Show/Hide Menu
Hide/Show Apps
Logout
Türkçe
Türkçe
Search
Search
Login
Login
OpenMETU
OpenMETU
About
About
Open Science Policy
Open Science Policy
Open Access Guideline
Open Access Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Communities & Collections
Communities & Collections
Help
Help
Frequently Asked Questions
Frequently Asked Questions
Guides
Guides
Thesis submission
Thesis submission
MS without thesis term project submission
MS without thesis term project submission
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission
Publication submission
Supporting Information
Supporting Information
General Information
General Information
Copyright, Embargo and License
Copyright, Embargo and License
Contact us
Contact us
A comperative assessment of available methods for seismic performance evaluation of buried structures
Download
index.pdf
Date
2009
Author
Özcebe, Ali Güney
Metadata
Show full item record
Item Usage Stats
305
views
123
downloads
Cite This
In the last three decades, seismic performance assessment of buried structures has evolved through the following stages : i) buried structures are not prone to seismically-induced damages, thus no need for detailed investigations, ii) eliminating soil-structure-earthquake interaction and use of seismically-induced free field ground deformations directly as the basis for seismic demand, thus producing conservative results, and finally iii) soil-structure and earthquake interaction models incorporating both kinematic and inertial interactions. As part of soil-structure and earthquake interacting models, simplified frame analysis established the state of practice and is widely used. Within the confines of this thesis, the results of simplified frame analysis based response of buried structures are compared with those of 2-D finite element dynamic analyses. For the purpose, 1-D dynamic and 2-D pseudo-dynamic analyses of free field and buried structural systems are performed for a number of generic soil, structure and earthquake combinations. The analyses results revealed that, in general, available closed form solutions are in pretty good agreement with the results of finite element analyses. However, due to the fact that dynamic analyses can model both kinematic and inertial effects; it should be preffered for the design of critical structures.
Subject Keywords
Civil engineering.
URI
http://etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12610857/index.pdf
https://hdl.handle.net/11511/18736
Collections
Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Thesis
Suggestions
OpenMETU
Core
An investigation of the inertial interaction of building structures on shallow foundations with simplified soil-structure interaction analysis methods
Eyce, Bora; Bakır, Bahadır Sadık; Department of Civil Engineering (2009)
Seismic response of a structure is influenced by the inertial interaction between structure and deformable medium, on which the structure rests, due to flexibility and energy dissipation capability of the surrounding soil. The inertial interaction analyses can be performed by utilizing simplified soil-structure interaction (SSI) analyses methods. In literature, it is noted that varying soil conditions and foundation types can be modeled by using these SSI approaches with springdashpot couples having certain...
A comparative assessment of an existing reinforced concrete building by using different seismic rehabilitation codes and procedures
Öztürk, İsmail; Sucuoğlu, Haluk; Department of Civil Engineering (2006)
Lateral load carrying capacities of reinforced concrete structures which are designed by considering only gravity loads or according to outdated earthquake codes can be insufficient. The most important problem for these buildings is the limited ductility of the frame elements. How to evaluate the performance of an existing structure and to what level to strengthen it had been major concerns for structural engineers. Recent earthquakes which occurred in the Marmara Region in the last decade have increased th...
Effect of shear walls on the behavior of reinforced concrete buildings under earthquake loading
Çömlekoğlu, Hakkı Gürhan; Burak Bakır, Burcu; Department of Civil Engineering (2009)
An analytical study was performed to evaluate the effect of shear wall ratio on the dynamic behavior of mid-rise reinforced concrete structures. The primary aim of this study is to examine the influence of shear wall area to floor area ratio on the dynamic performance of a building. Besides, the effect of shear wall configuration and area of existing columns on the seismic performance of the buildings were also investigated. For this purpose, twenty four mid-rise building models that have five and eight sto...
Investigation of strenghthening techniques using pseudo-dynamic testing
Kurt, Efe Gökçe; Özcebe, Güney; Department of Civil Engineering (2010)
Pseudo-dynamic testing was employed to observe the seismic performance of three different retrofit methods on two story three bay reinforced concrete frame structures. The three test frames have hollow clay tile (HCT) infills in the central bay. All of the test frames represent the seismic deficiencies of the Turkish construction practice such as use of plain reinforcing bars, low strength concrete and insufficient confining steel. Two non-invasive and occupant friendly retrofit schemes suggested in the Tur...
Analytical investigation of aashto lrfd response modification factors and seismic performance levels of circular bridge columns
Erdem, Arda; Caner, Alp; Department of Civil Engineering (2010)
Current seismic design approach of bridge structures can be categorized into two distinctive methods: (i) force based and (ii) performance based. AASHTO LRFD seismic design specification is a typical example of force based design approach especially used in Turkey. Three different importance categories are presented as “Critical Bridges”, “Essential Bridges” and “Other Bridges” in AASHTO LRFD. These classifications are mainly based on the serviceability requirement of bridges after a design earthquake. The ...
Citation Formats
IEEE
ACM
APA
CHICAGO
MLA
BibTeX
A. G. Özcebe, “A comperative assessment of available methods for seismic performance evaluation of buried structures,” M.S. - Master of Science, Middle East Technical University, 2009.