Knowing Wrongly: An Obvious Oxymoron, or a Threat for the Alleged Universality of Epistemological Analyses?

Date

2011-01-01

Author

Baç, Mutlu Murat

Metadata

Show full item record

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Item Usage Stats

174
views

0
downloads

The traditional tripartite and tetrapartite analyses describe the conceptual components of propositional knowledge from a universal epistemic point of view. According to the classical analysis, since truth is a necessary condition of knowledge, it does not snake sense to talk about "false knowledge" or "knowing wrongly." There are nonetheless some natural languages in which speakers ordinarily make statements about a person's knowing a given subject matter wrongly. In this paper, we first provide a brief analysis of "knowing wrongly" in Turkish. Then, taking Allan Hazlett's recent account of the gap between traditional analyses of knowledge and actual epistemic practices of real cognitive agents as a point of departure, we spell out a non-universalist and non-extensionalist perspective on the value of "knowing wrongly."

URI

https://hdl.handle.net/11511/52726

Journal

CROATIAN JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY

Collections

Department of Philosophy, Article

Suggestions

OpenMETU
Core

Mind the Gap: Reconciling Formalism and Intuitionism in Computational Design Research Mennan, Zeynep (Delft University of Technology, 2014) The paper discusses the epistemological and methodological implications of an increasing process of formalisation and naturalisation of knowledge within the context of the complexity paradigm. This process is argued to induce a shift in the nature of notations and representations, to which corresponds an epistemic shift from a graphic to a computational rationality, with substantial effects on current design methodologies and strategies used in computational design. The shortcomings of a heavy formalism are...
Revisiting immanence and conatus in Spinoza Yaylım, Berk; İnam, Ahmet; Department of Philosophy (2015) This thesis focuses on the concept of immanence in Spinoza’s philosophy and its importance in explicating theory of knowledge and conatus. While accounting for immanence, it will seek not only his metaphysics but also a critical discussion of transcendence and emanation. After the metaphysical system behind his philosophy is explained, his defense of necessitarianism will be emphasized. In this study, under the light of these, a coherent interpretation of Spinoza’s solutions, how these relate to his theory ...
Ending the exile of desire in Spinoza and Hegel Cengiz, Övünç; Çırakman, Elif; Department of Philosophy (2007) The main objective of this master’s thesis is to analyze the place assigned to the phenomenon of desire by Hegel and Spinoza, and to show that the main difference between two philosophers in terms of their understanding of desire and human phenomenon consists in their understanding of the relation between the substance and particulars. In order to fulfill the requirements of this objective, what is focused on is, as different from a certain philosophical thought excluding desire from a true account of human...
New directions in the direction of time Bağcı, Gökhan Barış; Grünberg, Teo; Department of Philosophy (2006) This thesis analyzes the direction of time problem in the framework of philosophy of science. The radiation arrow, Newtonian arrow, thermodynamic arrow and quantum mechanical arrow have been studied in detail. The importance of the structure of space-time concerning direction of time is emphasized.
Thinking without the subject: Nietzsche‘s critique of Cartesian and Kantian subjectivity İlbaşı, Kıvılcım; Çırakman, Elif; Department of Philosophy (2015) In this M.A. thesis, I investigate Nietzsche‘s critique of subjectivity with regard to the subject-thought relationship as has been conceptualised in modern philosophy. Firstly, I attempt to elucidate the constitution of the subject and the modern image of thinking by focusing on the ideas of two major figures of modernity, namely, Descartes and Kant. Then, I problematize the concept of the subject with respect to Nietzsche‘s genealogical critique, and try to show that the subjectivist interpretation of the...

Citation Formats

M. M. Baç, “Knowing Wrongly: An Obvious Oxymoron, or a Threat for the Alleged Universality of Epistemological Analyses?,” CROATIAN JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY, pp. 305–321, 2011, Accessed: 00, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://hdl.handle.net/11511/52726.