Show/Hide Menu
Hide/Show Apps
Logout
Türkçe
Türkçe
Search
Search
Login
Login
OpenMETU
OpenMETU
About
About
Open Science Policy
Open Science Policy
Open Access Guideline
Open Access Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Communities & Collections
Communities & Collections
Help
Help
Frequently Asked Questions
Frequently Asked Questions
Guides
Guides
Thesis submission
Thesis submission
MS without thesis term project submission
MS without thesis term project submission
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission
Publication submission
Supporting Information
Supporting Information
General Information
General Information
Copyright, Embargo and License
Copyright, Embargo and License
Contact us
Contact us
Discursive strategies in the Brexit debate: the Economy
Download
10464544.pdf
Date
2022-6
Author
Akhan, Yağmur Lalin
Metadata
Show full item record
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License
.
Item Usage Stats
246
views
243
downloads
Cite This
This thesis aims to scrutinize discursive strategies (attack, acclaim, and defense) the Leave and Remain campaigners employed during the section on the economy in the United Kingdom European Union membership referendum debate, which was broadcasted live on BBC on 21 June 2016. The data was selected according to five criteria; time frame, broadcasting medium (radio/television), broadcasting type (pre-recording/ live broadcasting), genre, and public appeal. The debate was transcribed verbatim in ELAN Transcription Software. A quantitative content analysis approach was adopted to operationalize the discursive strategies, and the coding instrument was MAXQDA. In the economy section, the dominant strategy for the Remain campaign, the incumbent or the defendant of the status quo, was expected to be acclaim. As the challenger of the status quo, the Leave campaign's dominant strategy was expected to be attack. Consistent with the expectations, it was found that the Leave campaign attacked more than they acclaimed and defended. Nevertheless, against expectations, the Remain campaign's dominant strategy was proved to be attack. The thesis argues that the degree of public discontent with the status quo and the cumulative effect of decades-long Euroscepticism caused the Remain campaign to attack more and acclaim less during the economy section of the live European Union referendum debate.
Subject Keywords
Live broadcasted referendum debate
,
Brexit
,
Quantitative content analysis
,
Functional theory of election debates
URI
https://hdl.handle.net/11511/97379
Collections
Graduate School of Social Sciences, Thesis
Suggestions
OpenMETU
Core
Brexit and the UK’s alternative future security and defense relationship with the European Union
Karataş, Gülşah; Kahraman, Sevilay; Department of International Relations (2019)
The UK decided to leave the EU on 23 June 2016 with a historical referendum. Brexit vote paved the way for new academic discussions on European disintegration process. There are concerns over Brexit that it could lead to a domino effect and increase the anti-EU voices among member states. There is a vital need to find a new security and defense partnership to secure the borders of Europe as reducing cooperation will not be a logical or intended option for both parties. This thesis aims to analyze alternativ...
Brexit and the EU-UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement in comparison: EU principles and practices of governing the neighbourhood
Kahraman, Sevilay (2022-08-01)
Brexit is the recent example of British exceptionalism, namely, accommodating the UK's special position in the EU through differential membership, albeit from outside. UK negotiators initially demanded a 'bespoke' agreement for retaining most benefits of membership with limited obligations. Faced with an EU united around a set of negotiating guidelines, the UK opted for a distant and looser future relationship. Indeed, Brexit negotiations and the EU-UK TCA highlight core principles of EU external relations....
Convergence in Public Sector Upsizing/Downsizing: An Analysis of Post-Communist Countries and the EU
Çınar, Süleyman Kürşat (2018-12-01)
Brexit’ in Turkish Political Debates: End of the Road or a New Trajectory?
Alpan, Başak Zeynep; Şenyuva, Özgehan (null, 2020-01-01)
This chapter explores perceptions of the Brexit process and images of European integration after Brexit in Turkey. It aims to identify perceptions of the European Union (EU) among Turkish elites, general public opinion and Turkish EU experts in the period of uncertainty following the Brexit vote of 2016 in the UK. The prevalent British sentiment that the EU is a Franco-German project that privileged French and German interests to the detriment of those of the other member states is somewhat similar to the m...
Party-level euroscepticism of the radical populist political parties in the european union member states: the cases of the united kingdom independence party (UKİP) and the coalition of the radical left (SYRİZA)
Özbey, Ebru Ece; Şenyuva, Özgehan; Department of European Studies (2016)
In this thesis, I investigate the strategic and ideological aspects of the Euroscepticisms of the United Kingdom Independence Party (UKIP) and the Coalition of the Radical Left (SYRIZA) as examples of radical populist parties which have been on the rise in Europe for the last three decades –especially since the 2014 European Parliamentary elections. I contest the way these parties are represented in media and academia, which is often alarmist and devoid of nuance, and claim that deeming these parties as a t...
Citation Formats
IEEE
ACM
APA
CHICAGO
MLA
BibTeX
Y. L. Akhan, “Discursive strategies in the Brexit debate: the Economy,” M.S. - Master of Science, Middle East Technical University, 2022.