Show/Hide Menu
Hide/Show Apps
Logout
Türkçe
Türkçe
Search
Search
Login
Login
OpenMETU
OpenMETU
About
About
Open Science Policy
Open Science Policy
Open Access Guideline
Open Access Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Communities & Collections
Communities & Collections
Help
Help
Frequently Asked Questions
Frequently Asked Questions
Guides
Guides
Thesis submission
Thesis submission
MS without thesis term project submission
MS without thesis term project submission
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission
Publication submission
Supporting Information
Supporting Information
General Information
General Information
Copyright, Embargo and License
Copyright, Embargo and License
Contact us
Contact us
Collaboration and free-riding in team contests
Download
10.1016:j.labeco.2017.11.001.pdf
Date
2017-12-01
Author
Büyükboyacı Hanay, Mürüvvet İlknur
Metadata
Show full item record
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License
.
Item Usage Stats
166
views
161
downloads
Cite This
The organization of team contests can enhance productivity if teammates with complementary skills are able to allocate the team's tasks efficiently, but can also suffer from free-riding incentives. We report the results of a real-effort experiment in which production requires the completion of two complementary tasks, at which workers have heterogeneous skills. We vary whether participants: compete individually; compete in teams where each member must complete each task; or compete in teams where the agents can divide tasks between them and potentially specialize in the task they do best. We report three main results. First, individuals who must work alone divide their work time in a way that is qualitatively consistent with the theoretical predictions, but allocate too little time to their weaker task. Second, there is no difference in productivity or free-riding behavior between individual contests and team contests where teammates cannot specialize. Finally, and most notably, when teammates can divide work tasks, they allocate more time to the tasks they are best at and experience a strong productivity gain. This is true even among teams that cannot communicate-despite the potential for coordination failure or coordination on Pareto dominated equilibria-but the effect is strongest when communication is available. (c) 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.
Subject Keywords
Contest
,
Weakest-link technology
,
Comparative advantage
,
Coordination
,
Communication
,
Experiment
,
Team performance
URI
https://hdl.handle.net/11511/48696
Journal
LABOUR ECONOMICS
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2017.11.001
Collections
Department of Economics, Article
Suggestions
OpenMETU
Core
Antecedents of better performing teams: test of perceived team job crafting model
Purtul, Tuğba; Bilgiç, Reyhan; Department of Psychology (2019)
This present study examined the relationship between team performance and its antecedents such as team task characteristics (autonomy, feedback, skill variety, task identity, and task significance), team personality (proactivity, collective efficacy) and interpersonal trust under job demands and resources framework model. Also, the sequential mediating effect of team job crafting and team work engagement in this relationship was investigated. The study surveyed 147 people, comprised of 46 teams, from differ...
Team formation with complementary skills
Büyükboyacı Hanay, Mürüvvet İlknur (Wiley, 2019-11-01)
One explanation for the prevalence of self-managed work teams is that they enable workers with complementary skills to specialize in the tasks they do best, a benefit that may be enhanced if workers can sort themselves into teams. To assess this explanation, we design a real-effort experiment to study the endogenous formation of teams, and its effect on productivity, when specialization either is or is not feasible. We find a strong positive interaction between endogenous team formation and the ability to s...
Evaluation of professional development program designed for artistic gymnastics coaches needs
Kılıç, Koray; İnce, Mustafa Levent (2016-11-04)
The purposes of this study were to 1) determine coaches’ needs by examining athletes’ sport-related outcomes, 2) develop and implement a professional development program for coaches based on the needs arose, and 3) evaluate the effectiveness of the program implemented. For the first purpose, a valid and reliable measurement toolkit (Vierimaa, Erickson, Côté, and Gilbert, 2012) that measures athletes’ perception of “Competence”, “Confidence”, “Connection”, and “Character” was a...
Creating Awareness of Sleep Wake Hours by Gamification
İLHAN, AYŞE EZGİ; Şener Pedgley, Bahar; Hacıhabiboğlu, Hüseyin (2016-04-11)
Gamification can be used to motivate people to carry out hard-to- perform tasks. It can help in changing undesirable habits and in improving a person’s subjective well-being. Sleep-wake behaviors are important determinants of day-to-day well-being. This study aims to find out whether it is possible to modify sleep-wake habits using gamification. To this end, a gamified alarm clock app, Sleepy Bird, was designed and tested in a user study with thirteen participants using gamified and thirteen participants us...
A genetic algorithm for maximum-weighted tree matching problem
Gulek, Mehmet; Toroslu, İsmail Hakkı (Elsevier BV, 2010-09-01)
In hierarchal organizations, for assigning tasks to the divisions of the organization some constraints must be satisfied. This article investigates one such problem in which there are k different tasks to be accomplished and each division's performance on each task may be different and represented by a scalar value. In this article we formally introduce this real life decision problem, named as Maximum-Weighted Tree Matching Problem, and propose a genetic algorithm solution to it, and give some experimental...
Citation Formats
IEEE
ACM
APA
CHICAGO
MLA
BibTeX
M. İ. Büyükboyacı Hanay, “Collaboration and free-riding in team contests,”
LABOUR ECONOMICS
, pp. 162–178, 2017, Accessed: 00, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://hdl.handle.net/11511/48696.