Show/Hide Menu
Hide/Show Apps
Logout
Türkçe
Türkçe
Search
Search
Login
Login
OpenMETU
OpenMETU
About
About
Open Science Policy
Open Science Policy
Open Access Guideline
Open Access Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Communities & Collections
Communities & Collections
Help
Help
Frequently Asked Questions
Frequently Asked Questions
Guides
Guides
Thesis submission
Thesis submission
MS without thesis term project submission
MS without thesis term project submission
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission
Publication submission
Supporting Information
Supporting Information
General Information
General Information
Copyright, Embargo and License
Copyright, Embargo and License
Contact us
Contact us
One (Financial Well-Being) Model Fits All? Testing the Multidimensional Subjective Financial Well-Being Scale Across Nine Countries
Download
s10902-024-00708-z.pdf
Date
2024-02-01
Author
Sorgente, Angela
Atay, Bünyamin
Aubrey, Marc
Bhatia, Shikha
Crespo, Carla
Fonseca, Gabriela
Güneri, Oya
Lep, Žan
Lessard, David
Negru-Subtirica, Oana
Portugal, Alda
Ranta, Mette
Relvas, Ana Paula
Singh, Nidhi
Sirsch, Ulrike
Zupančič, Maja
Lanz, Margherita
Metadata
Show full item record
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License
.
Item Usage Stats
99
views
31
downloads
Cite This
A multidimensional model of emerging adults’ subjective financial well-being was proposed (Sorgente and Lanz, Int Journal of Behavioral Development, 43(5), 466–478 2019). The authors also developed a 5-factor scale (the Multidimensional Subjective Financial Well-being Scale, MSFWBS) intending to measure this construct in the European context. To date, data using this instrument have been collected in nine countries: Austria, Canada, Finland, India, Italy, Portugal, Romania, Slovenia, and Turkey. In the current study, data from these countries were analysed to test the validity of this model internationally. In particular, using an international sample of 4,475 emerging adults, we collected the following kinds of validity evidence for the MSFWBS: score structure, reliability, generalizability, convergent, and criterion-related evidence. Findings suggest that the MSFWBS (1) yields valid and reliable scores, and (2) works well in individualistic and economically developed countries, producing comparable scores. Implications for researchers and practitioners are discussed.
Subject Keywords
Approximate measurement invariance
,
Cross-national
,
Emerging adulthood
,
Subjective financial well-being
,
Validation
URI
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85183714792&origin=inward
https://hdl.handle.net/11511/108615
Journal
Journal of Happiness Studies
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-024-00708-z
Collections
Graduate School of Social Sciences, Article
Citation Formats
IEEE
ACM
APA
CHICAGO
MLA
BibTeX
A. Sorgente et al., “One (Financial Well-Being) Model Fits All? Testing the Multidimensional Subjective Financial Well-Being Scale Across Nine Countries,”
Journal of Happiness Studies
, vol. 25, no. 1-2, pp. 0–0, 2024, Accessed: 00, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85183714792&origin=inward.