content in terms of asymmetric dependence is examined in some depth. I claim that although this theory involves an important insight, it is an unsatisfactory attempt at reduction of the notion of reference. I develop a new theory of content, which does not hav...
A Study of argumentation in Turkish within a Bayesian reasoning framework : arguments from ignorance Karaaslan, Hatice; Hohenberger, Annette Edeltraud; Demir, Mehmet Hilmi; Department of Cognitive Sciences (2012) In this dissertation, a normative prescriptive paradigm, namely a Bayesian theory of content-dependent argument strength, was employed in order to investigate argumentation, specifically the classic fallacy of the “argument from ignorance” or “argumentum ad ignorantiam”. The study was carried out in Turkish with Turkish participants. In the Bayesian framework, argument strength is determined by the interactions between three major factors: prior belief, polarity, and evidence reliability. In addition, topic...
A Critical analysis of Kant’s discursivity principle Okar, Sinan; Çırakman, Elif; Department of Philosophy (2019) This thesis takes issue with the charge leveled against Kant, that the discursivity principle, which states knowledge of objects requires intuitions as well as concepts, remains unargued for in Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason, and therefore is an ungrounded presupposition underlying Kant’s Transcendental Idealism. I argue that Kant in the Introduction to the Critique Kant provides sufficient tools from which an argument for this principle can be reconstructed. Kant’s critique of metaphysics is taken as the f...
On the construction of the phase space of a singular system Baleanu, D; Guler, Y (2000-03-01) In this work we present a method for obtaining the true degrees of freedom for the singular systems using the canonical transformations in the Hamilton-Jacobi formalism. The validity of our proposal has been tested by two examples of singular Lagrangians and the results are in agreement with those obtained by other methods.
A DEFENSE OF MEANING ELIMINATIVISM: A CONNECTIONIST APPROACH Toy, Tolgahan; Grünberg, David; Department of Philosophy (2022-3) The standard approach to model how human beings understand natural languages is the symbolic, compositional approach according to which the meaning of a complex expression is a function of the meanings of its constituents. In other words, meaning plays a fundamental role in the model. In this work, because of the polysemous, flexible, dynamic, and contextual structure of natural languages, this approach is rejected. Instead, a connectionist model which eliminates the concept of meaning is proposed.

Citation Formats

M. Davoody Benı, “On the ontology of linguistic frameworks toward a comprehensive version of empiricism,” Philosophia Scientiae, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 115–126, 2015, Accessed: 00, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://hdl.handle.net/11511/95002.