Locating Susurluk affair into the context of legal-political theory : a case of extra-legal activities of the modern states

Download

index.pdf

Date

2004

Author

Sabuktay, Ayşegül

Metadata

Show full item record

Item Usage Stats

144
views

119
downloads

The study locates Susurluk Affair into the legal-political theory, around an axis passing through two standpoints that defines the state either as a legal or as a political institution. Two words, أSusurluk Affairؤ refer to an accumulation of incidents and relationships that point to extra-legal activities of the state that are revealed by a traffic accident in Turkey. Susurluk Affair and similar cases of extra-legal activities of the state are frequent in modern political life, although the modern state is founded on the presumption of legal use of public authority. Susurluk Affair is discussed with reference to Max Weber̕s and Jürgen Habermas̕s theories of the rule of law, and Hans Kelsen̕s legal positivism, both of which provide perspectives that define the state as a legal institution, and from the viewpoints of doctrine of raison d̕etat and Carl Schmitt̕s theories of the political and sovereignty that conceptualize the state as a political institution. Susurluk Affair can be interpreted in accordance with Weber̕s, Habermas̕s and Kelsen̕s theoretical standpoints either as a deficiency in legitimacy or violations by certain persons, however it can be interpreted as activities for maintaining the state in the framework of the doctrine of raison d̕etat. On the other hand, the Schmittian approach acknowledges extra-legal activities of the state, but Susurluk Affair cannot be interpreted as a case of deciding the exception in the Schmittian sense.

Subject Keywords

Political science., Theory of the State.

URI

http://etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/3/12605186/index.pdf
https://hdl.handle.net/11511/14365

Collections

Graduate School of Social Sciences, Thesis

Suggestions

OpenMETU
Core

Understanding populist politics in Turkey: a hegemonic depth approach Yalvaç, Faruk (Cambridge University Press (CUP), 2019-12-01) The aim of this article is to understand populism as a hegemonic project involving a struggle for power between different social forces. We take a critical realist approach in defining populism. This implies several things. We develop a new approach to understanding populist politics by taking neither a purely discursive (Laclau), nor a solely structural (Poulantzas), but a critical realist approach and analysing the three-way relationship between structural conditions, agency, and institutional framework. ...
Debates on civil society: from centre-periphery to radical civil societarianism Duruşan, Fırat; Ayata, Ayşe; Department of Political Science and Public Administration (2008) The radical democratic conception of civil society strives for theoretically constructing and politically defending civil society as a social sphere autonomous from both the economy and state. As a position taken against Marxist and liberal theories, radical civil societarianism views the cultural and normative structures of modern societies as independent from and prior to systemically conceived economic and political relations. These structures is purported to give way to spontaneous social solidarity cha...
Civil society debate in Turkey: a critical analysis Onbaşı, Funda; Özçoban Üstüner, Fahriye; Department of Political Science and Public Administration (2008) This thesis analyzes the debate revolving around the concept of civil society in Turkey with reference to academic literature. It argues that despite the seeming variety of approaches to the concept of civil society, there is an underlying commonality among the widespread usages of the concept. These seemingly different approaches in the end become the versions of the same hegemonic view. This, in turn, causes a vicious circle in the civil society debate in Turkey. The basis upon which this hegemonic view i...
The issue of undecidability within the debate between Ernesto Laclau and Slavoj Žižek Uzuner, Mehmet Gökhan; Okyayuz, Mehmet; Department of Political Science and Public Administration (2009) The philosophical problem of the tension between liberty and order has dominated the agenda of western philosophy and science since the beginning of the history of thought, and it is a leading issue nowadays, too. The problem of the act of decision is particularly one of the significant themes of contemporary political thought. Instead of the classical poles of both voluntarism and determinism prioritising either the subject or the structure, what should be employed is a much deeper analysis of the relation...
LEVEL OF ANALYSIS AND UNIT OF ANALYSIS - A CASE FOR DISTINCTION Yurdusev, Ahmet Nuri (SAGE Publications, 1993-03-01) This paper takes the view that the 'level of analysis' problem, first posed by Singer (1961), has not been discussed to the extent that it deserves in the literature of International Relations. The concepts of the 'level of analysis' and the 'unit of analysis' have widely been used interchangeably. The author attempts to make a distinction between the 'level of analysis' and the 'unit of analysis', arguing that the 'level of analysis' is an issue of how to study (methodology and context) and the 'unit of ...

Citation Formats

A. Sabuktay, “Locating Susurluk affair into the context of legal-political theory : a case of extra-legal activities of the modern states,” Ph.D. - Doctoral Program, Middle East Technical University, 2004.