Show/Hide Menu
Hide/Show Apps
Logout
Türkçe
Türkçe
Search
Search
Login
Login
OpenMETU
OpenMETU
About
About
Open Science Policy
Open Science Policy
Open Access Guideline
Open Access Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Communities & Collections
Communities & Collections
Help
Help
Frequently Asked Questions
Frequently Asked Questions
Guides
Guides
Thesis submission
Thesis submission
MS without thesis term project submission
MS without thesis term project submission
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission
Publication submission
Supporting Information
Supporting Information
General Information
General Information
Copyright, Embargo and License
Copyright, Embargo and License
Contact us
Contact us
A Comparison of Process Ontology Discovery from Organizational Guidelines in Two Different Languages
Date
2017-09-01
Author
Gurbuz, Ozge
Demirörs, Onur
Metadata
Show full item record
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License
.
Item Usage Stats
239
views
0
downloads
Cite This
Process ontologies contain organization's process elements which are related to the business activities, in a structured format. Once organizations establish process ontologies, searching process information as well as discovery, modeling and automation become more efficient. Process ontologies are frequently developed from organizational resources such as guidelines, regulations and procedures by interpreting the document, discovering the process information and building the ontology. The studies depict that the development of process ontologies can be partially automated. However, a significant success factor in this automation is the language of the document and the tools available to interpret the written text in a given language. In this study, we conducted an exploratory case study in order to analyze the potential of process ontology discovery in different languages. We applied the process ontology discovery method we have developed for guidelines written in English and Turkish and compared the success rates. We also discuss the requirements for process discovery automation.
Subject Keywords
Process ontology
,
Business process management
,
Process discovery
URI
https://hdl.handle.net/11511/56736
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/seaa.2017.44
Collections
Graduate School of Informatics, Conference / Seminar
Suggestions
OpenMETU
Core
An investigation of the relationship between joint visual attention and product quality in collaborative business process modeling: a dual eye-tracking study
Fındık Coşkunçay, Duygu; Çakır, Murat Perit (2022-02-01)
Collaborative business process modeling is a collective activity where team members jointly discuss, design, and document business processes. During such activities, team members need to communicate with each other to coordinate the modeling activities, propose and justify changes, and negotiate common terms and definitions. Throughout this process, stakeholders should be aware of when and what kind of changes have been made by each team member on the shared space so that they can discuss design ideas and b...
A Taxonomy for Personal Processes: Results from a Semi-structured Interview
Oruç, Sercan; Eren, Pekin Erhan; Koçyiğit, Altan; Yeralan, Sencer (2019-01-01)
There are few studies conducted on personal processes within the Business Process Management (BPM) domain. Personal processes are looser and more context- and person-dependent compared to the clearly defined business processes. This makes it more challenging to create solutions in this domain. In this study, a taxonomy is developed for personal processes. We used the data collected from semi-structured interviews that we have conducted with a diverse population. We built a taxonomy with 4 classes and 22 sub...
A Transformation approach from eEPC to S-BPM models
Çakar, Başak; Demirörs, Onur; Department of Information Systems (2014)
Business process models are vital assets of organizations. The organizations prefer to use one of the many modeling methods and notations according to its features like tool support, size of user base, ease of use. During the last decade bottom up process modeling approaches such as S-BPM started to become popular among organizations. Many organizations have large process model assets modeled in a top down fashion. As a result, for most organizations to adopt bottom up process modeling approaches the existe...
A mobile flexible business process management system supporting daily life processes and decisions
Oruç, Sercan; Eren, Pekin Erhan; Information Systems (2021-7-27)
Within the Business Process Management domain, only a few studies focus on personal processes. Personal processes are looser and more context- and person-dependent compared to business processes. So, flexibility is a significant concern in Personal Process Management (PPM). In this study, we first conduct semi-structured interviews with a diverse population. Using the collected data, we develop a personal process taxonomy with four classes and twenty-two subclasses. Then, we create a reference model for con...
An approach for decentralized process modeling
Turetken, Oktay; Demirörs, Onur (2007-05-20)
This paper describes a method for organizations to perform process modeling in a decentralized and concurrent manner. The approach is based on the idea that modeling organizations' processes can be performed by individuals actually performing the processes. Instead of having a central and devoted group of people to analyze, understand, model and improve processes, real performers are held responsible to model and improve their own processes concurrently. The paper also summarizes the lessons learned by appl...
Citation Formats
IEEE
ACM
APA
CHICAGO
MLA
BibTeX
O. Gurbuz and O. Demirörs, “A Comparison of Process Ontology Discovery from Organizational Guidelines in Two Different Languages,” 2017, Accessed: 00, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://hdl.handle.net/11511/56736.