Show/Hide Menu
Hide/Show Apps
Logout
Türkçe
Türkçe
Search
Search
Login
Login
OpenMETU
OpenMETU
About
About
Open Science Policy
Open Science Policy
Open Access Guideline
Open Access Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Communities & Collections
Communities & Collections
Help
Help
Frequently Asked Questions
Frequently Asked Questions
Guides
Guides
Thesis submission
Thesis submission
MS without thesis term project submission
MS without thesis term project submission
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission
Publication submission
Supporting Information
Supporting Information
General Information
General Information
Copyright, Embargo and License
Copyright, Embargo and License
Contact us
Contact us
Ecological co-optation in birds
Download
index.pdf
Date
2013
Author
Aköz, Gökçe
Metadata
Show full item record
Item Usage Stats
195
views
86
downloads
Cite This
Natural selection is commonly thought as the engine of ecological diversification, where sexual selection has a secondary role in promoting speciation. Sexual selection is also attributed a primary role in the origin of species, where it produces divergence not in ecological traits, but in sexually selected traits. Ecological co-optation suggests an alternative to these prevailing ideas. Sexual selection alone could drive ecological diversification, where a sexually selected trait is co-opted for a novel viability trait. Such an ecological co-optation will then enable species with newly co-opted trait to exploit a novel niche. In the present study, we test the prediction of ecological co-optation in antbirds, tanagers, and blackbirds. We use sexually selected plumage coloration in these groups, and check whether the birds with colorful plumage differ in their niche use (i.e. habitat range, altitudinal range, and distributional range), by using phylogenetically independent contrasts method, and sister taxa comparisons. Our results show that increasing plumage coloration produces changes in niche uses. Similarly, increasing plumage color differences between sexes leads to changes in niche width, which is a trend consistent with ecological co-optation hypothesis.
Subject Keywords
Birds
,
Bird communities.
,
Ecological heterogeneity.
,
Species diversity.
URI
http://etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616139/index.pdf
https://hdl.handle.net/11511/22760
Collections
Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Thesis
Suggestions
OpenMETU
Core
Molecular phylogeny of relict-endemic Liquidambar orientalis Mill based on sequence diversity of the chloroplast-encoded matK gene
Ozdilek, Asli; Cengel, Burcu; Kandemir, Gaye; Tayanc, Yasemin; Velioglu, Ercan; Kaya, Zeki (2012-02-01)
The genetic diversity and evolutionary divergence in Liquidambar species and Liquidambar orientalis varieties were compared with respect to the matK gene. A total of 66 genotypes from 18 different populations were sampled in southwestern Turkey. The matK region, which is about 1,512 bp in length, was sequenced and studied. L. orientalis, L. styraciflua, and L. formosana had similar magnitude of nucleotide diversity, while L. styraciflua and L. acalycina possessed higher evolutionary divergence. The highest ...
Theoretical Models On Speciation.
Birand Özsoy, Ayşegül Ceren; Kiratli, Ozan; Akoz, Gokce; Alici, Yetkin; Kiratli, Ozan; Akoz, Gokce; Alici, Yetkin(2014-12-31)
In this study, we propose to develop a modeling framework of speciation that incorporates interactions between sexual selection and natural selection with the purpose of addressing the following questions: 1. Under what scenarios could sexual selection act in concert with natural selection and cause reproductive isolation between populations resulting in new species? 2. Could sexual selection cause differences in ecological traits of species that are under natural selection and result in species having wi...
Understanding phytoplankton community assemblage processes of Turkish shallow lakes using different functional diversity components
Acar, Vildan; Özgencil, İbrahim Kaan; Jeppesen, Erik; Beklioğlu, Meryem; Erdoğan, Şeyda (2021-03-05)
In 2001, Tilman defined functional diversity as “the value and distribution of species and their organismal traits that influence the ecosystem functioning”. Since then, scientists have realized that functional diversity may work better than species diversity in explaining and predicting ecosystem level processes. Thus, many have used different functional diversity measurements to explain ecosystem functionality and ecosystem level processes. In our study, by using different functional diversity indices mea...
Patterns of Species Ranges, Speciation, and Extinction
Birand, Aysegul; Vose, Aaron; Gavrilets, Sergey (2012-01-01)
The exact nature of the relationship among species range sizes, speciation, and extinction events is not well understood. The factors that promote larger ranges, such as broad niche widths and high dispersal abilities, could increase the likelihood of encountering new habitats but also prevent local adaptation due to high gene flow. Similarly, low dispersal abilities or narrower niche widths could cause populations to be isolated, but such populations may lack advantageous mutations due to low population si...
Effects of climate change on biodiversity: a case study on four plant species using distribution models
Beton, Damla; Bilgin, Cemal Can; Department of Biology (2011)
Conservation strategies are mainly focused on species existing in an environment shaped by natural and anthropogenic pressures. Yet, evidence shows that climate is changing faster than ever and expected to continue to change in the near future, which can be devastating for plants with restricted ranges. Turkey harbors many endemic species that might be affected from these changes. However, available data is scarce and biased, complicating the anticipation of future changes. Aim of this study is to improve o...
Citation Formats
IEEE
ACM
APA
CHICAGO
MLA
BibTeX
G. Aköz, “Ecological co-optation in birds,” M.S. - Master of Science, Middle East Technical University, 2013.