Show/Hide Menu
Hide/Show Apps
Logout
Türkçe
Türkçe
Search
Search
Login
Login
OpenMETU
OpenMETU
About
About
Open Science Policy
Open Science Policy
Open Access Guideline
Open Access Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Communities & Collections
Communities & Collections
Help
Help
Frequently Asked Questions
Frequently Asked Questions
Guides
Guides
Thesis submission
Thesis submission
MS without thesis term project submission
MS without thesis term project submission
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission
Publication submission
Supporting Information
Supporting Information
General Information
General Information
Copyright, Embargo and License
Copyright, Embargo and License
Contact us
Contact us
Quality of preservice teachers argumentation in socioscientific issues context
Download
index.pdf
Date
2017-10-01
Author
KARIŞAN KORUCU, DİLEK
Yılmaz Tüzün, Özgül
Zeidler, Dana Lewis
Metadata
Show full item record
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License
.
Item Usage Stats
213
views
0
downloads
Cite This
This study aimed to explore preservice teachers’ (PTs) argumentation quality during socioscientific issues (SSI) based classroom discussions. The participants of the study were 20 PTs from the Department of Elementary Education at a large, research oriented public university in Turkey. Qualitative case study method was used in this study. The study covered four socioscientific issues (food additives, alternative energy sources, climate change, and the industrial revolution). Each issue was discussed in the classroom and each discussion was video recorded. Video recordings were transcribed verbatim and used as data source. Classroom discussions verbatim transcribes were analyzed by using a modified version of Toulmin’s argumentation pattern (TAP) model. The modified approach was found to be more conducive to informal argumentation patterns, in order to analyze preservice teachers’ use of claims, grounds, warrants, backings, and rebuttals that support their debate positions, as well as their ability to use evidence-based reasoning, form coherent lines of reasoning, and use of correct (appropriate) evidence. Results of the study revealed that preservice teachers’ use of evidence to support conflicting ideas tended to increase as their use of incorrect or insufficient use of evidence decreased through the present study.
Subject Keywords
Argumentation
,
Socioscientific issues
,
Preservice teachers
,
Critical thinking
URI
https://hdl.handle.net/11511/36653
Journal
Journal of Human Sciences
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14687/jhs.v14i4.4949
Collections
Department of Mathematics and Science Education, Article
Suggestions
OpenMETU
Core
Exploration of preservice teachers’ reflective judgment and argumentation skills revealed in a socioscientific issues-based inquiry laboratory course
Karışan, Dilek; Yılmaz Tüzün, Özgül; Zeidler, Dana L.; Department of Elementary Education (2014)
This study aimed to explore preservice teachers’ (PTs) reflective judgment skills and determine the argumentation pattern used during argumentation in socioscientific issues (SSI) based Inquiry Laboratory Course (ILC). The association between reflective judgment skills and argumentation pattern was also investigated in SSI-based ILC. The participants of the study were 20 PTs from the Department of Elementary Education at a large, research oriented public university in Turkey. Qualitative research method was...
Middle Scool Students' Informal Reasoning Quality, Attitudes Towards Socioscientific Issues and Motivation to Learn Science
Manay, Büşra; Yılmaz Tüzün, Özgül; Department of Secondary Science and Mathematics Education (2022-12-2)
The aim of the present study was investigating the relationship between students’ informal reasoning quality regarding socio-scientific issues (SSI), attitudes toward SSI and their motivation to learn science. Data were obtained by using Informal Reasoning on SSI questionnaire, Pupils’ Attitudes Towards Socio-scientific Issues (PASSI) and Students’ Motivation toward Science Learning (SMTSL). The participants were 523 middle school students in 7th and 8th grades in Artuklu district of Mardin. Correlational ...
Enhancing preservice science teachers’ SSI teaching self-efficacy beliefs and character and values for global citizenship
Yılmaz Tüzün, Özgül; Çakıroğlu, Jale (ERPA: Educational Researches and Publications Association; 2017-05-21)
The purpose of this study was to enhance preservice sc teachers’ SSI teaching self-efficacy beliefs and their character and values for global citizenship. A total of 52 senior PSTs participated to the study. The data were collected by utilizing two instruments: SSI Teaching Self-Efficacy Beliefs Instrument, and Character and Values as Global Citizens Assessment Questionnaire and they were admnistered as pre and post surveys as the begining and ant the end of Science Technology Society course. The results re...
Analyzing collective efficacy of preservice science teachers in science methods course
Atasoy, Volkan; Çakıroğlu, Jale; Department of Educational Sciences (2016)
This study was aimed to examine preservice teachers who work in the same group in terms of collective efficacy. The participants of this study were four preservice science teachers in third year of science teacher education program. This study was conducted in science methods course. In this course, the participants as a group were expected to prepare lesson plans according to newly learned science teaching methods during a semester. Interviews, observation, preservice teachers’ critique papers, lesson plan...
The Impact of Experiences on Preservice Science Teachers' Self-Efficacy in Teaching Science Concepts in the Context of Socioscientific Issues
Bostancı, Burcu; Yılmaz Tüzün, Özgül (2022-9-01)
This study aims to explore the impact of experiences on preservice science teachers' self-efficacy in teaching science concepts in the context of socioscientific issues (SSI). The research employed a mixed-method design, where qualitative data were collected to supplement quantitative findings. The SSI-related self-efficacy beliefs scale and semi-structured interviews were used to collect data from 38 senior preservice science teachers pursuing their education in a public university in Turkey. The findings ...
Citation Formats
IEEE
ACM
APA
CHICAGO
MLA
BibTeX
D. KARIŞAN KORUCU, Ö. Yılmaz Tüzün, and D. L. Zeidler, “Quality of preservice teachers argumentation in socioscientific issues context,”
Journal of Human Sciences
, pp. 3504–3504, 2017, Accessed: 00, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://hdl.handle.net/11511/36653.