Show/Hide Menu
Hide/Show Apps
Logout
Türkçe
Türkçe
Search
Search
Login
Login
OpenMETU
OpenMETU
About
About
Open Science Policy
Open Science Policy
Open Access Guideline
Open Access Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Communities & Collections
Communities & Collections
Help
Help
Frequently Asked Questions
Frequently Asked Questions
Guides
Guides
Thesis submission
Thesis submission
MS without thesis term project submission
MS without thesis term project submission
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission
Publication submission
Supporting Information
Supporting Information
General Information
General Information
Copyright, Embargo and License
Copyright, Embargo and License
Contact us
Contact us
A Solution to the Paradox of Idealization in Modal Epistemic Languages
Date
2016-02-01
Author
Akçelik, Oğuz
Metadata
Show full item record
Item Usage Stats
203
views
0
downloads
Cite This
Human beings are endowed with finite cognitive capacities so that there are forever unknowntruths. This fact is stated by non-omniscience thesis (NO). On the other hand many philosophers, especially semantic anti-realists, hold that all truths (even the unknown ones)are knowable, and this is stated by the knowability principle (KP). The so-called Paradox of Idealization consists in the derivation of a contradiction from the following, initially plausible, premises. First, thesis (FU) stating that there are feasibly unknowable truths in thesense of truths knowable only by idealized agents , second, thesis (NI) stating that there are no idealized agents, and third, above mentioned thesis (KP). We show that by interpreting (NI) asstating that no actual agent is idealized, the derivation of contradiction from the conjunctionof (FU), (NI), and (KP) is blocked.
Subject Keywords
The Paradox of idealization
,
Modal epistemic languages
,
Possible world semantics
URI
http://www.phil.cam.ac.uk/events/camb-grad-conf-2016
https://hdl.handle.net/11511/71314
Conference Name
Ninth Annual Cambridge Graduate Conference on the Philosophy of Mathematics and Logic (2016)
Collections
Department of Philosophy, Conference / Seminar
Suggestions
OpenMETU
Core
A Solution to the knowability paradox and the paradox of idealization in modal epistemic languages /
Akçelik, Oğuz; Grünberg, Teo; Department of Philosophy (2014)
Human beings are endowed with finite cognitive capacities so that there are forever unknown truths. This fact is stated by non-omniscience thesis (NO). On the other hand many philosophers, especially semantic antirealists, hold that all truths (even the unknown ones) are knowable, and this is stated by the knowability principle (KP). The so-called Knowability Paradox consists in the derivation of a contradiction from the conjunction of (NO) and (KP). We shall show that the derivation of such a contradiction...
A Philosophical approach to upper-level ontologies
Satıoğlu, Dilek; Zambak, Aziz Fevzi; Department of Philosophy (2015)
The aim of this thesis is to provide a philosophical approach to upper-level ontologies. The ontologies and/or categorical system of Aristotle, Kant, Husserl, and Quine are evaluated in order to give a philosophical understanding of ontologies. After an explanation of the developments in ontology as a new interdisciplinary study, the most well known upper-level ontologies, BFO, DOLCE, SUMO, and Cyc, are analysed technically. In the light of philosophical ontologies and categorical systems, these upper-level...
Free will and determinism: are they even relevant to each other?
Çağatay, Hasan; Grünberg, Teo; Department of Philosophy (2012)
Many philosophers tend to defend the view that there is a significant relation between the problem of determinism / indeterminism and the problem of free will. The belief that there exists such a significant relation is supported by our intuitions; however, in this thesis, I defend just the opposite view: free will has no significant dependence on the deterministic or indeterministic character of causal relations. In the same way, I propose that the question, whether or not determinism is true, cannot be an...
A new theory of content
Aytekin, Tevfik; Sayan, Erdinç; Department of Philosophy (2003)
Naturalistic philosophers of meaning try to define the recalcitrant concept of reference in terms respected by the empirical science, such as causality or teleology. In this thesis, after a brief introduction to these trials is given, Fodors theory of content in terms of asymmetric dependence is examined in some depth. I claim that although this theory involves an important insight, it is an unsatisfactory attempt at reduction of the notion of reference. I develop a new theory of content, which does not hav...
A generic approach towards finite growth with examples of athlete's heart, cardiac dilation, and cardiac wall thickening
Göktepe, Serdar; Kuhl, Ellen (2010-10-01)
The objective of this work is to establish a generic continuum-based computational concept for finite growth of living biological tissues. The underlying idea is the introduction of an incompatible growth configuration which naturally introduces a multiplicative decomposition of the deformation gradient into an elastic and a growth part. The two major challenges of finite growth are the kinematic characterization of the growth tensor and the identification of mechanical driving forces for its evolution. Mot...
Citation Formats
IEEE
ACM
APA
CHICAGO
MLA
BibTeX
O. Akçelik, “A Solution to the Paradox of Idealization in Modal Epistemic Languages,” presented at the Ninth Annual Cambridge Graduate Conference on the Philosophy of Mathematics and Logic (2016), Cambridge, Kanada, 2016, Accessed: 00, 2021. [Online]. Available: http://www.phil.cam.ac.uk/events/camb-grad-conf-2016.