A Solution to the knowability paradox and the paradox of idealization in modal epistemic languages /

Download
2014
Akçelik, Oğuz
Human beings are endowed with finite cognitive capacities so that there are forever unknown truths. This fact is stated by non-omniscience thesis (NO). On the other hand many philosophers, especially semantic antirealists, hold that all truths (even the unknown ones) are knowable, and this is stated by the knowability principle (KP). The so-called Knowability Paradox consists in the derivation of a contradiction from the conjunction of (NO) and (KP). We shall show that the derivation of such a contradiction can be blocked by interpreting (NO) as the thesis that there are truths forever unknown to actual agents. We further provide a solution to the so-called Paradox of Idealization which consists in the derivation of a contradiction from the following, initially plausible, premises. First, thesis (FU) stating that there are feasibly unknowable truths in the sense of truths knowable only by idealized agents, second, thesis (NI) stating that there are no idealized agents, and third, above mentioned thesis (KP). We show that by interpreting (NI) as stating that no actual agent is idealized, the derivation of contradiction from the conjunction of (FU), (NI), and (KP) is blocked.

Suggestions

A Solution to the Paradox of Idealization in Modal Epistemic Languages
Akçelik, Oğuz (2016-02-01)
Human beings are endowed with finite cognitive capacities so that there are forever unknowntruths. This fact is stated by non-omniscience thesis (NO). On the other hand many philosophers, especially semantic anti-realists, hold that all truths (even the unknown ones)are knowable, and this is stated by the knowability principle (KP). The so-called Paradox of Idealization consists in the derivation of a contradiction from the following, initially plausible, premises. First, thesis (FU) stating that there ...
A coherentist approach to the justification of scientific theories
Kamözüt, Mehmet Cem; Sayan, Erdinç; Department of Philosophy (2008)
Philosophers of science have long realized that it is not possible to decide which scientific theory is true just by relying on their empirical adequacy. That theories should possess other virtues in order to be accepted by the scientific community is well understood. Nevertheless, empirical adequacy remained as having a privileged value among these virtues. In this thesis I argue that scientific theories are accepted or rejected on the bases of an evaluation of their degree of coherence. In such a coherent...
A study of the self in Nietzsche's fatalistic universe of eternal recurrence
Canbolat, Argun Abrek; Parkan, Barış; Department of Philosophy (2009)
The doctrine of eternal recurrence is not only an aspect of Nietzsche’s philosophy, but a notion that structures the base of his philosophy. The doctrine is analyzed by many interpreters in various ways. The cosmological and the ethical-existential approaches to the doctrine are at the very base wrong. The doctrine’s impact cannot be adequately understood in these terms. Besides, the doctrine of eternal recurrence has multiple problems within it, problems which can be solved if the doctrine is understood an...
The Uses of the World Soul in Plato's Timaeus
Evren, Şahan; Bağçe, Samet; Department of Philosophy (2009)
The purpose of the present study is to assess the explanatory value of the concept of the World Soul in the cosmological account of Plato’s Timaeus. The World Soul plays a crucial role in the account of the world of Becoming in the Timaeus and in Plato’s philosophy of science. The World Soul explains why there is motion at all in the universe and sustains the regularity and uniformity of the motion of the celestial objects. Its constitution and the way it is generated by the Demiurge endow it an intermediar...
The growing desert: nihilism and metaphysics in Martin Heidegger's thought
Duman, Musa; İnam, Ahmet; Department of Philosophy (2009)
In this study, we explore Heidegger’s understanding of nihilism as the essential dimension of metaphysics, of metaphysical experience of Being, and in the following, we address his responses to it. Heidegger takes nihilism as rooted in the metaphysical way of thinking, hence metaphysics and nihilism standing in a primordial identity. Such metaphysical way of thinking as a framework in which Being is experinced and articulated, explicitly or implicitly in all areas of Western culture, from art to science, gi...
Citation Formats
O. Akçelik, “A Solution to the knowability paradox and the paradox of idealization in modal epistemic languages /,” M.S. - Master of Science, Middle East Technical University, 2014.