Show/Hide Menu
Hide/Show Apps
Logout
Türkçe
Türkçe
Search
Search
Login
Login
OpenMETU
OpenMETU
About
About
Open Science Policy
Open Science Policy
Open Access Guideline
Open Access Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Communities & Collections
Communities & Collections
Help
Help
Frequently Asked Questions
Frequently Asked Questions
Guides
Guides
Thesis submission
Thesis submission
MS without thesis term project submission
MS without thesis term project submission
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission
Publication submission
Supporting Information
Supporting Information
General Information
General Information
Copyright, Embargo and License
Copyright, Embargo and License
Contact us
Contact us
Time as the ground of transcendence: a dialogue between Kant and Heidegger
Download
index.pdf
Date
2020
Author
Beşkardeşler, Sedef
Metadata
Show full item record
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License
.
Item Usage Stats
441
views
162
downloads
Cite This
In this dissertation, I attempt to present a critical dialogue between Immanuel Kant and Martin Heidegger in terms of time. Heidegger sees his own project of the interpretation of Critique of Pure Reason as a retrieval (Wiederholung) of the problem of the ground laying of metaphysics. I do aim at furthering the dialogue first by basing my reading on the way that Heidegger interprets Kant and second by tracing what Heidegger should have thought within the relevant context. In this regard, my project is to pursue the way that Heidegger derives his understanding of temporality and transcendence from his reading of Critique of Pure Reason which at the same time offers a novel evaluation concerning the main yet subtle themes of the latter, such as time as pure image. Although it is commonly acknowledged that Heidegger is indebted to Kant for his own understanding of temporality, the resultant view he came up with has given rise to strong approvals or rejections. Although those reactions definitely have significance in the literature, Heidegger’s methodology seems to remain unquestioned to a great extent. The dissertation in its culmination aims to fill this lacuna in the relevant literature — and it does so, on the one hand, by putting Heidegger’s methodology into question and, on the other, by indicating an alternative reading regarding the relationship between temporality and transcendence. I suggest that Heidegger’s derivation of temporality from Kant’s threefold synthesis is untenable, yet — as he says for Kant — he indeed does have insight into the inconspicuous, i.e., the pure image of time, which I take to be the only possible background against which Heidegger should and could have characterized temporality as transcendence.
Subject Keywords
Transcendence (Philosophy).
,
Transcendence
,
Temporality
,
Imagination
,
Pure Image
,
Time
URI
http://etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12625355/index.pdf
https://hdl.handle.net/11511/45313
Collections
Graduate School of Social Sciences, Thesis
Suggestions
OpenMETU
Core
Irony as a philosophical attitude in socrates
Korkut, Hacer; İnam, Ahmet; Department of Philosophy (2007)
This thesis analyzes the reasons for Socrates' being presented as a paradoxical figure in the early dialogues of Plato. Irony as a fundamental philosophical attitude in Socratic philosophy is discussed with reference to some of the major philosophers of the history of philosophy. The thesis also suggests the possibility of seeing philosophy as an ironic activity and it traces the etymology of the concept of irony in terms of its philosophical importance.
Revealing the fact: the inseparable relation between the self and time
Çifteci, Volkan; Çırakman, Elif; Department of Philosophy (2017)
The aim of this thesis is to unfold the inseparable relation between time and the self. The claim I will put forward is that every inquiry concerning the self directly brings us face to face with time itself, and vice versa. This thesis consists of four main parts. In the first part, I shall elaborate Descartes’ and Hume’s accounts of the self and time. In the second part, I will concentrate on Kant’s view of the self and its connection to time. In the third part, first I shall investigate how Bergson ident...
The significance of time in Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason
Çifteci, Volkan; Çırakman, Elif; Department of Philosophy (2011)
The purpose of this thesis is to give an account of the significance of time in Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason by discussing its role in the unification of sensibility and understanding. I primarily investigate the role that time plays in the constitution of objective knowledge. I discuss that since time is the necessary condition for objects to be given to our sensibility, without it any representation would be without a temporal order and perhaps would not make any sense at all. Kant claims that it is ima...
Thinking without the subject: Nietzsche‘s critique of Cartesian and Kantian subjectivity
İlbaşı, Kıvılcım; Çırakman, Elif; Department of Philosophy (2015)
In this M.A. thesis, I investigate Nietzsche‘s critique of subjectivity with regard to the subject-thought relationship as has been conceptualised in modern philosophy. Firstly, I attempt to elucidate the constitution of the subject and the modern image of thinking by focusing on the ideas of two major figures of modernity, namely, Descartes and Kant. Then, I problematize the concept of the subject with respect to Nietzsche‘s genealogical critique, and try to show that the subjectivist interpretation of the...
Heidegger and Foucault: On the Relation Between the Anxiety-Engendering-Truth and Being-Towards-Freedom
Karademir, Aret (Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2013-08-01)
In his very last, now famous, interview, Michel Foucault states that his philosophical thought was shaped by his reading of Heidegger, even though he does not specify what aspects of Heidegger's philosophy inspired him in the first place. However, his last interview is not the only place where Foucault refers to Heidegger as his intellectual guide. In his 1981/1982 lecture course, The Hermeneutics of the Subject, Foucault confesses that the way Heidegger conceptualized the relationship between subject and t...
Citation Formats
IEEE
ACM
APA
CHICAGO
MLA
BibTeX
S. Beşkardeşler, “Time as the ground of transcendence: a dialogue between Kant and Heidegger,” Thesis (Ph.D.) -- Graduate School of Social Sciences. Philosophy., Middle East Technical University, 2020.