Show/Hide Menu
Hide/Show Apps
Logout
Türkçe
Türkçe
Search
Search
Login
Login
OpenMETU
OpenMETU
About
About
Open Science Policy
Open Science Policy
Open Access Guideline
Open Access Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Communities & Collections
Communities & Collections
Help
Help
Frequently Asked Questions
Frequently Asked Questions
Guides
Guides
Thesis submission
Thesis submission
MS without thesis term project submission
MS without thesis term project submission
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission
Publication submission
Supporting Information
Supporting Information
General Information
General Information
Copyright, Embargo and License
Copyright, Embargo and License
Contact us
Contact us
Ontolojik natüralizm ve yöntemsel natüralizm birbirini dışlar: deneysel parapsikolojinin düşündürdükleri üzerine
Date
2018-12-31
Author
Tümkaya, Serdal
Metadata
Show full item record
Item Usage Stats
401
views
0
downloads
Cite This
In analytic Western philosophy, it is said to be two versions of naturalism. The first one is ontological and the second is methodological. Ontological version suggests that there are no supernatural entities. The methodological one argues that there are or should be no categorical distinctions between philosophy and science. I, herein, argue that these two versions exclude each other. Here are my major reasons. What is to be acknowledged as supernatural or natural cannot be foreknown. Science is subject to an everlasting revision both in terms of theories and values. Philosophers such as Quine or Philipp Frank even suggested that “If I saw indirect explanatory benefit in positing … spirits … I would joyfully accord them scientific status” (Quine) or if formulated in an untestable way “all things are material, that there is no spirit” would become a metaphysical hypothesis (Frank).
Subject Keywords
Methodological naturalism
,
Ontological naturalism
,
Parapsychology
,
Demarcation problem
,
Quine
,
Yöntemsel natüralizm
,
Ontolojik natüralizm
,
Parapsikoloji
,
Bilimsellik ölçütleri sorunu
URI
https://hdl.handle.net/11511/86816
https://mantik.org.tr/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/VIII-Mantik-Calistayi-Kitabi.pdf
Conference Name
VIII. Mantık Çalıştayı Kitabı
Collections
Department of Philosophy, Conference / Seminar
Suggestions
OpenMETU
Core
ARISTOTLE ON ONTOLOGICAL PRIORITY
Ünlü, Hikmet (2020-01-01)
There are several passages in the Metaphysics where Aristotle explains ontological priority in terms of ontological dependence, but there are others where he seems to adopt a teleological conception of ontological priority. It is sometimes maintained that the latter priority too must be construed in terms of the former, or that the priorities in question arc not both endorsed (or simultaneously endorsed) by Aristotle. The goal of this paper is to show otherwise; I argue that what is at issue are two distinc...
Wittgenstein and Zen: a comparison
Ercan, Ahmet Bora; Grünberg, David; Department of Philosophy (2010)
This thesis is a comparison of the philosophical systems of Zen Buddhism, which is an Eastern Philosophy, with Ludwig Wittgenstein's philosophical studies, who is an extraordinaryname of the Western Philosophy şn the 20th century. The history and sources of Zen Buddhism were given its adoption in the use of language and arts. Besides, this study exemplifies the philosophy of Zen Buddhism with the examples from the life story of Wittgenstein.The thesis is written with a full awareness of the sensitivity of c...
A new theory of content
Aytekin, Tevfik; Sayan, Erdinç; Department of Philosophy (2003)
Naturalistic philosophers of meaning try to define the recalcitrant concept of reference in terms respected by the empirical science, such as causality or teleology. In this thesis, after a brief introduction to these trials is given, Fodors theory of content in terms of asymmetric dependence is examined in some depth. I claim that although this theory involves an important insight, it is an unsatisfactory attempt at reduction of the notion of reference. I develop a new theory of content, which does not hav...
THE PHILOSOPHY OF MICHEL FOUCAULT: FROM ARCHAEOLOGY TO GENEALOGY, FROM STRUCTURALISM TO POSTSTRUCTURALISM
Ülker, Cenk; Karademir, Aret; Department of Philosophy (2022-12)
The question of whether Foucault can be considered a structuralist or a poststructuralist philosopher has led to various interpretations among Foucault scholars. On the one hand, the Foucault scholars reading his archaeological method from a poststructuralist perspective argue that Foucault aimed to diagnose the present from the beginning of his archaeological period in order to understand what the present day is. On the other hand, some argue that Foucault cannot be called a structuralist because he is con...
The Relationship of art and truth in the philosophy of Heidegger /
Kurt, Fikret; Ceylan, Yasin; Department of Philosophy (2014)
Revolutionary vision of Heidegger’s philosophy is rooted into the unthinking of the history of philosophy, and his extraordinary endeavor is to unravel whatever remained ignored under the courses of traditional philosophy: The meaning of the question of Being. By interrogating the meaning of the question of Being, Heidegger traces back to reveal the essential horizons related to the origin of thought and truth. Heidegger criticizes the traditional understanding of truth based on correspondence theory of tru...
Citation Formats
IEEE
ACM
APA
CHICAGO
MLA
BibTeX
S. Tümkaya, “Ontolojik natüralizm ve yöntemsel natüralizm birbirini dışlar: deneysel parapsikolojinin düşündürdükleri üzerine,” Zonguldak, Turkey, 2018, p. 463, Accessed: 00, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://hdl.handle.net/11511/86816.