Exploration of preservice teachers’ reflective judgment and argumentation skills revealed in a socioscientific issues-based inquiry laboratory course

Download

index.pdf

Date

2014

Author

Karışan, Dilek

Metadata

Show full item record

Item Usage Stats

366
views

231
downloads

This study aimed to explore preservice teachers’ (PTs) reflective judgment skills and determine the argumentation pattern used during argumentation in socioscientific issues (SSI) based Inquiry Laboratory Course (ILC). The association between reflective judgment skills and argumentation pattern was also investigated in SSI-based ILC. The participants of the study were 20 PTs from the Department of Elementary Education at a large, research oriented public university in Turkey. Qualitative research method was used in this study. During SSI-based ILC five socioscientific issues (transportation issue, food additives, alternative energy sources, climate change, and the industrial revolution) were used. PTs’ laboratory manuals, interviews and classroom discussions were analyzed qualitatively. In addition to qualitative analysis, quantitative analysis by using chi square, fisher exact test on what correlations were presented to address hypothesized relationships between v reflective judgment stages and argumentation levels within five different socioscientific issues. Results of the study showed that PTs’ Reflective Judgment Model (RJM) scores tended to increase from the first experiment to last experiment. In that, the class average scores of RJM increased from first experiments to last experiments In addition to class average scores, number of reflective PTs also increased from three to nine. Being reflective on SSI, PTs’ also used different levels of argumentation. Their use of evidence to support conflicting ideas tended to increase as their use of incorrect or insufficient use of evidence decreased. Finally, the association between reflective judgment skills and argumentation pattern revealed that reflective PTs tend to have of highest level argumentation whereas prereflective PTs tend to have lowest level argumentation skills across different SSI.

Subject Keywords

Science, Science, Student teachers, Student teachers, Teaching, Inquiry-based learning., Critical thinking., Elementary school teaching.

URI

http://etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12617277/index.pdf
https://hdl.handle.net/11511/23546

Collections

Graduate School of Social Sciences, Thesis

Suggestions

OpenMETU
Core

Developing preservice science teachers’ socioscientific reasoning through socioscientific issues-focused course Cansız, Nurcan; Yılmaz Tüzün, Özgül; Sadler, Troy D.; Department of Elementary Education (2014) The purpose of this study was to investigate how preservice science teachers’ (PSTs) socioscientific reasoning changes in response to participation in a socioscientific issues-focused course. Socioscientific issues (SSI) are complex, uncertain, lack clear-cut solutions; require ongoing research and examining from multiple perspectives. Individuals should recognize the complexities associated with SSI, examine them from multiple perspectives and, appreciate the need for ongoing inquiry to negotiate and resol...
Analyzing collective efficacy of preservice science teachers in science methods course Atasoy, Volkan; Çakıroğlu, Jale; Department of Educational Sciences (2016) This study was aimed to examine preservice teachers who work in the same group in terms of collective efficacy. The participants of this study were four preservice science teachers in third year of science teacher education program. This study was conducted in science methods course. In this course, the participants as a group were expected to prepare lesson plans according to newly learned science teaching methods during a semester. Interviews, observation, preservice teachers’ critique papers, lesson plan...
Quality of preservice teachers argumentation in socioscientific issues context KARIŞAN KORUCU, DİLEK; Yılmaz Tüzün, Özgül; Zeidler, Dana Lewis (2017-10-01) This study aimed to explore preservice teachers’ (PTs) argumentation quality during socioscientific issues (SSI) based classroom discussions. The participants of the study were 20 PTs from the Department of Elementary Education at a large, research oriented public university in Turkey. Qualitative case study method was used in this study. The study covered four socioscientific issues (food additives, alternative energy sources, climate change, and the industrial revolution). Each issue was discussed in the ...
Exploring preservice science teachers’ energy conservation behavior through motivation, psychological needs and attitude: further supported with their awareness Çakır Yıldırım, Birgül; Yılmaz Tüzün, Özgül; Department of Elementary Education (2017) The primary focus of this study was to examine the relationships among attitudes toward energy conservation, self-determined motivation and basic psychological needs of preservice science teachers. To this end a model showing the relationship among these variables was suggested. In order to better understand the observed relationships in the model, interviews with PSTs were conducted. For the purpose of the study mixed method was used. In quantitative part of the study, 1136 preservice science teachers, who...
Environmental moral reasoning patterns of pre-service science teachers and their relationships to epistemological beliefs and values Tuncay Yüksel, Büşra; Yılmaz Tüzün, Özgül; Department of Elementary Education (2016) The overarching purpose of this study was to examine environmental moral reasoning patterns of pre-service science teachers in relation to epistemological beliefs and values. To serve for this purpose, four scenarios that reflect different environmental moral dilemma situations taking place in four outdoor recreation contexts (i.e., hiking, picnicking, fishing, camping) were used. By its design, the study was a correlational research and data on environmental moral reasoning, epistemological beliefs, and va...

Citation Formats

D. Karışan, “Exploration of preservice teachers’ reflective judgment and argumentation skills revealed in a socioscientific issues-based inquiry laboratory course,” Ph.D. - Doctoral Program, Middle East Technical University, 2014.