Show/Hide Menu
Hide/Show Apps
Logout
Türkçe
Türkçe
Search
Search
Login
Login
OpenMETU
OpenMETU
About
About
Open Science Policy
Open Science Policy
Open Access Guideline
Open Access Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Communities & Collections
Communities & Collections
Help
Help
Frequently Asked Questions
Frequently Asked Questions
Guides
Guides
Thesis submission
Thesis submission
MS without thesis term project submission
MS without thesis term project submission
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission
Publication submission
Supporting Information
Supporting Information
General Information
General Information
Copyright, Embargo and License
Copyright, Embargo and License
Contact us
Contact us
Anti-terror legislations after 9/11: a comparative look at western and turkish debates
Download
index.pdf
Date
2013
Author
Akkaya, Ahmet
Metadata
Show full item record
Item Usage Stats
292
views
110
downloads
Cite This
This thesis problematizes the main assumptions of civil liberties literature on the debates of anti-terror legislations enacted after 9/11. The main assumption of the civil liberties literature in opposition to anti-terror regime that is based on dichotomy of security and liberties in the politics, and its claim about prioritization of the security led to authoritarianism are examined. Basing on the closer investigation of liberal thinkers in terms of conceptualization of security and historical investigation of the politics of security in liberal state, in the thesis it is argued that rather than any dichotomy, the prioritization of security for protection of market order dominates the history of liberalism, and by liberties and freedoms only the market freedoms are meant. In addition to that, it is also argued that the conceptualization of the authoritarianization by the civil liberties literature is misleading because of its limitation to 9/11 context and shadows the neo-liberal transition of the state. In this context, the debate in Turkey on the revision of the Suppression of Terrorism Law in 2006, and institutional framework of the debate that is based on claim for domination of strong state in Turkey are examined. It is argued that the main concern of civil liberties opposition in Turkish to the revision was to oppose strong position of the army in politics for promotion of democratization, which is understood as strengthening of civilian government. In the thesis it is argued that, in addition to misleading assumption of the civil liberties literature in terms of conceptualization of authoritarianization, the misleading conceptualization of democratization led to absorption of the arguments of the literature by ruling government, AKP, for support to the legislations of the bill in the way that was opposed by civil liberties literature.
Subject Keywords
Civil rights.
,
Freedom of expression.
,
Freedom of movement.
URI
http://etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616501/index.pdf
https://hdl.handle.net/11511/23143
Collections
Graduate School of Social Sciences, Thesis
Suggestions
OpenMETU
Core
Securing freedom of movement of persons in the EU : a governmentality perspective
Arcan, Özge; Ertuğrul, Kürşad; Department of Political Science and Public Administration (2010)
This thesis examines how the right of free movement of persons is governed through surveillance databases represented as security measures by applying the governmentality perspective. In order to do that, the study focuses on the relationship between freedom of movement, security and surveillance databases in the European Union such as Schengen Information System (SIS), European Dactylographic System (EURODAC) and the Europol Computer System (TECS). The main argument of the thesis is to analyze the role of ...
Crisis of Turkish parliamentary democracy through Carl schmitt : 1971-1980
Bulut, Dolunay; Çırakman Deveci, Aslı; Department of Political Science and Public Administration (2013)
This thesis examines the political conditions of Turkey from March 12 1971 to September 12 1980 with the use of Carl Schmitt’s concept of the political, critique of parliamentary democracy and concept of partisan to analyze the relation between main political actors of the period. The main theme of this study is how the friend and enemy distinction would be produced in the interactions of the parliament, the military and partisan and which concepts would be applied to define the friend and enemy. This study...
Transformation of the State and Class Relations: Furthering Authoritarianism in Turkey
Topal Yılmaz, Aylin (null; 2017-11-09)
This paper aims to contribute to the debate on the transformation of state in different historically specific contexts by problematising the concept of authoritarian neoliberalism. It intends to do so by exploring the reorganisation of social forces and transformation of state power within an authoritarian state form as exemplified by the case of Turkey. It will also attempt to refresh class analysis in order to develop a better understanding of different modalities of reproduction of labour quite often wit...
Local Entrepreneurialism and State Rescaling in Turkey
Bayırbağ, Mustafa Kemal (SAGE Publications, 2010-02-01)
The paper examines the links between the rise of local entrepreneurialism and state rescaling in a neo-liberal context. The thrust of the article is that the agency of localities, increasingly manifested in the form of local entrepreneurialism, emerges through the political activism of a local bourgeoisie, in pursuit of a multiscalar local accumulation strategy. The article focuses on the spatial interest representation strategies of the local bourgeoisie introducing the concept of scalar strategies of repr...
Problems of nepotism and favouritism in the police organization in Turkey
Mutlu, K (2000-01-01)
Policing in a democratic, free society is one of the essential arguments in the literature. However, the data collected from the police chiefs (N = 306) show that nepotism and favouritism enforced mostly by politicians, are the main problems in police organization in Turkey. That means that legality is ignored by the governing political parties at the expense of democratization of policing. Consequently, law enforcement and maintaining social order within the principles of democracy are Problematic in Turke...
Citation Formats
IEEE
ACM
APA
CHICAGO
MLA
BibTeX
A. Akkaya, “Anti-terror legislations after 9/11: a comparative look at western and turkish debates,” M.S. - Master of Science, Middle East Technical University, 2013.