Identity representations in the narratives on the EU-Turkey relations

Download

10.5281zenodo.2620038.pdf

Date

2019-3-19

Author

Özbey, Ebru Ece
Hauge, Hanna-Lisa
Rumelili, Bahar
Eralp, Atila

Metadata

Show full item record

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Item Usage Stats

190
views

107
downloads

This study aims to situate contemporary debates on the EU-Turkey relations in a broader historical context. It argues that understanding from where current narratives come and identifying their constituents, and particularly the narrators’ mutual perceptions on each other, which have endured through decades or even centuries, contributes to a deeper understanding of the relationship in critical ways. The paper is based on the results of two historically oriented studies carried out within the framework of the FEUTURE project -a narrative analysis as well as an analysis of identity representations since the 19thcentury- both of which adopted a comparative approach by analysing European and Turkish sources. Among others, the paper asserts that the EU and Turkey, both historically and in the present, have been important for each other in their identity construction. It argues that one of the most defining characteristics of the narratives and identities over time is their changing nature. The paper finds that narratives and identity construction processes also intertwined also with drivers at different levels, by the respective historical and political context. From a contemporary perspective, it finds that narratives on both sides have become more conflictual and that relations are likely to be dominated by conflictual elements also in the nearer future. This is, however, coupled with a constantly present conviction of the importance of Turkey for Europe and vice versa.

Subject Keywords

European Union, EU-Turkey Relations, Historical context, Narratives, Narrative analysis, 19th Century, Comparative approach, Identity construction, Conflictual elements, Mutual perceptions

URI

https://hdl.handle.net/11511/68875

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2620038

Collections

Department of International Relations, Article

Suggestions

OpenMETU
Core

Historical Sociology and International Relations: Geopolitics, Capitalism and State System Yalvaç, Faruk (2013-06-01) This article attempts to critically adress the development of the relation between historical sociology and international relations theory. It evaluates the main stages of the historical sociological approaches in IR and the main issues of contention. Historical sociological approaches to IR have evolved from a Weberian stage in 1970s and 80s to a point where it is heavily dominated by historical materialist approaches today. The focus of these debates is to develop a historical materialist undersanding of ...
Narratives of a contested relationship: unravelling the debates in the EU and Turkey Hauge, Hanna-Lisa; Özbey, Ebru Ece; Eralp, Atila; Wessels, Wolfgang(2019-2-25) This paper outlines how narratives on European Union (EU)-Turkey relations changed over time since the 1960s and until the present. Applying a narrative approach, the paper aims to deconstruct a debate, which has been characterized by a plurality or even cacophony of stories by different actors. It presents the most influential narratives of EU institutions and Turkish political actors and traces their change over time as well as the dynamics between them. Based on a qualitative coding of a vast set of offi...
Socio-political identity and intergroup perception : the case of "Ülkücü group" in Turkey Dalmış, İbrahim; İmamoğlu, Emine Olcay; Department of Psychology (2003) This thesis consists of two studies together with a preliminary study, focusing on the issue of ingroup representation of the ülkücü group. The first study, addressing the problems of stereotype content, stereotype accuracy, and stereotype consensus, was based on in-depth interviewing with twenty members of the ülkücü group. It was hypothesized that the group members, when their social identities were salient, would locate the ingroup within a chronic way of looking at the world, namely the perceived contex...
IDEOLOGICAL-POLITICAL CONSIDERATIONS AND THEORETICAL PARTIALITY IN MIDDLE EAST STUDIES: THE BASES FOR TEACHINGS OF HISTORY IN AREA STUDIES Boztemur, Recep (2013-03-01) This study deals basically with a critique of ideological and policy-oriented approaches in area studies, and problems of political interventions and ideological inclinations in the Middle Eastern studies. Politics and ideology not only makes the area more complex to understand, since they aim to meet the needs of the governments, but also prevents the academic studies to develop independently. The study aims at putting forth a historical analysis required both to take the issues of the Middle East studies ...
Europeanization of minorities vs. minorities of europeanization: historicizing european identity Ongur, Hakan Övünç; Yurdusev, Ahmet Nuri; Department of International Relations (2011) The purpose of this dissertation is to answer ‘if we can live together?’, through establishing a historical approach towards the concepts of Europeanization, European identity and the rights of minorities. The main argument reads that within the historical understanding of Europeanization, it is theoretically impossible to speak of a common European identity that European peoples and societies could agree upon. The problem is that such impossibility cannot be explained by the mainstream political identity a...

Citation Formats

E. E. Özbey, H.-L. Hauge, B. Rumelili, and A. Eralp, “Identity representations in the narratives on the EU-Turkey relations,” pp. 1–27, 2019, Accessed: 00, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://hdl.handle.net/11511/68875.