A systematic critique of formal democracy in light of radical democracy: towards re-politization of the people

Akkın, İbrahim Okan
In light of the notions of freedom, legitimacy, equality, autonomy, plurality, publicity and action in the philosophies of Rousseau and Arendt, it can be seen that formal democracy, having ceased to be the expression of the sovereignty of the people, fell into a legitimacy crisis and has become a system which makes the people apolitical. Behind these problems, there are many reasons like the ethical deficiency of the monetarist system, deputies’ abuse of authority and tyranny of the majority. The facts in question have pushed philosophers to re-think the fundamental concepts underlying democracy and search for new conceptions of democracy. Nevertheless, it seems that no political model can succeed unless the people reach a certain level of ethical maturity. In this context, we are confronted with two models: liberal deliberative model which is criticized for giving negative rights priority over the process of public will-formation, and Habermas’ proceduralism which is based on the theory of discourse ethics. Habermasian democracy—which, contrary to majoritarianism, assumes the consent of all people as the basis of legitimacy—has goals like intersubjective understanding through rational justification and consensus in an ideal speech situation. Although it has criticizable sides, being the most appropriate account for our understanding of democracy ethics, which considers politics as a part of being human rather than a matter of governance, proceduralism can be defended with the contributions of Benhabib and Young. In the end, the point is making ethics of democracy prior to political models for re-politization of the people.


Measuring deliberation online: a comparative analysis of discussions on eksi sozluk
Yavuz, Mert; Özçoban Üstüner, Fahriye; Department of Political Science and Public Administration (2020)
As the crisis of representation deepens in the traditional representative democratic institutions, new forms of democracy such as deliberative democracy become more significant. Deliberative Democracy is a form of democracy which centres deliberation and consideration to its core. The objective of this thesis is to measure online deliberative democratic practices on Ekşi Sözlük. As the internet become more reachable, it creates a potential to remove the reasons that created representative democracy. New for...
Focus groups and assemblies in Ankara City Council in the scope of deliberative democracy
Mermer, Elif Meltem; Üstüner, Fahriye; Department of Political Science and Public Administration (2023-2)
Deliberative democracy is one of the new democracy theories put forward as a remedy to the representation crisis in traditional representative democracies. Political decisions are ideally taken by consensus, justified by a culture of discussion in accordance with the discourse ethics within this theory. Mini-publics are also one of the ways in which deliberative democracy is practiced. In this study, the focus group and the assembly meetings of the Ankara City Council were examined within the framewor...
Applying Machiavellian Discourses to Russian Hybrid Warfare
Yaman, Fuat; Kuşçu Bonnenfant, Işık; Department of Eurasian Studies (2022-3)
This thesis aims to analyze the underlying necessitates related to the implementation of the hybrid warfare concept by the Russian Federation within the conceptual framework of Machiavellian political philosophy that prerequisites well-being of the state above all the idealist considerations, thereby requiring the statesman to adapt to whatever changing circumstances necessitate. This thesis claims that certain political and military events that the Russian Federation has witnessed in the near history, such...
The Recent Debate on the Democratic Legitimacy of Judicial Review
Müderrisoğlu, Mehmet; Deveci, Cem; Department of Political Science and Public Administration (2007)
The term 'Costitutional Democracy' is characterized by an underlying conceptual tension between the rule of law and populşar sovereignty. This is reflected in the controversy surrounding the judicial review of legislation in contemporary political systems. In this thesis, the development of the idea of 'governmernt under law' in political thought, contemporary debates on the doctrine of judicial review and normative relation between law and politics is analyzed. It is concluded that both 'constitutionality'...
A survey of the distinction between ethics and politics with an aristotelian appraisal
Çelik, Sinan Kadir; İnam, Ahmet; Department of Philosophy (2010)
In the history of philosophy, ethics and politics have either been considered as two unrelated, irreducible realms or as identical to each other. In the thesis the historical transformation of the problematic relation between ethics and politics is critically evaluated. It is argued that from the emergence of the conflict in Ancient Greece following the “Socratic ideal” to the modern attempt for its resolution by the “Machiavellian revolution,” the prominent theories developed for dealing with the problem h...
Citation Formats
İ. O. Akkın, “A systematic critique of formal democracy in light of radical democracy: towards re-politization of the people,” M.S. - Master of Science, Middle East Technical University, 2011.