Aristotle on Melissus on Infinity

Date

2021-01-01

Author

Güremen, Refik

Metadata

Show full item record

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Item Usage Stats

131
views

0
downloads

© 2021 Australasian Journal of Philosophy.This paper claims that the argument that Aristotle seems to ascribe to Melissus in Physics III.6 about infinity is different from Melissus’ original argument. On scrutiny, it turns out that the Aristotelian version of the argument takes Melissus to suppose that being is unlimited because it is not in contact with anything else. I claim that this is not Melissus’ notion of unlimitedness for being, and that the Aristotelian version hinges on a reversal of Melissus’ own reasoning.

URI

https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85118107866&origin=inward
https://hdl.handle.net/11511/94304

Journal

Australasian Journal of Philosophy

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1080/00048402.2021.1993450

Collections

Department of Philosophy, Article

Suggestions

OpenMETU
Core

The anarchy of justice: Hesiod’s Chaos, Anaximander’s apeiron, and geometric thought Grıffıth, James Edmond Carr (2022-04-01) This article examines Hesiod’s Chaos and Anaximander’s apeiron individually and inrelation to each other through the frame of René Descartes’ notion of natural geometry andthrough bounds and limits in Euclid and Immanuel Kant. Thanks to this frame, it shows that, inhis poetic vision, Hesiod saw in Chaos the act of bounding such that different things can appearwhile, in his speculative vision, Anaximander saw in the apeiron the self-limiting limit ofbounded things, which is to say, time as distinct from the ...
A Study of argumentation in Turkish within a Bayesian reasoning framework : arguments from ignorance Karaaslan, Hatice; Hohenberger, Annette Edeltraud; Demir, Mehmet Hilmi; Department of Cognitive Sciences (2012) In this dissertation, a normative prescriptive paradigm, namely a Bayesian theory of content-dependent argument strength, was employed in order to investigate argumentation, specifically the classic fallacy of the “argument from ignorance” or “argumentum ad ignorantiam”. The study was carried out in Turkish with Turkish participants. In the Bayesian framework, argument strength is determined by the interactions between three major factors: prior belief, polarity, and evidence reliability. In addition, topic...
A critical evaluation of Kripke's interpretation of Wittgenstein Karaağaç, Hasan; Sayan, Erdinç; Department of Philosophy (2004) This thesis analyzes the relation between Kripke's rule-sceptic argument and Wittgenstein's paradox. Besides, Kripke's claim that the conclusion of Wittgenstein's private language argument is stated in PI 202 will be discussed. The thesis will also evaluate the consistency of Kripke's rule-sceptic argument independently of Wittgenstein's views.
Predication in Aristotle's Categories: A Response to Plato's Theory of Forms Duran, Zeynep; Güremen, Refik; Department of Philosophy (2021-10-4) This study aims to provide a textual evidence to the idea of reading the Categories of Aristotle as a criticism of the Platonic Theory of Forms, by means of Metaphysics, A, 9, 990b22-991a8 and Alexander’s commentary on it (88,5-95,2). According to the main examples of this reading from the contemporary literature, the predication theory of the Categories, conceiving being as “being something” and holding the idea that “being is said in many ways,” denies the Platonic predication theory that is expounded by ...
THE MENO AND THE SECOND PROBLEM OF GEOMETRY AT 86e Bağçe, Samet (2016-01-01) The aim of this paper is two-fold: firstly, to argue for the claim that the two problems of geometry presented in the Meno seem to be connected to each other, and secondly, to offer, in connection with the first claim, a conjecture concerning the nature of the second problem of geometry brought up in the dialogue at 86e. This paper offers, in particular, a historical reconstruction of how we should understand this problem of construction in geometry.

Citation Formats

R. Güremen, “Aristotle on Melissus on Infinity,” Australasian Journal of Philosophy, pp. 0–0, 2021, Accessed: 00, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85118107866&origin=inward.