Show/Hide Menu
Hide/Show Apps
Logout
Türkçe
Türkçe
Search
Search
Login
Login
OpenMETU
OpenMETU
About
About
Open Science Policy
Open Science Policy
Open Access Guideline
Open Access Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Communities & Collections
Communities & Collections
Help
Help
Frequently Asked Questions
Frequently Asked Questions
Guides
Guides
Thesis submission
Thesis submission
MS without thesis term project submission
MS without thesis term project submission
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission
Publication submission
Supporting Information
Supporting Information
General Information
General Information
Copyright, Embargo and License
Copyright, Embargo and License
Contact us
Contact us
Multidimensional Comparison of Lightweight Steel and Reinforced Concrete Structures: A Case Study
Download
index.pdf
Date
2018-08-01
Author
Celik, Tolga
Kamali, Saeed
Metadata
Show full item record
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License
.
Item Usage Stats
200
views
0
downloads
Cite This
Lightweight steel construction has some undeniable advantages over concrete construction; however, reinforced concrete structures are used ubiquitously in Mediterranean countries and therefore most of the scientific studies have been focused on the reinforced concrete structures. One of the main reasons for not using the lightweight steel construction widely is lack on knowhow about this method. This study is aimed at raising the knowledge about the technical features of cold-formed steel members as well as advantages of lightweight steel structure in comparison with reinforced concrete. To fulfil this aim, a case study was conducted to compare lightweight steel structure with reinforced concrete structure in different points of view in detail. From the case study, it is found out that the building total covered area and mass designed by reinforced concrete structure are 2.6% larger and 9 times greater than the lightweight steel structure respectively. It was also concluded that the total cost ( indirect and direct) and construction duration for the reinforced concrete structural frame are approximately 17.7% and 70.9% respectively higher than constructing the lightweight steel structural frame.
Subject Keywords
General Engineering
URI
https://hdl.handle.net/11511/64562
Journal
TEHNICKI VJESNIK-TECHNICAL GAZETTE
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17559/tv-20160901185826
Collections
Department of Civil Engineering, Article
Suggestions
OpenMETU
Core
Nonlinear analysis of RC frames retrofitted with structural steel elements
Akpınar, Uğur; Binici, Barış; Department of Civil Engineering (2010)
Deficient concrete structures are serious danger in seismic zones. In order to minimize economical and human loss, these structures should be retrofitted. Selecting suitable retrofitting schemes requires detailed investigation of these systems. Considering these facts, this study aims to calibrate analytical models of systems with chevron braces and internal steel frames; and evaluate their seismic performances. First, analytical models of the frames with braces and internal steel frames were prepared and t...
Schedule delay analysis in construction projects: a case study using time impact analysis method
Dayı, Songül; Elias Özkan, Soofia Tahira; Department of Architecture (2010)
Inadequate or weak preparatory work before starting construction of any structure may cause serious problems during the construction period. For example, projects without sufficient detailed drawings or construction schedules and a disorganized building site can create many problems in the management and completion of the construction works. Consequently, the cost of construction increases digressively, the construction duration of the project extends and the quality of construction is affected adversely. T...
Evaluation of performance based displacement limits for reinforced concrete columns under flexure
Solmaz, Taylan; Yakut, Ahmet; Department of Civil Engineering (2010)
Reinforced concrete frame buildings are the most common type of constructions in Turkey which are exposed to various types of forces during their lifetime. Seismic performance of reinforced concrete frame buildings is dominated by columns which can be classified as primary members of these structures. When current codes are considered, all of them contain several provisions in order to implement reliable seismic performances of reinforced concrete columns. In order to evaluate the accuracy of these provisio...
Mechanical properties of cfrp anchorages
Özdemir, Gökhan; Akyüz, Uğurhan; Department of Civil Engineering (2005)
Due to inadequate lateral stiffness, many reinforced concrete buildings are highly damaged or collapsed in Turkey after the major earthquake. To improve the behavior of such buildings and to prevent them from collapse, repair and/or strengthening of some reinforced concrete elements is required. One of the strengthening techniques is the use of CFRP sheets on the existing hollow brick masonry infill. While using the CFRP sheets their attachment to both structural and non-structural members are provided by C...
Fiber reinforced polymer confined rc circularcolumns subjected to axial load and bending moment
Doruk, Koray; Binici, Barış; Department of Civil Engineering (2006)
Fiber reinforced polymers (FRPs) have gained increasing popularity in upgrades of reinforced structural elements due to high strength to weight ratio and ease of application. In this study, the effectiveness of the carbon reinforced polymer wrapping (CFRP) on ductility and strength of circular reinforced concrete columns, made of low strength concrete, is presented. Four circular reinforced columns with similar dimensions, longitudinal and confining steel reinforcement were tested under combined axial load ...
Citation Formats
IEEE
ACM
APA
CHICAGO
MLA
BibTeX
T. Celik and S. Kamali, “Multidimensional Comparison of Lightweight Steel and Reinforced Concrete Structures: A Case Study,”
TEHNICKI VJESNIK-TECHNICAL GAZETTE
, pp. 1234–1242, 2018, Accessed: 00, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://hdl.handle.net/11511/64562.