The Imaginary and Descartes’s Paradoxical Rationality

Date

2018-05-01

Author

İbrahimhakkıoğlu, Fulden

Metadata

Show full item record

Item Usage Stats

157
views

0
downloads

The imaginary plays a distinctive role in Descartes’ writings. While its place is often articulated in negative terms (as that which is illusory or deceptive), it nonetheless serves as an important ground for the Cartesian project to unfold. Descartes’ search for clear and distinct ideas takes place through reason’s interplay with the imaginary. While its reliability as a source of knowledge is ultimately dismissed, the imaginary is that which is never truly mastered or overcome. It is a source of dread and anxiety; which reason seeks to mitigate. This essay explores such interplay between the real and the imaginary, between reason and “unreason” in Descartes’ Meditations as well as his Olympica, which contains some precursor themes and tropes to The Meditations. While the Cartesian project seeks to separate the real from the imaginary and reason from unreason, I argue that the manner in which his discourse unfolds reveals their inextricable tie.

Subject Keywords

The imaginary, The body, Olympica, Rationality, Descartes, Hayali olan, Beden, Akılcılık

URI

https://hdl.handle.net/11511/71961
https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/804435

Journal

FLSF (Felsefe ve Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi)

Collections

Department of Philosophy, Article

Suggestions

OpenMETU
Core

The primacy of falsity deviant origins in Deleuze Shores, Corry Michael (2019-01-01) Deleuze's notion of the powers of the false is central to his philosophy of truth and becoming, but it is also one of his most complexly elaborated ideas, with its various diverging conceptual dimensions inviting further analysis and reconfiguration. One perplexing conception here is that falsity is more primary than truth, because it is what creates truths of the highest order. We examine the thinking behind this idea by proceeding through Deleuze's notions of the Devil and the sorcerer, Dupreelian consoli...
The growing desert: nihilism and metaphysics in Martin Heidegger's thought Duman, Musa; İnam, Ahmet; Department of Philosophy (2009) In this study, we explore Heidegger’s understanding of nihilism as the essential dimension of metaphysics, of metaphysical experience of Being, and in the following, we address his responses to it. Heidegger takes nihilism as rooted in the metaphysical way of thinking, hence metaphysics and nihilism standing in a primordial identity. Such metaphysical way of thinking as a framework in which Being is experinced and articulated, explicitly or implicitly in all areas of Western culture, from art to science, gi...
The anarchy of justice: Hesiod’s Chaos, Anaximander’s apeiron, and geometric thought Grıffıth, James Edmond Carr (2022-04-01) This article examines Hesiod’s Chaos and Anaximander’s apeiron individually and inrelation to each other through the frame of René Descartes’ notion of natural geometry andthrough bounds and limits in Euclid and Immanuel Kant. Thanks to this frame, it shows that, inhis poetic vision, Hesiod saw in Chaos the act of bounding such that different things can appearwhile, in his speculative vision, Anaximander saw in the apeiron the self-limiting limit ofbounded things, which is to say, time as distinct from the ...
The Embodiment of the individual self: a conceptualization of body in hegel’s phenomenology of spirit Önder, Sevi Emek; Çırakman, Elif; Department of Philosophy (2018) The primary purpose of this thesis is to investigate and conceptualize the notion of “body” in the context of certain sections of the Phenomenology of Spirit. While investigating the notion of “body” in the thesis, my intention is to see the possibility of reading the Phenomenology as “the science of the embodiment of consciousness”. By relying on this approach, I will try to thematize and give a comprehensive account of the “body” in the “Consciousness” and “Self-Consciousness” sections of the Phenomenolog...
THE PHILOSOPHY OF MICHEL FOUCAULT: FROM ARCHAEOLOGY TO GENEALOGY, FROM STRUCTURALISM TO POSTSTRUCTURALISM Ülker, Cenk; Karademir, Aret; Department of Philosophy (2022-12) The question of whether Foucault can be considered a structuralist or a poststructuralist philosopher has led to various interpretations among Foucault scholars. On the one hand, the Foucault scholars reading his archaeological method from a poststructuralist perspective argue that Foucault aimed to diagnose the present from the beginning of his archaeological period in order to understand what the present day is. On the other hand, some argue that Foucault cannot be called a structuralist because he is con...

Citation Formats

F. İbrahimhakkıoğlu, “The Imaginary and Descartes’s Paradoxical Rationality,” FLSF (Felsefe ve Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi), pp. 37–50, 2018, Accessed: 00, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://hdl.handle.net/11511/71961.